User talk:Cadenas2008

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Andrew_Tate_verification-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z-Andrew_Tate_verification"],"text":"Andrew Tate verification","linkableTitle":"Andrew Tate verification"}-->

Andrew Tate verification

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Andrew_Tate_verification-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z-Andrew_Tate_verification"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Andrew_Tate_verification-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z-Andrew_Tate_verification"],"text":"Andrew Tate verification","linkableTitle":"Andrew Tate verification"}-->

It was actually 17 days. Adagegibed (talk) 06:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z","author":"Adagegibed","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Adagegibed-2022-01-13T06:49:00.000Z-Andrew_Tate_verification","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message"],"text":"ArbCom 2017 election voter message","linkableTitle":"ArbCom 2017 election voter message"}-->

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message"],"text":"ArbCom 2017 election voter message","linkableTitle":"ArbCom 2017 election voter message"}-->

Hello, Cadenas2008. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK"],"text":"Merger proposal for Haplogroup UK","linkableTitle":"Merger proposal for Haplogroup UK"}-->

Merger proposal for Haplogroup UK

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK"],"text":"Merger proposal for Haplogroup UK","linkableTitle":"Merger proposal for Haplogroup UK"}-->

I appreciated your comments on article Haplogroup UK and I am proposing a solution, to merge the UK stub with Haplogroup U. If you are in favor please let us know on Haplogroup_UK#Merger_proposal. There is not much to merge. Mainly it will serve as a re-direct for anyone searching for the older term, UK.

I thought about merging the UK stub with Haplogroup K, but I could not find enough evidence to support this. It seems safer to merge with Haplogroup U and let some authority update the redirect in the future if we ever find or obtain a common authority for phylogenetic taxonomy. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 21:37, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z","author":"Anon lynx","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anon_lynx-2020-02-07T21:37:00.000Z-Merger_proposal_for_Haplogroup_UK","replies":[],"displayName":"Stephen Charles Thompson"}}-->