Hello, thank you for creating the above mentioned draft, as I've previously created it and left it to rot it is still on my watchlist. Jxmmi was not featured on "Throw Sum Mo" and other listed recordings as he is the primary artist as a member of Rae Sremmurd, and would please not overlink names, if you already mentioned Mike Will Made It before please don't link it again because as much as your draft is promising it might not get accepted and might require clean up first. Otherwise, good job. dxneo (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you don't have to mention every song he was featured on, only breakthrough songs like "No Flex Zone" and "No Type" will do, you may mention studio albums. Featured songs can be listed under the discography section Thank you dxneo (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Rae Sremmurd. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.

Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slim Jxmmi, and a history of questionable recreation.

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Rae Sremmurd. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Rae Sremmurd.

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide..

This title is a locked redirect, and will require admin action to unlock, or to accept this draft, so a very strong case will need to be made for acceptance of this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slim Jxmmi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert McClenon, I happen to disagree with you on the subject not being suitable for a standalone article due to no SIGCOV and such, see this and tell me if it's just "passing mention(s)". He has been the subject of multiple independent news articles here, here, here, here, and probably more since I can't cite the whole internet. I like feel you judged the draft based on its previously AFD'd article. I strongly urge you to reconsider, I'll be on the lookout for your response Thank you. dxneo (talk) 10:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2RDD, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zerry DL, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zerry DL.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: Okay, cool. Y'all should discuss the issue, If it's delete then delete and if it's to Keep then keep it. I humble myself because you all are better then me here.. Thank You.. I will keep improving.. 2RDD (talk) 07:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2RDD, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Neville Records, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Records.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2RDDD, please I need help understanding why an article (Draft:Tochi Bright Clement) I submitted for review has been in process for the past 12 hours. Please I need you to check it out for me please. Thank you for your time. Greybliss (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Greybliss: That draft need to be deleted; it is full of promotions and primary sources. Pls do not write about yourself which may generate conflict of interest. The draft Is now marked for deletion and it may be marked for non-creation again. I suggest you leave the article and study the rules and regulations on Wikipedia. Thank You! And Secondly, why did you use its real name? You suppose to create with stage name..2RDD (talk) 10:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2RDD

Thank you for the advice. Plus I created the draft in my sandbox, it was moved to this page by a bot admin when I submitted it for review Greybliss (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2RDD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2RDD. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=2RDD|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Various articles. Your very first edit clearly do not look like a very first edit either. Graywalls (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not receive payments for my edits please, I'm here only to contribute to Wikipedia; Thank You! And God Bless You!!! @Graywalls 2RDD (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plutomania Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plutomania Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Graywalls (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why the proposal for speedy deletion 102.90.101.99 (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qing Madi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, This is to notify you that the Draft article you created two months ago on Draft:Cubana Chief Priest has been moved to Mainspace by me on Cubana Chief Priest. I wished to continue to expand the article from there. Chat Term talk 15:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cubana Chief Priest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubana Chief Priest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slim Jxmmi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Are You Gone Already, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ByronMessia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2RDD, hope you are fine? I tried requesting for change of username because our user name accidentally looks alike and also I requested it because you came to Wikipedia before me and also to avoid any issues, please can you request change of name because it didn't work for me for some reason. 75DD (talk) 13:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@75DD: Never!!! Because I'm older here. You could leave it and avoid conflict. Bro or what gender you are, I think you took from my name. I ain't no JJC. Go and request again. Thank You!!! 2RDD (talk) 14:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving it is fine and how I wish your gmail was opened I would've cleared you there because the explanation goes with a personal stuff. Why do I want to make similar name with some one on Wikipedia? It's not making sense bro 75DD (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@75DD: To be able to change your name visit this place [1] 2RDD (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2RDD Hello Trust You Are Doing Fine ? First of all i would like to state that coming to my talkpage to rain insult on me is highly unproffesional and not acceptable because of an edit i made on the article Verydarkman you tagged stub which as an editor we are suppose to expand.

According to Wikipedia's guidelines, any registered editor has the right to edit or make changes to almost any page, provided that these edits are supported by reliable citations. Threatening to block me for making changes that I believe are accurate is both unacceptable and unprofessional. Wikipedia is not a private blog or a personal website where individual preferences dictate content. It is a collaborative platform where contributions are made in good faith, and edits are based on verifiable sources. Blocking me undermines the fundamental principle of Wikipedia, which is to create a comprehensive and balanced repository of knowledge through the collective efforts of its community. It is essential to respect this collaborative nature and address disagreements through discussion and consensus, rather than resorting to threats and unilateral actions . Afrowriter (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Afrowriter: I understand you want to expand but when expanding try to use reliable sources all else Unreliable source tag would be placed on it. Leave the article Verydarkman for now. In the future we will expand it. But not now. Simple as that. And two: You are not writing neutral point of view. 2RDD (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2RDD You cannot dismiss top Nigerian news platforms like Premium Times, Vanguard, Channels TV, and Daily Times as unreliable sources. These are well-respected publications with a track record of accurate reporting. Despite not being from Nigeria, my extensive experience writing for Wikipedia allows me to confidently assert that the sources I used are credible and reliable sources. Asking me not to contribute to an article you created, especially when my edits are backed by evidence from these credible sources, is against Wikipedia's principles. Wikipedia's rules emphasize the importance of verifiability and the use of reliable sources, regardless of the editor's background. By preventing me from contributing, you are not only undermining these principles but also stifling the collaborative spirit that Wikipedia thrives on. It's essential to respect the guidelines and allow contributions that enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of articles. Afrowriter (talk) 08:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2RDD Wikipedia guidelines emphasize the importance of reliable sources. Reliable sources are typically those that have editorial oversight, are peer-reviewed, or are recognized as authoritative in their field. These include academic journals, reputable news outlets, and recognized experts. When changes are made to an article based on such sources, they enhance the credibility and accuracy of the content. also changes made to the article which were backed with reliable sources we be reverted as Wikipedia is not a private website or biography blog space where you make edit based how you feel it should be when its supposed to be based on information found on this notable platforms. Afrowriter (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2RDD, I read the messages you left on Afrowrtier's talk page. You have to remain civil when you're communicating with other editors. Words like "fuck" is not civil at all. Moving forward, I suggest you speak to this person in a calm tone. Perhaps, do not respond to them in the heat of the moment. You don't have any power to block other editors. If Afrowriter does something that isn't right, try to resolve the issue via communication. If you feel like the issue cannot be resolve between you two, then you can report him to an administrator.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 14:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all, @Versace1608 @2RDD

I am writing to address the recent deletions and reverts on the VeryDarkMan page. I believe that the content I have contributed adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines, specifically the principles of verifiability, neutrality, and no original research.

I have made a concerted effort to maintain a neutral tone throughout my contributions. My intention has been to present facts without bias, providing a balanced view of the subject........ The content I added is based on previously published material. I have not included any original analysis or synthesis of the information, strictly adhering to Wikipedia’s policy.

Despite these efforts, my edits have been repeatedly removed. I am reaching out to request a collaborative discussion to resolve these differences. It is important that we work together to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s standards and provides accurate information to its readers.

This was the edit i made

Martins Vincent Otse (born 8 April 1994), popularly known as VeryDarkMan, is a Nigerian activist, controversial figure, critic and social media influencer. He gained significant attention within the Nigerian online community, particularly for his contentious and often debated statements on various topics, including the 2023 Death of MohBad case.

I appreciate your cooperation and look forward to resolving this matter amicably.

Best regards, Afrowriter (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Afrowriter: I just saw the edit you made to the article, the one that 2RDD undid. For starters, "controversial figure" should not be listed among VDM's other occupations. VDM is a Nigerian activist and social media influencer who has made a few controversial remarks in the past. If you take a look at the articles of several people who have made controversial remarks (Andrew Tate, Kanye West, etc), you will not see "controversial figure" listed side by side with their other occupation. You can definitely mention some of his controversial commentary in the article's body and perhaps summed it up in the lede. However, I do not think it is right to label him a controversial figure since it isn't the norm on Wikipedia. In your revision to the article, you said "He gained significant attention within the Nigerian online community, particularly for his contentious and often debated statements on various topics, including the 2023 Death of MohBad case". This particular statement isn't supported by the sources you cited. The Legit source does not state that VDM gained significant attention for commenting on Mohbad's autopsy results. The way you worded your statement, you make it look like VDM gained recognition and became popular for commenting on Mohbad's autopsy results and for being happy that Naira Marley and Sam Larry were released. Per these sources, VDM was already popular. His comments on these two stories did not make him popular or get him recognition. If you insist on adding your statement to the article, I recommend you find sources that explicitly support your statement. I don't see anything wrong with 2RDD undoing your edit. Like I said, feel free to include VDM's controversial commentary in the article's body and a summary of it in the lede. Just make sure that whatever statement you include in the VDM article is backed by a reliable source.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

noted thanks Afrowriter (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Afrowriter: I think this write-up was generated by AI. When commenting, make it humanly. Thank you and God Bless. 2RDD (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI ?? bro what do u take me for ? Afrowriter (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Versace1608: Okay, I will tryna be calm, but he keep Vandalizing the article. And two: Let him improve. 2RDD (talk) 09:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marjorie Harvey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2RDD. Thank you for your work on Gloss Up. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rema (musician), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Topping, Rema and Mainstream.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Slim Jxmmi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shallipopi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stubborn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North West (rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Marjorie Harvey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "North West".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julio Foolio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Affiliation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samantha Irvin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Funny Marco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Notti Osama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lil Tecca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taz Taylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Samantha Irvin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @2RDD Trust You are doing ok

Thank you for your work on Benin Boys , The article has been changed from B-Class to Start-Class, as indicated on its talk page. Most articles begin as Stub-Class or Start-Class and progress to higher ratings as they are develop over time. You may want to consult the grading scheme to find ways to enhance the article's quality.

thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! I hope you will continue making quality contributions. Afro 📢Talk! 08:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Afrowriter, sorry for intrusion. I think the article is currently at C-class approaching B. It is adequately sourced and a bit expanded, can't be start-class. dxneo (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dxneo @2RDD Apologies for the confusion earlier. I have reassessed the article and regraded it as C-Class. I was a bit overwhelmed and surprised when I initially found it rated as B-Class. Afro 📢Talk! 08:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2RDD The article has been reassessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Afro 📢Talk! 08:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Notti Osama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Qing Madi (EP)

added a link pointing to Strength

Ravage (EP)

added a link pointing to Iniquity

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qing Madi (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strength.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please I want to know why you nominated the article for speedy deletion Spaceteez (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the reason is there 2RDD (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]