User talk:Chicdat

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-24.182.239.226-20241229231200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Kevin_Trudeau-20241229231200","replies":["c-24.182.239.226-20241229231200-Kevin_Trudeau"],"text":"Kevin Trudeau","linkableTitle":"Kevin Trudeau"}-->

Kevin Trudeau

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-24.182.239.226-20241229231200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Kevin_Trudeau-20241229231200","replies":["c-24.182.239.226-20241229231200-Kevin_Trudeau"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Chicdat-20241231165600-24.182.239.226-20241229231200","timestamp":"20241231165600"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__2__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-24.182.239.226-20241229231200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Kevin_Trudeau-20241229231200","replies":["c-24.182.239.226-20241229231200-Kevin_Trudeau"],"text":"Kevin Trudeau","linkableTitle":"Kevin Trudeau"}-->

It's worth noting that, even beyond the conviction for criminal contempt (which in this instance was definitely a felony), Kevin Trudeau also has earlier convictions for felony credit card fraud and larceny. 24.182.239.226 (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241229231200","author":"24.182.239.226","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-24.182.239.226-20241229231200-Kevin_Trudeau","replies":["c-Chicdat-20241231165600-24.182.239.226-20241229231200"]}}-->

So sorry about the edit summary, upon further research I saw that contempt of court is in fact a felony, but was on vacation and had no time to correct. Anyway, consensus per WP:FELON is to not label prominent BLPs as felons without a discussion on the talk page. For instance we don't describe Donald Trump as a convicted felon in the first sentence. Hope this helps. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241231165600","author":"Chicdat","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Chicdat-20241231165600-24.182.239.226-20241229231200","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cremastra-20250103155600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-20250103155600","replies":["c-Cremastra-20250103155600-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"\"Glacier remnant\" listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"\"Glacier remnant\" listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->

"Glacier remnant" listed at Redirects for discussion

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cremastra-20250103155600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-20250103155600","replies":["c-Cremastra-20250103155600-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Cremastra-20250103155600-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","timestamp":"20250103155600"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cremastra-20250103155600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-20250103155600","replies":["c-Cremastra-20250103155600-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"\"Glacier remnant\" listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"\"Glacier remnant\" listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->

The redirect Glacier remnant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § Glacier remnant until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (u — c) 15:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250103155600","author":"Cremastra","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cremastra-20250103155600-\"Glacier_remnant\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[],"displayName":"u"}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Seahumidity-20250106213100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Scott_Wiener_page-20250106213100","replies":["c-Seahumidity-20250106213100-Scott_Wiener_page"],"text":"Scott Wiener page","linkableTitle":"Scott Wiener page"}-->

Scott Wiener page

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Seahumidity-20250106213100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Scott_Wiener_page-20250106213100","replies":["c-Seahumidity-20250106213100-Scott_Wiener_page"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Chicdat-20250107002700-Seahumidity-20250106213100","timestamp":"20250107002700"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__2__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Seahumidity-20250106213100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Scott_Wiener_page-20250106213100","replies":["c-Seahumidity-20250106213100-Scott_Wiener_page"],"text":"Scott Wiener page","linkableTitle":"Scott Wiener page"}-->

You deleted the whole California Legislative Jewish Caucus section, w/o which page fails NPOV due to huge ommission, since Wiener is a co-Chair; has passed important legislation through it, has secured $160 million through it from the State Budget, and has been in the news regarding various related activities and criticisms.

Edit CLJC section if you like or if you think it isn’t neutral, but don’t delete the whole thing!Seahumidity (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250106213100","author":"Seahumidity","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Seahumidity-20250106213100-Scott_Wiener_page","replies":["c-Chicdat-20250107002700-Seahumidity-20250106213100"]}}-->

Feel free to re-add the section with a less promotional tone. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 00:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250107002700","author":"Chicdat","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Chicdat-20250107002700-Seahumidity-20250106213100","replies":[]}}-->