This template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Do we need two sections each for Sunni and Shia? I'm assuming one is more important and the bottom is for modern or obscure work. --Zimriel (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","author":"Zimriel","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z-Two_sections","replies":["c-Chongkian-2022-03-08T02:58:00.000Z-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z"]}}-->
There are Sunni and Shia sections already, in addition to other sections as well. Chongkian (talk) 02:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-08T02:58:00.000Z","author":"Chongkian","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Chongkian-2022-03-08T02:58:00.000Z-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-The_new_ones-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z-The_new_ones"],"text":"The new ones","linkableTitle":"The new ones"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-The_new_ones-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z-The_new_ones"],"text":"The new ones","linkableTitle":"The new ones"}-->
I have added Ayyashi, Qummi, and and Furat al-Kufi. I view Ayyashi and Qummi as important because they're used a lot by Orientalists, and also because they were used a lot by Tabrisi. Also I see that someone else has added Tusi and Safi; Tusi would belong before Tabrisi too.
Re, Safi and Furat al-Kufi: although they are used by Orientalists, they seem not as important to the Shia. Thoughts on including their work at all? Where to put it? --Zimriel (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC); updated 11 Feb.[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z","author":"Zimriel","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zimriel-2014-02-01T19:22:00.000Z-The_new_ones","replies":[]}}-->
I see the Ahmadiyya has posted some interpretations here... What about the Toledan Collection? Do Christian interpretations count as tafsir? --Zimriel (talk) 05:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-05T05:13:00.000Z","author":"Zimriel","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zimriel-2014-04-05T05:13:00.000Z-Non_Islamic","replies":[]}}-->
I have re-added Ahmadiyya Tafasir. I am in agreement with the view that Christian interpretations do not count as Tafsir. However, your comparison of Christian interpretations with Ahmadiyya Tafasir is unfounded simply because the Ahmadiyya self-identify as Muslims and Christians do not, therefore, within the context of an unbiased encyclopedia, Ahmadiyya exegeses would fall in the category of Tafsir. --User:Sirius86 (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-19T22:38:00.000Z","author":"Sirius86","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sirius86-2015-09-19T22:38:00.000Z-Non_Islamic","replies":[],"displayName":"User:Sirius86"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-HyperGaruda-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Converting_from_vertical_sidebar_to_horizontal_navbox-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-HyperGaruda-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z-Converting_from_vertical_sidebar_to_horizontal_navbox"],"text":"Converting from vertical sidebar to horizontal navbox","linkableTitle":"Converting from vertical sidebar to horizontal navbox"}-->
Converting from vertical sidebar to horizontal navbox
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-HyperGaruda-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Converting_from_vertical_sidebar_to_horizontal_navbox-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-HyperGaruda-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z-Converting_from_vertical_sidebar_to_horizontal_navbox"],"text":"Converting from vertical sidebar to horizontal navbox","linkableTitle":"Converting from vertical sidebar to horizontal navbox"}-->
In the next few hours, I will be converting this sidebar template into a horizontal navbox because of WP:TEMPLATECREEP: all the links here lead to book articles, which usually have infoboxes and sometimes other sidebar templates like {{quran}} and {{islam}}. When combined, all these sidebars take up a lot of vertical space which may give additional problems if there are images in the article. - HyperGaruda (talk) 11:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z","author":"HyperGaruda","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HyperGaruda-2015-12-29T11:13:00.000Z-Converting_from_vertical_sidebar_to_horizontal_navbox","replies":[]}}-->
Some dates give the time when the work was written, others give the date of birth and death of the author — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.36.175.217 (talk) 08:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-10-20T08:33:00.000Z","author":"188.36.175.217","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-188.36.175.217-2018-10-20T08:33:00.000Z-Incoherent_dates","replies":[]}}-->