This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States This template is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government. Espionage NSA surveillance is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage Politics: American This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics This template is supported by American politics task force. Mass surveillance NSA surveillance is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance

The map is old and somewhat limited. It is also meaningless without a key. I suggest a different image is picked. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 19:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-03T19:46:00.000Z","author":"Rich Farmbrough","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-03T19:46:00.000Z-Map","replies":["c-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-08T21:57:00.000Z-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-03T19:46:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Rich"}}-->

I am removing the map. If anyone wants to Revert and Discuss, feel free. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 21:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-08T21:57:00.000Z","author":"Rich Farmbrough","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-08T21:57:00.000Z-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-03T19:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Rezonansowy-2014-11-10T19:36:00.000Z-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-08T21:57:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Rich"}}-->

@Rich Farmbrough: But the key is available under the caption link – see Boundless Informant. --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 19:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-11-10T19:36:00.000Z","author":"Rezonansowy","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Rezonansowy-2014-11-10T19:36:00.000Z-Rich_Farmbrough-2014-04-08T21:57:00.000Z","replies":["c-Rezonansowy-2014-11-11T10:23:00.000Z-Rezonansowy-2014-11-10T19:36:00.000Z"]}}-->

The key I refer to is the one linking the colours to the numbers. I opposed deleting the image for having no key (see the en:WP talk page for the image) but I cannot support having it in this sidebar. It conveys nothing, it is a map of the world with some green and some red on it. Even with an explanation it represents a snapshot of statistics for one of many NSA programs, and an outdated snapshot at that. It is in no way symbolic of the NSA. I am not arguing that it is not an important document, but that it is not a recognisable or informative symbol for a sidebar. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC).

I noted that the one thing which wrong, is that is outdated. But IMO this map is pretty appropriate for this. @Xanchester: you created this template with a map, I vectorised. Do you agree with me? --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 10:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-11-11T10:23:00.000Z","author":"Rezonansowy","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Rezonansowy-2014-11-11T10:23:00.000Z-Rezonansowy-2014-11-10T19:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-Rezonansowy-2014-12-21T08:43:00.000Z-Rezonansowy-2014-11-11T10:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

OK, I'm restoring this per WP:SILENCE. --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 08:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-12-21T08:43:00.000Z","author":"Rezonansowy","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Rezonansowy-2014-12-21T08:43:00.000Z-Rezonansowy-2014-11-11T10:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You have not addressed my concerns:

• It conveys nothing, it is a map of the world with some green and some red on it.
• Even with an explanation it represents a snapshot of statistics for one of many NSA programs, and an outdated snapshot at that.
• It is in no way symbolic of the NSA.
• It is a waste of real-estate in the articles using the sidebar.

I would argue that it is also verging on, if not actually, NPOV, or at least WP:UNDUE if sufficient explanation were provided.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC).

Whistleblower status is a legal definition, with a defined system of protection, and he never fit such status. Leaking classified documents does not immediately qualify someone under any Whistleblower protection. 𝓦𝓲𝓴𝓲𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓘𝓼𝓝𝓸𝓽𝓟𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓮𝔀𝓮𝓭-𝓟𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓮𝔀𝓮𝓭𝓜𝓮𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓮𝔀𝓮𝓭𝓑𝔂𝓟𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓵𝔂 (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220820200300","author":"Tgm1024","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tgm1024-20220820200300-Why_is_Edward_Snowden_listed_as_a_\"whistleblower\"?_He_is_not.","replies":["c-Walkersam-20240215203900-Tgm1024-20220820200300"],"displayName":"\ud835\udce6\ud835\udcf2\ud835\udcf4\ud835\udcf2\ud835\udcf9\ud835\udcee\ud835\udced\ud835\udcf2\ud835\udcea\ud835\udcd8\ud835\udcfc\ud835\udcdd\ud835\udcf8\ud835\udcfd\ud835\udcdf\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcfb\ud835\udce1\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcff\ud835\udcf2\ud835\udcee\ud835\udd00\ud835\udcee\ud835\udced-\ud835\udcdf\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcfb\ud835\udce1\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcff\ud835\udcf2\ud835\udcee\ud835\udd00\ud835\udcee\ud835\udced\ud835\udcdc\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcea\ud835\udcf7\ud835\udcfc\ud835\udce1\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcff\ud835\udcf2\ud835\udcee\ud835\udd00\ud835\udcee\ud835\udced\ud835\udcd1\ud835\udd02\ud835\udcdf\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcee\ud835\udcfb\ud835\udcfc\ud835\udcde\ud835\udcf7\ud835\udcf5\ud835\udd02"}}-->

It seems "whistleblower means someone covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act" is a recurring refrain from some editors, but it is not supported by usage -- Ralph Nader after all coined the term before any Whistleblower Protections existed. Snowden has explicitly stated he chose to act in the way he did because the case of Russ Tice demonstrated that no effective Whistleblower Protections for NSA employees exist.

It looks like the above editor has been banned or otherwise deleted, but as Snowden is described as a whistleblower in his article I am going to add him back to this template. If anyone else objects, go make your case on the Snowden talk page. Walkersam (talk) 20:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240215203900","author":"Walkersam","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Walkersam-20240215203900-Tgm1024-20220820200300","replies":[]}}-->

why is this caption still being used, in some cases on articles which directly mention, in multiple places, that the key cannot be taken as a literal interpretation of the frequency/ratio of data collection? see Boundless Informant Transgenderoriole (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240527183200","author":"Transgenderoriole","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Transgenderoriole-20240527183200-Map_&_Caption","replies":[]}}-->