Template talk:Library classification systems

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Straughn-20230326141300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Organize_template?-20230326141300","replies":["c-Straughn-20230326141300-Organize_template?"],"text":"Organize template?","linkableTitle":"Organize template?"}-->

Organize template?

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Straughn-20230326141300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Organize_template?-20230326141300","replies":["c-Straughn-20230326141300-Organize_template?"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Straughn-20230326141300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Organize_template?-20230326141300","replies":["c-Straughn-20230326141300-Organize_template?"],"text":"Organize template?","linkableTitle":"Organize template?"}-->

Should this template perhaps be organized better? Maybe divide into national systems, universal systems, systems for specific materials (Native American materials, government documents), etc.? Any thoughts? Straughn (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230326141300","author":"Straughn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Straughn-20230326141300-Organize_template?","replies":[]}}-->