Template talk:Mozilla

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles This template is supported by WikiProject Software. Internet This template is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Mozilla Unassessed (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mozilla, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MozillaWikipedia:WikiProject MozillaTemplate:WikiProject MozillaMozilla articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I'm just going to ask this: why does Mozilla have its logotype used atop its navbox, whilst the majority of navboxes have plain text headings? Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 11:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-05-26T11:21:00.000Z","author":"Kevin Steinhardt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kevin_Steinhardt-2012-05-26T11:21:00.000Z-Mozilla_logotype_used_as_navbox_title","replies":["c-Trewyy-2012-08-16T18:05:00.000Z-Kevin_Steinhardt-2012-05-26T11:21:00.000Z"]}}-->

Because we like to innovate. ҭᴙᴇᴡӌӌ 18:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-08-16T18:05:00.000Z","author":"Trewyy","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Trewyy-2012-08-16T18:05:00.000Z-Kevin_Steinhardt-2012-05-26T11:21:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"\u04ad\u1d19\u1d07\u1d21\u04cc\u04cc"}}-->

Should Icedove and Iceowl be there? Comp.arch (talk) 10:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-24T10:13:00.000Z","author":"Comp.arch","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Comp.arch-2013-05-24T10:13:00.000Z-Not_browsers","replies":["c-Tonymec-2014-08-11T15:13:00.000Z-Comp.arch-2013-05-24T10:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

Why shouldn't they? They are mentioned under "Forks", and indeed they are forks (by Debian IIUC) of Mozilla products mentioned elsewhere in the same template. — Tonymec (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-11T15:13:00.000Z","author":"Tonymec","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Tonymec-2014-08-11T15:13:00.000Z-Comp.arch-2013-05-24T10:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Under "Web browser :: Discontinued", the first item is "Calendar Project"; on mouseover, we see that the latter consists of Sunbird and Lightning (both of which, BTW, are mentioned in the top row, "Mozilla Labs"). Now, Sunbird is indeed discontinued, but the Calendar Project lives on as Lightning, which is still maintained as an extension for Thunderbird and SeaMonkey. — Tonymec (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-11T15:08:00.000Z","author":"Tonymec","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tonymec-2014-08-11T15:08:00.000Z-\u201cDiscontinued:_Calendar_Project\u201d","replies":[]}}-->

• include: OpenFlint - open Streaming technology for Firefox OS 'Matchstick' Dongle ~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 02:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-25T02:00:00.000Z","author":"Xb2u7Zjzc32","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Xb2u7Zjzc32-2015-02-25T02:00:00.000Z-OpenFlint","replies":[]}}-->