Template talk:Politics of Singapore

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Link_to_constituencies-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z-Link_to_constituencies"],"text":"Link to constituencies","linkableTitle":"Link to constituencies"}-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Link_to_constituencies-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z-Link_to_constituencies"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Link_to_constituencies-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z-Link_to_constituencies"],"text":"Link to constituencies","linkableTitle":"Link to constituencies"}-->

I was thinking if it would be more appropriate to edit the constituency link to a page showing the electoral divisions in Singapore, eg List of Singaporean electoral divisions or List of Singaporean constituencies. It would be somewhat similar to List of Australian federal electorates and List of Canadian federal electoral districts. Seems much more logical compared to linking to just group representation constituency and having single member constituency redirected to group representation constituency. What do you guys think? =Travisyoung= 08:47, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z","author":"Travisyoung","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Travisyoung-2005-08-16T08:47:00.000Z-Link_to_constituencies","replies":[],"displayName":"=Travisyoung="}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Image:_coat_of_arms-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z-Image:_coat_of_arms"],"text":"Image: coat of arms","linkableTitle":"Image: coat of arms"}-->

Image: coat of arms

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Image:_coat_of_arms-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z-Image:_coat_of_arms"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Image:_coat_of_arms-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z-Image:_coat_of_arms"],"text":"Image: coat of arms","linkableTitle":"Image: coat of arms"}-->

I replace the coat of arms image because its use is very restrictive. Please refer to Coat of arms of Singapore for information. Because, the template is shown in articles such as political parties, I feel it is inappropriate to show the coat of arm in these articles. I replace it with a free image of the Parliament building. --Vsion 16:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC) OK Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 21:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z","author":"Vsion","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vsion-2006-03-05T16:59:00.000Z-Image:_coat_of_arms","replies":[]}}-->