This template is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Why isn't this template a box?129.31.72.5209:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-29T09:42:00.000Z","author":"129.31.72.52","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-129.31.72.52-2007-05-29T09:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-Anthony_Appleyard-2007-05-29T12:51:00.000Z-129.31.72.52-2007-05-29T09:42:00.000Z"]}}-->
Because it is intended to make an ordinary ==section== in the host article. Anthony Appleyard12:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-29T12:51:00.000Z","author":"Anthony Appleyard","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Anthony_Appleyard-2007-05-29T12:51:00.000Z-129.31.72.52-2007-05-29T09:42:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Generally, it seems that a navbox is preferred when you have a list of links to other related articles, (see WP:NAV and Ice II). I don't know why this needs to be an ordinary section; if you have a special reason please tell us, otherwise, if no one objects in a couple of days, I'll go ahead and replace this template. Jkasd (talk) 16:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-22T16:44:00.000Z","author":"Jkasd","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jkasd-2008-03-22T16:44:00.000Z-Navbox","replies":[]}}-->
I've added groups to the navbox, if anything is missing or out of place, please fix it. Jkasd (talk) 18:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-25T18:55:00.000Z","author":"Jkasd","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jkasd-2008-03-25T18:55:00.000Z-Navbox","replies":[]}}-->
I've updated the template to a navbox. Here is the old version:
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Jkasd-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Other_organic_chemical_word_components-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jkasd-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","c-Ish_ishwar-2008-12-28T06:27:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","c-Anthony_Appleyard-2008-12-28T06:56:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components"],"text":"Other organic chemical word components","linkableTitle":"Other organic chemical word components"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Jkasd-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Other_organic_chemical_word_components-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jkasd-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","c-Ish_ishwar-2008-12-28T06:27:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","c-Anthony_Appleyard-2008-12-28T06:56:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components"],"text":"Other organic chemical word components","linkableTitle":"Other organic chemical word components"}-->
Obviously, one could continue creating pages for every organic chemistry affix (e.g. meth-, eth-, prop-, cis-, trans-, etc.), but this begs the question, when do we stop? Do we even need the ones here? I'm starting to think that most of these pages are unnecessary. Jkasd (talk) 22:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z","author":"Jkasd","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jkasd-2008-03-26T22:42:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","replies":[]}}-->
Right. This information should be in wiktionary not wikipedia. All prefixes belonging to any topic can be categorized there. – ishwar(speak)06:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-28T06:27:00.000Z","author":"Ish ishwar","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ish_ishwar-2008-12-28T06:27:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","replies":[],"displayName":"ishwar"}}-->
Or we could merge them all into one page about components of organic chemical names, but keep it on Wikipedia. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-28T06:56:00.000Z","author":"Anthony Appleyard","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Anthony_Appleyard-2008-12-28T06:56:00.000Z-Other_organic_chemical_word_components","replies":[]}}-->