Filming began on February 23, 2015, in London. Both Mazur and Cranston received executive producer credits. The film premiered at the Tampa Theatre on July 6, 2016 and was released the following week in theaters. The film received a generally positive response from critics, but a poor response from audiences, as it grossed $22 million against a budget of $28–$47 million.
Cranston and Leguizamo previously worked together in The Lincoln Lawyer, which Furman directed.
Filming
Filming was previously set to begin in March 2015 in Tampa, Florida, but then moved to London and Paris.[11] According to SSN Insider, filming began on February 23, 2015.[12] On March 11, 2015, the studio confirmed that filming was underway in London and released a first-look image from the film.[5]
The production moved to Florida at the end of April;[5] filming began in Tampa on April 22, 2015, on location at Port Tampa Bay.[13][14] On April 28, 2015, they filmed in Parkland Estates, near the former home of Santo Trafficante, an infamous Tampa mob boss.[citation needed]
Reception
Box office
In the United States and Canada, The Infiltrator opened on Wednesday, July 13, 2016, and was projected to gross $5–8 million from 1,600 theaters in its opening five days.[15] The film grossed $773,761 on its first day and $5.3 million in its opening weekend (a five-day total of $6.7 million), finishing eighth at the box office.[3]
Critical response
As of June 2020[update], the film holds a 72% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 179 reviews and an average rating of 6.4/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "The Infiltrator's compelling fact-based story and tremendously talented cast are often just enough to balance out its derivative narrative and occasionally clunky execution."[16] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 66 out of 100, based on 38 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[17] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A−" on an A+ to F scale.[18]
Lawsuit
In 2016, Javier Ospina Baraya sued Robert Mazur and the makers of the film for what he alleged was an erroneous impression given of him.[19] In 2019 the Florida State Appeals Court ruled the suit could proceed.[20]