Interesting. Is this based on similar templates for other big tourist destinations?--Hjal 03:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-27T03:56:00.000Z","author":"Hjal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hjal-2007-06-27T03:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-Schmiteye-2007-07-02T02:28:00.000Z-Hjal-2007-06-27T03:56:00.000Z"]}}-->
- I don't know. I just saw this one myself. Schmiteye 02:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-07-02T02:28:00.000Z","author":"Schmiteye","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Schmiteye-2007-07-02T02:28:00.000Z-Hjal-2007-06-27T03:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
your comments positive or negative would be appreciated dm 03:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-13T03:54:00.000Z","author":"Dmadeo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dmadeo-2007-09-13T03:54:00.000Z-Similar_template_up_for_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"dm"}}-->
- results on both: no consensus.
Attractions would be destinations for travellers to the city, not just any topic with an SF connection, such as rice a roni. NOONE ever travelled to sf to eat rice a roni. I will focus the template on articles describing places a traveller would go to. Another template could be created for SF related subjects, but we probably have too many sf templates. go ahead, make my day...(mercurywoodrose)75.61.131.134 (talk) 00:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-02T00:23:00.000Z","author":"75.61.131.134","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-75.61.131.134-2012-04-02T00:23:00.000Z-purpose_of_template","replies":[]}}-->