This article is about the former United States federal judge. For the merchant and politician in Lower Canada, see Thomas Porteous (merchant). For the England international footballer, see Tom Porteous.
Porteous ruled in several landmark cases against the state, including one 2002 case in which he ruled that the state of Louisiana was illegally using federal money to promote religion in its abstinence-only sex education programs.[3] He ordered the state to stop giving money to individuals or organizations that "convey religious messages or otherwise advance religion" with tax dollars.[3] Judge Porteous also said there was ample evidence that many of the groups participating in the Governor's Program on Abstinence were "furthering religious objectives."[4] Those who supported such groups objected to his ruling.
In 2001, Porteous filed for bankruptcy,[7][8] which led to revelations in the press about his private life, specifically the fact that he was alleged to have had close ties with local bail bondmagnate Louis Marcotte III,[7][8] at the center of a corruption probe. Porteous himself was the subject of investigation by federal investigators.[7][8]
In May 2006, Porteous, beset by the recent loss of his home due to Hurricane Katrina in August 2005,[7][8] and the death of his wife a few months later,[7][8] and still under investigation by a federal grand jury, was granted temporary medical leave and began a year-long furlough from the federal bench.[7][8]
Impeachment proceedings
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
On June 18, 2008, the Judicial Conference of the United States transmitted a certificate to the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives expressing the Conference's determination that consideration of impeachment of Porteous might be warranted.[9] The certificate stated that there was substantial evidence that Porteous "repeatedly committed perjury by signing false financial disclosure forms under oath," thus concealing "cash and things of value that he solicited and received from lawyers appearing in litigation before him."[10]
In a specific case,
he denied a motion to recuse based on his relationship with lawyers in the case . . . and failed to disclose that the lawyers in question had often provided him with cash. Thereafter, while a bench verdict (that is, a verdict by a judge sitting without a jury) was pending, he solicited and received from the lawyers appearing before him illegal gratuities in the form of cash and other things of value
thus depriving "the public of its right to his honest services."[10] The certificate concluded that this conduct "constituted an abuse of his judicial office" in violation of the Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.[11]
The certificate also stated that there was substantial evidence that Porteous had "repeatedly committed perjury by signing false financial disclosure forms under oath" in connection with his bankruptcy, allowing "him to obtain a discharge of his debts while continuing his lifestyle at the expense of his creditors."[10] Further, he had "made false representations to gain the extension of a bank loan with the intent to defraud the bank."[11]
Investigation
On September 18, 2008, the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to proceed with an investigation of the bribery and perjury allegations.[12][13] On October 15, 2008, House Judiciary Chair John Conyers announced that Alan I. Barron had been hired as Special Counsel[14] to lead an inquiry into Porteous's impeachment. Representatives Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) were designated as Chair and Ranking Member, respectively, to lead the task force conducting the inquiry.[14] Three months later, the House passed via voice vote a Conyers-sponsored resolution authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to run an impeachment inquiry into whether the House should impeach Porteous.[15] The resolution was needed because the previous year's investigation had ended with the previous Congress.[16] In October 2009, Reps. Conyers and Lamar S. Smith introduced a resolution[17] asking to access the judge's tax returns as part of the investigation.[18] The resolution was referred to the Rules Committee[17][18] and, at the same time, a timeframe was established which called for the investigation to end in November 2009; the Judicial Impeachment Task Force would decide by the end of the year if impeachment would be recommended to the Judiciary Committee. If the recommendation was for impeachment, the Committee would take up the matter in early 2010.[18] The task force scheduled the first hearings on the case for November 17 and 18, with more meetings in December before a final recommendation was made.[19]
Impeachment
On November 13, Porteous sued the task force, claiming that the panel was violating his Fifth Amendment rights by using testimony given under immunity in making the case against him.[20] On January 21, 2010, the panel voted unanimously to recommend four articles of impeachment to the full Judiciary Committee,[21] which, on January 27, voted to send the articles of impeachment to the full House.[22] On March 4, 2010, the full Committee reported H.Res. 1031, a resolution of impeachment of Porteous, to the full House. The full House considered the impeachment resolution on March 11, 2010, and voted to adopt all four articles, all of which passed unanimously, becoming the third of only three unanimous impeachment votes; the first was Harry E. Claiborne and the second was Walter Nixon. The subjects of the articles of impeachment, and the corresponding vote of the House of Representatives, appear below:
Article I – engaging in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge – Passed the House by a vote of 412–0.[23]
Article II – engaged in a longstanding pattern of corrupt conduct that demonstrates his unfitness to serve as a United States District Court Judge – Passed the House by a vote of 410–0.[24]
Article III – knowingly and intentionally making false statements, under penalty of perjury, related to his personal bankruptcy filing and violating a bankruptcy court order – Passed the House by a vote of 416–0.[25]
Article IV – knowingly made material false statements about his past to both the United States Senate and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in order to obtain the office of United States District Court Judge – Passed the House by a vote of 423–0.[26]
The same day, Representatives Adam Schiff (D-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Hank Johnson (D-GA), Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), and Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) were appointed managers to conduct the trial in the Senate.[27] In addition, Schiff and Goodlatte were designated as the lead managers.[28] The articles of impeachment were sent to the Senate, where the proceedings were started on March 17.[29] On that same day, Senators passed two resolutions: one provided for a summons for Porteous to answer the articles against him,[30] and the other provided for a committee to analyze the evidence against him and report their findings to the full Senate.[31] Senators Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) were designated as Chair and Vice Chair of the committee, respectively.[32] The committee met on April 16. The trial was due to begin in early August, with a vote before the Senate happening in late September, but due to delays, it did not begin until mid-September, with a vote scheduled for December 8, 2010.[33]
Trial
On December 7, 2010, the full Senate began hearing the impeachment trial. Senate President pro temporeDaniel Inouye presided over the trial. Jonathan Turley, acting in Judge Porteous's defense, announced that Judge Porteous had decided to leave the federal bench in 2011 were he not removed from office.
The following day, the Senate voted unanimously to convict Porteous on the first of four impeachment charges, removing him from the bench, before subsequently convicting him on the remaining three articles. In a separate vote, per a motion by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Senate disqualified Porteous from ever holding "any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States" again. He is one of only three former federal officers to be permanently banned from holding federal office after being impeached and removed, the others being West Hughes Humphreys and Robert W. Archbald.
Article I – engaging in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge – Convicted in the Senate by a vote of 96–0.[34]
Article II – engaged in a longstanding pattern of corrupt conduct that demonstrates his unfitness to serve as a United States District Court Judge – Convicted in the Senate by a vote of 69–27.[35]
Article III – knowingly and intentionally making false statements, under penalty of perjury, related to his personal bankruptcy filing and violating a bankruptcy court order – Convicted in the Senate by a vote of 88–8.[36]
Article IV – knowingly made material false statements about his past to both the United States Senate and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in order to obtain the office of United States District Court Judge – Convicted in the Senate by a vote of 90–6.[37]
Disqualification – Forever disqualified to hold any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States – Disqualified by the Senate by a vote of 94–2.[38][39]
On January 15, 2011, Porteous gave up his law license in lieu of facing discipline, and agreed to never practice law in Louisiana again. According to the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, Porteous's conviction by the Senate effectively ended his legal career.[40][41]
^ abFinch, Susan; Ritea, Steve (July 26, 2002). "Judge says religious groups got state abstinence grants – Program ordered to keep closer watch". The Times-Picayune. New Orleans. p. B6. A state program to encourage sexual abstinence among adolescents has given money to individuals and groups that promote religion, a practice that violates the U.S. Constitution, a federal judge decided Thursday. Ruling in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous ordered the Governor's Program on Abstinence to stop giving grants to individuals or groups that use the money to convey religious messages "or otherwise advance religion in any way in the course of any event supported in whole or in part" by the program.
^Connolly, Ceci (July 26, 2002). "Judge Orders Changes In Abstinence Program". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 10, 2018. Retrieved April 26, 2010. He said there was ample evidence that many of the groups participating in the Governor's Program on Abstinence were "furthering religious objectives
^ abFinch, Susan (February 5, 2002). "Judge throws out ban on rave gear – Pacifiers, glow sticks are legal". The Times-Picayune. New Orleans. Archived from the original on June 12, 2002. Retrieved October 9, 2009. Banning pacifiers and glow sticks in an effort to curb drug use at all-night raves violates free speech and does not further the government's war on drugs, a federal judge has ruled in permanently blocking federal agents from enforcing the ban. [...] The American Civil Liberties Union, though, said the ban was unconstitutional and challenged it in federal court.
^Gyan, Joe Jr. (September 15, 1999). "State claims abortion restriction attempt to bar infanticide". The Advocate. Baton Rouge. p. B6. U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of New Orleans struck down the dilation and extraction law last March, calling it a "back door effort" to limit a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. The judge agreed with abortion providers that the '97 law, Act 906, is so vague that it effectively covers any and all abortions.
^ abcdefBroach, Drew; Rainey, Richard (December 20, 2007). "Court refers Porteous for impeachment". New Orleans Times-Picayune. Retrieved October 7, 2009. Porteous and his wife, Carmella, sought protection from their creditors under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 2001. They filed the case under the names G.T. Ortous and C.A. Ortous with a post office box address in Harvey. Twelve days later, they amended the papers to use their real names. [...] Federal agents initially unearthed Porteous's alleged misconduct during Operation Wrinkled Robe, which largely centered on the influence of a bail bonds company over judges and jailers in Gretna. [...] Porteous returned to the federal bench in June, after spending a year on disability in the wake of losing his house and his wife and enduring the criminal investigation.
^Duff, James C. (June 18, 2008). "Judicial Conference of the United States Determination"(PDF). Judicial Conference of the United States. Archived from the original(PDF) on May 22, 2011. Retrieved August 21, 2009. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 355(b)(1), the Judicial Conference of the United States certifies to the House of Representatives its determination that consideration of impeachment of United States District Judge G. Thomas Porteous (E.D. La.) may be warranted.
^Alpert, Bruce (January 13, 2009). "House votes to renew impeachment probe of Judge Porteous". New Orleans Times-Picayune. Retrieved October 7, 2009. The House of Representatives Tuesday authorized its Judiciary Committee to continue its unfinished impeachment investigation of Louisiana federal judge Thomas Porteous. [...] But the committee didn't complete the investigation before the 110th Congress adjourned at the end of 2008 and by rule all impeachment investigations must be authorized by the current Congress.
^Staff reporter (March 11, 2010). "House votes to impeach federal judge from Louisiana". CNN. Retrieved April 24, 2010. After the impeachment vote, Schiff and Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, were named the lead impeachment managers for the Senate trial, which will decide whether to remove Porteous from the bench. (Archived by WebCite at https://www.webcitation.org/5pE0afpen )
^Memoli, Michael A. (December 9, 2010). "Senate convicts Louisiana federal judge in impeachment trial". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 9, 2010. The Senate also voted to bar him from ever holding public office in the future... The vote on the first count was unanimous, 96–0. On subsequent counts, the votes were 69–27, 88–8, and 90–6. Impeachment required a vote of two-thirds of the Senate.