This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This template is supported by the science and academia work group. Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles Mathematics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles

I made this so one can add someone to both Category:People stubs and Category:Math stubs easily. —msh210 17:17, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Why does {{Mathematician-stub}} have a picture of Michelangelo's David? I don't understand the connection. --Tabor 01:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-11-29T01:03:00.000Z","author":"Tabor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tabor-2005-11-29T01:03:00.000Z-Image","replies":["c-Valentinian-2005-12-14T15:31:00.000Z-Tabor-2005-11-29T01:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've changed it to one of Pythagoras. It's not ideal, but I think it'll do for the moment. --Valentinian 15:31, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-12-14T15:31:00.000Z","author":"Valentinian","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Valentinian-2005-12-14T15:31:00.000Z-Tabor-2005-11-29T01:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Trovatore-2006-03-19T16:43:00.000Z-Valentinian-2005-12-14T15:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

The Pythagoras image was too hard to make out. I took a detail from a painting of Newton and played around with it a little in ImageMagick to see if I could get something that worked; my attempt is in place.

But to be honest I prefer the David, which is certainly easier to make out than my best effort on Newton. The historical inaccuracy is not the point; the David image to me just said "vaguely classical thinker image", it was easy to see, and it made it easy to see the stub notice (I don't like stub notices with no image as they sort of fade into the article text). The fact that the person depicted wasn't a mathematician was probably an advantage, as that way we don't have to argue over our favorites. --Trovatore 16:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-03-19T16:43:00.000Z","author":"Trovatore","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Trovatore-2006-03-19T16:43:00.000Z-Valentinian-2005-12-14T15:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->