This page contains Indic text. Without rendering support you may see irregular vowel positioning and a lack of conjuncts. More...
Users with Marathi language background are kindly requested to test all Visual Editor features along with Marathi language display settings and file the bugs wherever necessary.
Abhishikt, Presently you are on english wikipedia, You are invited to Marathi Wikipedia!This template shall keep you informed about support and contribution required in various Marathi Wikipedia articles in times to come.
Welcome message in Marathi Language
नमस्कार, Abhishikt आपण Marathi language- किंवा Maharashtra-विषयक लेखात जे योगदान केले आहे त्याबद्दल धन्यवाद.
इंग्रजी आणि मराठी विकिपीडियावरील सहयोगच्या माध्यमातून विकिपीडिया संबंधीत प्रकल्पांचा आणि लेखांचा आवाका आणि गुणवत्ता सुधारावी या हेतूने विविध प्रकल्पाची आखणी केली आहे आपण या विकिपीडिया:प्रकल्पात लेखन योगदान करून या प्रकल्पाचा हिस्सा व्हावेत या सदिच्छेने मी आपणास हे निमंत्रण देत आहे.
या प्रकल्पात सहभाग घेऊन आपण सहकार्य करू इच्छित असाल तर, कृपया मराठी विकिपीडियाचे समाज मुखपृष्ठ आणि आपल्या आवडीच्या प्रकल्प पानास भेट देऊन अधिक माहिती घ्यावी हि नम्र विनंती. पुन्हा एकदा धन्यवाद!~~~~
मराठी विकिपीडियात लेखांचा मराठीत शोध/अथवा लेखनासाठी ह्या व्हिडिओत दाखवल्या प्रमाणे मराठी आणि नंतर अक्षरांतरण पर्याय निवडा अथवा इनस्क्रिप्ट साठी 'मराठी लिपी' पर्याय, Click on the 'cc to change the subtitle languages to Marathi, English, Sanskrit, Kokani,Ahirani.
१ मे, २०१३मराठी विकिपीडियाच्या दहाव्या वर्धापनदिनानिमित्त स्मृतिचिन्ह
आपल्या मराठी विकिपीडियावरील सहभागाबद्दल, सहवासाबद्दल आणि उत्कृष्ट योगदानाबद्दल हे मराठी विकीचे अभिमान गौरव निशाणमराठी विकिपीडियाच्या सर्व आजी माजी वाचक,संपादक, आणि चहात्यांना अर्पण करण्यात येत आहे.आपल्या आवडीचे वाचन,लेखन संपादन असेच सदैव घडत राहो हि शुभेच्छा!!
आपल्याला माहित आहे का ? कि, इंग्लिश विकिपीडियातसुद्धा नॅव्हीगेशन म्हणजे सुचालन मराठी भाषेतून करणे अधिक सुलभ झाले आहे.डावीकडच्या मेन्यू कॉलममध्ये languagees च्या तीथे या चक्र चिन्हा जवळ आपण नॅव्हीगेशन तसेच लिहिण्याची भाषा निवडू शकता ? आपण Special:Preferences पानावर Internationalisation मथळ्या पुढे सुद्धा mr-मराठी भाषा निवडून नॅव्हीगेशन म्हणजे सुचालन मराठी भाषेतून करू शकता.
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wael Bahaa-El-Din, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wael Bahaa-El-Din seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wael Bahaa-El-Din, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click hereCSDWarnBot (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Nadig kruttika requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
A tag has been placed on 2010 Corus Chess Tournament requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ridit Nimdia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6557, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ridit Nimdia with a link to where we can find that note.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ridit Nimdia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Regards, SunCreator(talk)13:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock-auto|1=131.107.0.81|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JSL5871". The reason given for JSL5871's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".|3=MLauba|4=2065969}}
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible that your edits to the article, seeking to promote controversial aspects far beyond their due weight, is motivated by your being an atheist, and is therefore a kind of POV editing on your part? -Stevertigo (t | log | c) 06:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious as to why you do not sign your posts on the talk pages? Is there any particular reason? I am interested. Also signing posts is part of the guidelines here at Wikipedia. Please read: WP:TPG#YES. Thank you.--- Steve Quinn (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Abhishikt. You have new messages at Talk:Bigg Boss (Season 4). Message added 14:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Existence of God
Hi there Abhishikt. I am not preaching, I have merely pointed out factual information. In accordance with Wikipedia policy, my contribution:
Contains No Original Research
Has a Neutral Point of View
Is Completely Verifiable
So what is your problem ? Do you have a prejudice against Christianity ? The teaching of Jesus and the Apostles recorded in the Bible is directly relevant and important to the subject.
AHA ! Now I see it ! Your user page reveals you to be a self-confessed atheist ! I challenge you: Read the Gospels in prayer, asking God to convince you whether it is true or false, and whether it is His word. Put Jesus teaching into practice. Then come back and tell me whether or not God exists. Give up your prejudice and check out the facts for a change ! Darkman101 (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Atheism 3.0 AfD
Hey Abhishikt. Just an FYI regarding your AfD of Atheism 3.0, it's generally customary to cast a vote in your own AfD noms (if you have an opinion on it, that is), since an editor may sometimes bring an article to AfD after discussion elsewhere when they don't, themselves, agree with the nom, or they may be undecided on the issue and only looking for discussion. As such, your nomination may or may not be counted as a delete vote, so you may wish to be explicit about your opinion. Also, while I'm here, would you mind linking your user page and/or talk page in your sig? You don't currently, which forces users to type the url in manually to find them. Thanks! — Jess· Δ♥19:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know, but I have already voted for deletion on 16th. I have improved my signature now as per your suggestion :) Abhishikt (talk) 20:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you too Abishka - this demonstrates that the way you went about the afd was flawed because you don't understand that you were supposed to have an indepth discussion of the ideas not a simple straw vote. The afd is itself voidable.But we are at a new poin t How bout this - would you please paste me a copy of the old article so I can see what the problems were? That would be constructive. Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are right Devilishlyhandsome, that AfD is not "votes" and Jess probably conveyed it incorrectly, I guess he meant to convey that I should also state my reasons for deletion of that article. For previous version of the article, I saw though my changes history, but couldn't find it, you can probably contact an admin. BTW my name is Abhishikt. Abhishikt (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Abhishikt, it seems that I am being given to understand for your then-current and apparently persisting resistance to WP coverage of this emerging trend in the intellectual history of popular atheist philosophy is that I should "contact an administrator" because you don't remember why. Gee whiz man. That resonates with Rick Warren's assertion that we should trust "God's Word" even if it makes no sense. Sorry, I can't participate in the fiction that this is a satisfactory explanation for the inexplicable collapse of WP:CENSOR.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I was being clear enough, and seem to have gotten my intention across to the editor I was addressing, but in any case... yes, obviously the AfD was not a straw poll. However, making one's support clear in an AfD discussion is instrumental to determining consensus. I believe this is all covered in WP:CON. Either way, this really isn't the right way to "fight an improper AfD", even if this was one. WP:ANI would be the place to go if you felt an admin had acted improperly. — Jess· Δ♥02:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't necessarily asserting that he "acted improperly" by closing the afd, I assert that the afd of that old article, which had only two citations, stated four times, is irrelevant to the forced userfication of a new article which had many more citations, which IMHO was not consistent with policy. And I take exception to this mantra that somebody or other keeps repeating that supposedly the article is not sourced when in fact there are multiple verifiable reliable sources including published authors,a Harvard chaplain, a Ph D or two. And what is really just appalling is that anyone would think for a moment that failed afd constitutes a basis for excluded content...sorry but this all smacks of suppression of intellectual freedom. I wish you guys would simply let the new article stand on its merits. Sorry I can understand that you just went through an afd and although Anapum is a very competent researcher he did neglect to fully source the article and it doesn't seem that he conducted as vigorous a defense as was required. I have not given up hope that you will agree to re-open the matter - I would not object to a replacement into mainspace with a de novo afd. It is a new and different article with more sources and deserves its own fair hearing.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Devilishlyhandsome, we agree with you on the fact that AfD is not voting and we used the term incorrect in conveying the real intend. Shall we please call this a WP:DEADHORSE. Abhishikt (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re:Existence of God
Hello Abhishikt, thank you for your comment on my talk page. I looked at the section on the talk page you referred me to and it looks like their was a support for the moving of the argument to a different section, where it exists now. Regardless, I've added a reliable source to the statement to ensure its continued existence in the article. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk19:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please respect the EDIT NOTICE: No major shift w/o consensus
COPIED TO TALK PAGE of article
I reverted a substantial edit made without consensus. Just because four people in a contested process were able to for the time being prevent a poorly-documented (2 refs) article about a topic (Aeth 3.0) from its own freestanding article does not give you the right to unilaterally obliterate all mention of any author in that tradition, particularly under this kind of edit warning. Please do not do this again, thank you very much. Cheers.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because you have participated in a related RfC on this article, or have recently contributed to it, you are hereby informed that your input would be highly appreciated on the new RfC here: [[1]]. Thank you! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Did you bother to discuss the issue in the appropriate section of the talk page or are you going to continue to edit war? WP:NPOV states "Editing from a neutral point of view (NPOV) means representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources." Thanks, AnupamTalk05:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Edit conflict- This is absurd. All I removed part of your additions giving reason that those are not verifiable and simply asked you to gain consensus and you are engaging in edit war without giving any reason or attempting to talk. and you post this warning on my talk page for doing only one revert??. Can you explain yourself? Abhishikt (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First you have to prove the notability and reliablility of the sources. Did you try to prove that or tried to gain consensus, as I had mentioned in my comments? Abhishikt (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you noticed my first edit summary, when the content was added, it stated "balanced findings with additional study + references per talk", where I discussed the addition of the study. If you object to the addition of the study, you should comment there rather than blindly reverting me. Also, contrary to what you stated above, you did not revert once, but twice. If you revert once more, you will have reached 3RR. In addition, to answer your question, the reference is reliable as it is taken from an academic journal. It is furthermore notable as the study was reported in CNN, among other forms of mass media. You would have obtained this information if you looked at the thread on the talk page I opened up. Rab Raakha, AnupamTalk05:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anupam, you actually reverted five times. Please stop templating editors with these unfounded warnings, misusing sources by twisting them to fit your POV, and reverting "as vandalism" when there is none. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I noticed that you added "Above proposed sentence is to replace an existing sentence shown in below" to the RfC. The RfC proposal does not mean that the proposed sentence should replace an existing one. It only concerns itself with adding the proposed sentence. Both sentences can appear in the article; the two are not mutually exclusive. Thanks, AnupamTalk04:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
From the edit history of Atheism article, I see that your proposed sentence was added in-place of the existing sentence I mentioned. And such replacement happened multiple times by multiple editors in the edit war there. Also I didn't see any comment from anyone that they are ok with both sentences. May be only you are Ok with both sentences and you can mention that as a part of your comment. Abhishikt (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the edit history, the only reason I reverted the addition of that sentence is to restore the content that I added. I have no problem with the sentence being in the article. I started the RfC and do not see a problem with having both sentences in the article. I would request that you please leave that block of text out of the RfC stem I started. If you'd like to propose another question, you're more than welcome to start another RfC. Thanks, AnupamTalk04:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Let me remove that part. Also I noted that in RfC stem you wrote "reincluded in the article", but the fact is that the sentence was not part of the article. The dispute began when it was added by you. Can you change it to something like "Added in the article" to make it accurate. Abhishikt (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear User:Abhishikt, I hatted your proposal as an alternative in the RfC stem - that way it still appears on top. I also removed the prefix "re" from the word "included" as you requested. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk04:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just noticed the Marathi banner above... I did some work with Tata Consultancy Services a few years back and spent around ten weeks at their offices in Pune. It is truly awesome part of the planet - great people, great food (being from Texas I like spicy), great scenery and great works - with Ellora Caves and Ajanta Caves being particularly impressive. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abhishikt, I note that you undid my edits on God of the Gaps, with a reference to Neutral Point of View. Please carefully review NPOV in the Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines and work with more care in the future. You will note that NPOV does not prevent an article accurately reporting on a topic which represents someone's point of view, nor does it proscribe a description of that point of view. The GOTG article provides plenty of references explaining that "God of the Gaps" is an inherently critical term for theological arguments that are deemed to be faulty. That discussion is expanded in the Talk page. The term was invented by Christian theologians to critique fallacious theology, just as the term "begging the question" was invented by logicians to critique fallacious logic. The GOTG article must make that clear. Mrdavenport (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An individual handset is Not Notable (WP:N). All three or four (610/710/800/900) handsets could be merged under one article eg the 800. The note on a move from symbian to Win could easily be covered as a sentence there or in the general Nokia article.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Jainism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Rahul (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright problem: Criticism of Jainism
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Criticism of Jainism, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Jainism with a link to where we can find that note.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Jainism saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmejudith (talk • contribs) 22:43, December 16, 2013
No offence or hard feelings was meant by my comment on the Chess Project Talk page about the table. I suspected that was the reason for the revert. I'd completely forgotten about that revert until you commented... Jkmaskell (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Julian calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
Hello, Abhishikt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Abhishikt,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.
What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.
Who should join?
Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
An editor must have 500+ edits.
Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.
Hello, Abhishikt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Falun Gong on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hetul Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roller26 (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridit Nimdia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roller26 (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Abhishikt! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
Paste {{Frs user|Abhishikt|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
Artikel ini tidak memiliki referensi atau sumber tepercaya sehingga isinya tidak bisa dipastikan. Tolong bantu perbaiki artikel ini dengan menambahkan referensi yang layak. Tulisan tanpa sumber dapat dipertanyakan dan dihapus sewaktu-waktu.Cari sumber: Josi Katoppo – berita · surat kabar · buku · cendekiawan · JSTOR Cornelis Joost Katoppo (Tomohon, 15 Juni 1941), atau dikenal dengan Josi (Yosi) Katoppo adalah wartawan kawakan Indonesia. Josi mula-mula ...
Pintu masuk ke areal Katakomba Kalistus. Relung kuburan di Katakomba Kalistus Katakomba Santo Kalistus atau singkatnya Katakomba Kalistus (juga dikenal sebagai Pemakaman Callixtus) adalah salah satu Katakomba Katolik Roma di Jalur Appian, yang paling terkenal karena berisi Ruang bawah tanah Para Paus (Italia: Cappella dei Papi), yang pernah berisi makam beberapa Paus dari abad ke-2 hingga ke-4 M.[1][2] Sejarah Katakomba ini diyakini diciptakan oleh Paus Kalistus I di masa depa...
يفتقر محتوى هذه المقالة إلى الاستشهاد بمصادر. فضلاً، ساهم في تطوير هذه المقالة من خلال إضافة مصادر موثوق بها. أي معلومات غير موثقة يمكن التشكيك بها وإزالتها. (نوفمبر 2019) كأس أرمينيا 2002 تفاصيل الموسم كأس أرمينيا النسخة 11 البلد أرمينيا التاريخ بداية:30 مارس 2002 نها�...
Jahn RatisbonaCalcio Jahnelf, Rothosen Segni distintivi Uniformi di gara Casa Trasferta Terza divisa Colori sociali Bianco, rosso Dati societari Città Ratisbona Nazione Germania Confederazione UEFA Federazione DFB Campionato 3. Liga Fondazione 1889 Presidente Hans Rothammer Allenatore Mersad Selimbegovic Stadio Continental Arena(15.224 posti) Sito web www.ssv-jahn.de Palmarès Si invita a seguire il modello di voce Lo Sport- und Schwimmverein Jahn Regensburg e.V., abbreviato in Jahn R...
L'orrore di DunwichTitolo originaleThe Dunwich Horror The Dunwich Horror,illustrazione di László Báti[1]. AutoreHoward Phillips Lovecraft 1ª ed. originale1929 Genereracconto SottogenereHorror Lingua originaleinglese SerieCiclo di Cthulhu Modifica dati su Wikidata · Manuale L'orrore di Dunwich (The Dunwich Horror) è un racconto horror dello scrittore statunitense Howard Phillips Lovecraft ed è considerato uno dei più importanti appartenenti al cosiddetto Ciclo di Cthulhu. ...
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Hole in My Soul – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message) 1997 single by AerosmithHole in My SoulSingle by Aerosmithfrom the album Nine Lives B-sideFalling OffReleasedAugust 5, 1997Recorded1996Genr...
Berthold LaskerBertold (kanan) dan Emanuel Lasker menganalisis papan catur pada tahun 1908 (foto oleh Frank Eugene)Nama lengkapJonathan Berthold LaskerAsal negara JermanLahir(1860-12-31)31 Desember 1860Berlinchen, Jerman(kini Barlinek, Polandia)Meninggal19 Oktober 1928(1928-10-19) (umur 67) Berthold Lasker, Else Lasker-Schüler, Anna Lindwurm-Lindner, Franz Lindwurm-Lindner pada sekitar tahun 1900 Berthold Lasker (bernama lahir Jonathan Berthold Barnett)[1] (31 Des...
American judge (born 1962) This article is about the judge. For the psychologist, see Robin S. Rosenberg. Not to be confused with Robin S. Rosenbaum. Robin L. RosenbergJudge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaIncumbentAssumed office July 24, 2014Appointed byBarack ObamaPreceded byAdalberto Jordan Personal detailsBornRobin Lee Rosenberg (1962-01-22) January 22, 1962 (age 62)West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.EducationPrinceton University (BA)Duke Univer...
烏克蘭總理Прем'єр-міністр України烏克蘭國徽現任杰尼斯·什米加尔自2020年3月4日任命者烏克蘭總統任期總統任命首任維托爾德·福金设立1991年11月后继职位無网站www.kmu.gov.ua/control/en/（英文） 乌克兰 乌克兰政府与政治系列条目 宪法 政府 总统 弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基 總統辦公室 国家安全与国防事务委员会 总统代表（英语：Representatives of the President of Ukraine） 总...
Cet article est une ébauche concernant la Grèce et l’histoire. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant (comment ?) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Province de l'Epire en orange La révolte épirote de 1854 est un soulèvement nationaliste grec qui éclate en Épire, alors une province ottomane, le pachalik de Ioannina, au moment de la Guerre de Crimée (1853-1856). Cette révolte reçoit un important soutien de l'opinion publique du royaume de...
Unfinished novel by Jane Austen The description of the ball in Jane Austen's manuscript The Watsons is an abandoned novel by Jane Austen, probably begun about 1803. There have been a number of arguments advanced as to why she did not complete it, and other authors have since attempted the task. A continuation by Austen's niece was published in 1850. The manuscript fragment itself was published in 1871. Further completions and adaptations of the story have continued to the present day. History...
CCTV-2 财经CCTV-2 KeuanganDiluncurkan1 Mei 1973PemilikChina Central TelevisionNegara Republik Rakyat TiongkokSitus webCCTV-2Televisi InternetCNTV Ai BuguCCTV-2 CCTV-2 adalah saluran keuangan (sebelumnya saluran ekonomi hingga 24 Agustus 2009) yang terfokus pada jaringan CCTV (China Central Television) di Republik Rakyat Tiongkok. Fokus utama dari saluran ini adalah: Konservasi energi Bursa saham Permainan Beberapa acara 8:00 AM: 第一时间, First Focus 11:50 AM: 全球资讯榜, Global In...
Part of a series aboutImperialism studies Theories Dependency theory Intercommunalism Neo-Gramscianism Neocolonialism Social imperialism Super-imperialism Three Worlds Theory Ultra-imperialism World-systems theory Concepts Ecologically unequal exchange North–South model Unequal exchange Superprofit Uneven and combined development People Samir Amin Giovanni Arrighi Paul A. Baran Charles Bettelheim Ľuboš Blaha Nikolai Bukharin Arghiri Emmanuel John Bellamy Foster Andre Gunder Frank Michael ...
IWBF World ChampionshipsChampionnats du monde de basket-ball en fauteuil roulant Généralités Sport Basket-ball en fauteuil roulant Création 19731990 Organisateur(s) International Wheelchair Basketball Federation Catégorie Mondiale Périodicité Tous les 4 ans (depuis 1986) Participants 16 nations (depuis 2014) 12 nations (depuis 2014) Palmarès Tenant du titre Grande-Bretagne Pays-Bas Plus titré(s) États-Unis (6) Canada (5) Pour la dernière compétition voir : Championnat d...
This article is about the American city. For the Russian city, see Saint Petersburg. St. Petersburg, United States redirects here. For other places in the United States, see Saint Petersburg (disambiguation) § Places. City in Florida, United StatesSt. PetersburgCity St. Petersburg Skyline ㅤ Salvador Dali MuseumSunshine Skyway BridgeSt. Petersburg PierVinoy ParkMuseum of Fine Arts (St. Petersburg, Florida)Tropicana FieldMahaffey TheaterSunken Gardens FlagSealNickname(s): St. Pete;...
