During a sweltering summer in New York City, 13-year-old Mister's (Skylan Brooks) hard-living mother (Hudson) is apprehended by the police, leaving the boy and nine-year-old Pete (Dizon) alone to forage for food while dodging police and various hostile residents while awaiting a child-actor casting call. Faced with more than any child can be expected to bear, the resourceful Mister nevertheless feels he is an unstoppable force against seemingly immovable obstacles. But what really keeps the pair in the survival game is Mister's intelligence and perseverance.
The Inevitable Defeat of Mister & Pete made $260,000 from 147 theaters in its opening weekend, an average of $1,769 per venue.[7][8] The film ultimately grossed $494,608 in the United States and Canada, and $11,695 in other territories, for a worldwide total of $506,303.[1][2]
Critical response
On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 84% of 38 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.9/10. The website's consensus reads: "The Inevitable Defeat of Mister & Pete uses its compelling streetwise setting — and powerful performances from its young leads — to offer a refreshing twist on the coming-of-age formula."[9]Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 61 out of 100, based on 16 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.[10]
Manohla Dargis of The New York Times wrote, "There are times in The Inevitable Defeat of Mister & Pete when the emotions it stirs up are so naked and unembarrassed that it feels as if you've entered a cinematic time machine back to the silent era." Dargis also commented that Tillman "does lovely work here, particularly with the actors, even if his insistent ebullience can feel like a sales pitch."[11]
Michael O'Sullivan of The Washington Post highlighted the performances of Brooks and Dizon, feeling that they "outshine their older colleagues" and "carry the weight of the film on their bony shoulders, with Brooks bearing the lion's share of the acting challenges."[12]
Betsy Sharkey of the Los Angeles Times called the film "a moving bit of mischief and mayhem that will break your heart, give you hope, make you laugh, possibly cry" and opined, "Mister and Pete are the film's secret weapon, richly drawn characters so well acted that they go a long way to overshadow its failings."[13]
John Anderson of Variety remarked, "A pair of precociously charming perfs and a gritty sense of street can't prevent The Inevitable Defeat of Mister and Pete from wading into soggy sentiment. […] The pic simply moves from one strife-filled episode to another."[14]
David Rooney of The Hollywood Reporter stated, "The big problem here is that not much happens in the protracted midsection. Tillman and Starrbury fail to instill dramatic forward motion, so the film idles for much of its running time, relying on the not inconsiderable charms of young actors Brooks and Dizon."[15]
Nathan Rabin of The Dissolve wrote, "The Inevitable Defeat Of Mister & Pete is on sure footing when it focuses on the sorrowful plight of its protagonists, particularly Brooks, who delivers a performance rich in anger, sadness, and confusion, but devoid of sentimentality. […] But even though the grubby street melodrama on the periphery sometimes rings false, and the filmmakers sometime overreach, the film's core feels true."[16]
Peter Sobczynski of RogerEbert.com gave the film 2 out of 4 stars and noted, "For the most part, however, the film is just never quite as powerful or moving as it clearly wants to be, and though it tries to avoid mawkishness throughout, it winds up succumbing to it."[17]
Eric Kohn of IndieWire gave the film a grade of "C+" and opined, "Starrbury's screenplay lacks a cohesive means of channeling their conundrum into an involving dramatic arc, so that by the time the movie arrives at the apex of its dramatic incidents, they've been anticipated for so long that the finale comes across as an afterthought. While not without its touching moments, Mister and Pete is inevitably defeated by its own good intentions."[18]
