Template talk:Lagomorpha

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Needs_updates-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z-Needs_updates"],"text":"Needs updates","linkableTitle":"Needs updates"}-->

Needs updates

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Needs_updates-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z-Needs_updates"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Reconrabbit-20241204172000-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","timestamp":"20241204172000"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__3__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Needs_updates-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z-Needs_updates"],"text":"Needs updates","linkableTitle":"Needs updates"}-->

The list of species needs updates.

It contains only 15 species of Sylvilagus out of 27; Sylvilagus andinus, Sylvilagus apollinaris, Sylvilagus daulensis, Sylvilagus fulvescens, Sylvilagus gabbi, Sylvilagus incitatus, Sylvilagus nicefori, Sylvilagus parentum, Sylvilagus salentus, Sylvilagus sanctaemartae, Sylvilagus surdaster and Sylvilagus tapetillus are lacking. See List of leporids (a featured list) and Cottontail rabbit#Species.

Ochotona gaoligongensis and Ochotona nigrita seem to be conspecific with Ochotona forresti, so these "species" should be removed. Ochotona muliensis seems to be conspecific with Ochotona gloveri, so this species should be removed, too. Ochotona huangensis should be called Ochotona syrinx. Ochotona huanglongensis, Ochotona flatcalvariam, Ochotona sacraria, Ochotona opaca, Ochotona mantchurica and Ochotona coreana are lacking. See List of ochotonids (a featured list) and Pika#Species. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 12:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","author":"NGC 54","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z-Needs_updates","replies":["c-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:22:00.000Z-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","c-Reconrabbit-20241204172000-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Also, some Lepus species should pe moved at Incertae sedis per Hare#Classification. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 12:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-28T12:22:00.000Z","author":"NGC 54","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:22:00.000Z-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The red links on this template are not recognized by both IUCN and ASM, so I propose removing them until such a time as they are recognized... I already made the mistake of creating Northern tapeti and Bogota tapeti which have been split from common tapeti but haven't been recognized by IUCN yet. Reconrabbit 17:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241204172000","author":"Reconrabbit","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Reconrabbit-20241204172000-NGC_54-2022-05-28T12:12:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Recon"}}-->