Template talk:Prime number classes

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes"],"text":"New section for classes of numbers not confirmed to be primes","linkableTitle":"New section for classes of numbers not confirmed to be primes"}-->

New section for classes of numbers not confirmed to be primes

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-137.124.161.51-2016-01-27T21:35:00.000Z-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","timestamp":"2016-01-27T21:35:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__3__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes"],"text":"New section for classes of numbers not confirmed to be primes","linkableTitle":"New section for classes of numbers not confirmed to be primes"}-->

I just read the Industrial-grade prime article. In this template there is a catch-all "Related topics" section. I think this should be fixed. All recommendations welcome. 137.124.161.4 (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","author":"137.124.161.4","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z-New_section_for_classes_of_numbers_not_confirmed_to_be_primes","replies":["c-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:59:00.000Z-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","c-137.124.161.51-2016-01-27T21:35:00.000Z-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Also, I just read the Illegal primes article, and these types of "prime classes" are distinct from the others. A quick reorganization should be completed. I may do it when I get a chance. 137.124.161.4 (talk) 16:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-27T16:59:00.000Z","author":"137.124.161.4","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:59:00.000Z-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
More info @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Classes_of_natural_numbers#Fix_the_layout_of_the_template — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.124.161.51 (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-27T21:35:00.000Z","author":"137.124.161.51","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-137.124.161.51-2016-01-27T21:35:00.000Z-137.124.161.4-2016-01-27T16:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->