This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Jarble-20240302153400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Classical_vs._non-classical_modal_logics-20240302153400","replies":["c-Jarble-20240302153400-Classical_vs._non-classical_modal_logics"],"text":"Classical vs. non-classical modal logics","linkableTitle":"Classical vs. non-classical modal logics"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Jarble-20240302153400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Classical_vs._non-classical_modal_logics-20240302153400","replies":["c-Jarble-20240302153400-Classical_vs._non-classical_modal_logics"],"text":"Classical vs. non-classical modal logics","linkableTitle":"Classical vs. non-classical modal logics"}-->
@Botterweg14: This template included modal logic because this article describes modal logic as non-classical. But some modal logics are not non-classical; should the article explain this distinction? Jarble (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240302153400","author":"Jarble","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jarble-20240302153400-Classical_vs._non-classical_modal_logics","replies":[]}}-->
