Noted you'd recently joined this project!

You may or may not have read the recent discussion here regarding the probably poor representation of anthropology on Wikipedia, plus an associated proposed effort to see if this situation might be somewhat repaired through monthly collaborations?

Having newly joined the project please feel free to boldly participate in upgrading 'core' anthropology articles, including, possibly, making any additions/providing any assistance you may be willing/able to provide to this month's collaboration:Kinship.

Cheers Bruceanthro (talk) 16:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-28T16:38:00.000Z","author":"Bruceanthro","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bruceanthro-2008-01-28T16:38:00.000Z-Welcome_to_Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anthropology","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I noticed your recent edit "History: market isn't the only consideration". I agree with you. The whole of that section does see market as a success criterion though. Higher up the article it says "The first successful database product for microcomputers was dBASE". I assume success refers to market, not theoretical purity. Maybe it's worth starting a discussion on Talk:Database about what success means. Or maybe not. (Northernhenge (talk) 08:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-03T08:26:00.000Z","author":"Northernhenge","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Northernhenge-2008-04-03T08:26:00.000Z-Database","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, thanks for your attempted compromise. I don't see a compromise with the anonymous editor as particularly necessary, however, as this person doesn't seem to edit in good faith generally and has been going around vandalizing various articles. Unless you really feel the word "man" is necessary there, can we just change it to "humanity", "humankind" or some other word that doesn't sound like it came from a 1950s textbook? Thanks. --Newsroom hierarchies (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-29T02:43:00.000Z","author":"Newsroom hierarchies","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Newsroom_hierarchies-2008-05-29T02:43:00.000Z-man_vs_humankind","replies":[]}}-->

For those of you who signed up early, Wiki-Conference New York has been confirmed for the weekend of July 25-26 at New York University, and we have Jimmy Wales signed on as a keynote speaker.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-07-01T03:15:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2009-07-01T03:15:00.000Z-Wiki-Conference_New_York_Update:_3_weeks_to_go","replies":[]}}-->

I've just seen (two years late) your query at Talk:N-dimensional space about the phrase "the n-dimensionality of literary works". It may be only an overly fancy way of saying 'complexity' but ...

Any complex phenomenon can be measured in multiple ways, and plotted on a scatter graph in which each of the graph's dimensions represents one measurement. For example, you could make a chart of cities where the dimensions are population, wealth, number of days of frost in a year, immigration and emigration ratios, and whatnot. Of course you'd need to project the graph into two or three dimensions to get a meaningful look at it, but since we're talking about a metaphor that shouldn't matter!

Typically one uses a scatter graph to estimate how many independent variables the phenomenon has; see Degrees of freedom (statistics):

Mathematically, degrees of freedom is the dimension of the domain of a random vector, or essentially the number of 'free' components: how many components need to be known before the vector is fully determined.

Thus, to say that a phenomenon – such as literature – has high dimension is to say that you can't fully describe it with any small number of measurements.

I hope this isn't either opaque or patronizing. —Tamfang (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-12T01:20:00.000Z","author":"Tamfang","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tamfang-2010-01-12T01:20:00.000Z-dimensions","replies":[]}}-->

Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-08-03T15:19:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2010-08-03T15:19:00.000Z-Wiki-Conference_NYC_(2nd_annual)","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. When you recently edited Brewster Kahle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WAIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-25T09:48:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2012-04-25T09:48:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_April_25","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hi, in my opinion an editor has hijacked the gift economy article and among other things deleted valuable content that you entered. He has done this without discussion and explanation. I currently am in a content dispute with him, so I'd like to ask if could come an revert that edit for me? See here: [1] Tpylkkö (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-25T09:39:00.000Z","author":"Tpylkk\u00f6","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tpylkk\u00f6-2013-02-25T09:39:00.000Z-Requesting_opinion","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T16:29:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:29:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Girl2k. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Girl2k. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2018_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

An article you recently created, Wisconsin Society for Ornithology, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 17:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-28T17:50:00.000Z","author":"Willsome429","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Willsome429-2020-02-28T17:50:00.000Z-Wisconsin_Society_for_Ornithology_moved_to_draftspace","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news sources to show it's more than the WP:MILL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wisconsin Society for Ornithology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wisconsin Society for Ornithology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-04-08T16:11:00.000Z","author":"AngusWOOF","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AngusWOOF-2020-04-08T16:11:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Wisconsin_Society_for_Ornithology_(Apr","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Girl2k! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-04-08T16:11:00.000Z","author":"AngusWOOF","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AngusWOOF-2020-04-08T16:11:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Wisconsin_Society_for_Ornithology_(Apr-1","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T01:32:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T01:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Girl2k. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wisconsin Society for Ornithology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-22T15:02:00.000Z","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-2021-03-22T15:02:00.000Z-Concern_regarding_Draft:Wisconsin_Society_for_Ornithology","replies":[]}}-->