PROFILPELAJAR.COM

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Colonies Chris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

List of wars involving Bulgaria

Hi Chris, with this edit you've broken 11 images. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Fixed. Once again I see that my positive contributions go unacknowledged but my errors are picked up on immediately. I've learned my lesson, and will return to retirement. Colonies Chris (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey Chris, I just saw errors pop up in Category:Articles with missing files that I patrol daily (ish) and let you know - that is all. Would you rather that errors go unnoticed? I would rather any I make be picked up 'immediately' as you say. Sorry that you appear to have taken this as a negative but I said 'Hi' and 'Cheers' and was just trying to be polite while just pointing out the errors - nothing more or less. Errors are errors, and we all make them, and the more edits we do the more likely we miss a couple, but they still need to be addressed. Sounds like stuff on and/or off Wiki is getting to you and I can certainly sympathise - the work we do here as individuals is hardly ever noticed just the anonymised overall result, unfortunately the opposite is true for errors that are personalised. I've been considering trying to retire as well as although I know I make a positive contribution all you see is the endless work to do and the negative responses :/ So please do just take this as it was meant as just pointing out the errors, nothing more. You have already given more to the project with 300K+ edits than most so if you stay or retire never forget what you done. In the end do what makes you happiest. All the best KylieTastic (talk) 00:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eaglesham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canmore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Opera DYK archive

I wonder if it's a good idea to change the archive, even if it is "wrong". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

author names

Hello,

Thanks for your work editing Wikipedia. Sorry to have had to revert your edit to List of Melaleuca species. A quick check here will show that there are no spaces in author names. The reason some of the author names on the list page were red-linked is that nobody has written about them. Your edit created red-links because the author name was then incorrect - "C. A. Gardner" instead of "C.A.Gardner" for example. The author of Melaleuca agathosmoides was C.A.Gardner. Please check the M. agathosmoides page. It would be great if someone would write pages about the others - Kirsten Jane Cowley (K.J.Cowley), Bryan Alwyn Barlow (Barlow) and John Wyndham Dawson (J.W.Dawson) for example.) The only reason your change from "F.Muell." to "F. Muell." is not now red-linked is that someone created a redirect in case of an incorrect spelling. Mueller's abbreviation is "F.Muell.".

I see you have now undone my reversion. Please read the above carefully, check the pages I've linked (above) and replace the original version of the list. And have a very nice day! Gderrin (talk) 23:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

By the way, the author of Melaleuca brevisepala was John Wyndham Dawson, not John William Dawson. No page on J.W.Dawson yet. Gderrin (talk) 23:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

The other author names you have changed and created a red-link when the originals were correct (and correctly linked) are A.S.George (for Alex George), the author of Melaleuca coccinea and R.D.Spencer (for Roger David Spencer) the author of Melaleuca pearsonii and Melaleuca recurva. There is one mistake in the original version - I spelled Lyndley Craven's name incorrectly at Melaleuca sphaerodendra (not Lindley Craven). Gderrin (talk) 00:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Gderrin - some points:

I did not change F.Muell to F. Muell. I simply removed the pointless piping, which was itself a redirect - this exposed the fact that the abbreviation already in place was non-standard.

And it's confusing to other editors to sometimes use the standard abbreviation and yet pipe it to the article name even when the abbreviation is unambiguous (e.g. [[Stanley Thatcher Blake|S.T.Blake]])

If you want authors' names given here to be recognised as standard abbreviations by other editors, I suggest that you add them to the relevant lists, even if there isn't an article for them yet. I checked the lists in Category:Botanists with author abbreviations before making my changes.
In the case of B.A.Barlow, it makes no sense to disambiguate the standard abbreviation (Barlow) by piping it to another abbreviation that looks like a standard botanical abbreviation but isn't (see List_of_botanists_by_author_abbreviation_(B)). It should be piped to the person's name. even though there isn't yet an article for him.
I only later found a reference to John William Dawson and wrongly assumed that he was the man referred to.
I'm sorry about the C.A.Gardner and R.D.Spencer and A.S.George changes - these were a late-night mistake on my part. However, I suggest that redirects from the conventionally abbreviated names (as well as from the botanical abbreviations) would surely be useful to readers looking for information on these people.

I will revert my changes and leave any further improvements up to you.

Colonies Chris (talk) 08:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks mate. I'll check all the author names and take your advice about adding names to the "list of botanists' names". Gderrin (talk) 09:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mosman, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lower North Shore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)