Template talk:LaRouche movement
Mediation, arbitration, requests for clarification, and other discussions about the LaRouche movement, 2004-2008
|
Long term abuse subpage, LaRouche accounts
|
ArbCom clarification/enforcement, AN/I, 2005-8
|
- Enforcement, Hershelkrustofsky socks, Sep 19, 2008
- Enforcement, MaplePorter, Sep 19, 2007
- Clarification, Nathan/DLTN, July 23, 2007
- Enforcement, Herschelkrustofsky (HK)
- Clarification, Tsunami Butler", Apr 1, 2007
- Clarification, Appeal, Jan 24, 2007
- Clarification, ManEatingDonut, Nov 22, 2006
- Clarification, LaRouche, Oct 23, 2006
- HK probation, Apr 15, 2006
- HK/BirdsOfFire, Mar 31, 2006
- HK blocked, Sep 29, 2005
|
Arbitration 2006
|
|
Arbitration 2005
|
- N_ and others, Nov 2005.
- Cognition's statement, Nov 22, 2005.
- Modification of LaRouche 2, Dec 23, 2005.
- HK indef probation, Dec 23, 2005
- LaRouche 2, Jan 25, 2005–Feb 17, 2005.
- LaRouche 2 talk
- LaRouche 2 evidence
- LaRouche 2 proposed decision
- LaRouche 2 proposed decision talk
|
Arbitration 2004
|
|
Mediation 2006 and 2007
|
|
Mediation 2004
|
|
Article talk 2004-2007
|
- Talk:Lyndon LaRouche
- Lyndon LaRouche 1, Jan 17–Jun 17, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 2, Jun 20–22, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 3, Jun 21–24, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche draft, June 24-25, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 4, Jun 25–July 5, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 5, Jul 05–Aug 1, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche/Jewish, June–Aug 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche HK list, July–Aug 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche HK list archive
- Lyndon LaRouche 6, Aug 6-9, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 7, Aug 11-17, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche omissions, Sep 9-10, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 8, Aug 18–Sep 28, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 9, Sep 18–Oct 11, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 10, Dec 2004–Jan 20, 2005
- Lyndon LaRouche archive, material missing
- Lyndon LaRouche 11, Jan 20–Jul 19, 2005
- Lyndon LaRouche 12, Jul 2005–Nov 12, 2006
- Lyndon LaRouche 13, Nov 2006—Feb 18, 2007
- Lyndon LaRouche 14, Feb 18, 2007 - August 1, 2007
- Lyndon LaRouche 15, August 8, 2007 - November 18, 2007
- Lyndon LaRouche 16, November 20, 2007 -
- Lyndon LaRouche 17
- Lyndon LaRouche 18
|
- Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement
- Political views temp
- Political views 1, Aug 21–Nov 29, 2004
- Political views 2, Dec 2004–Jan 11, 2005
- Political views 3, Jan 2005–Oct 02, 2006
- "Cooked quotes", Jan 22–23, 2005
- Political views mediation, Feb 27–Mar 04, 2006
- Political views 4, Oct 23, 2006–Oct 11, 2007
- Political views 5, Oct 11, 2007–Nov 28, 2007
- Political views 6, Nov 28, 2007–Apr 12, 2008
- Political views 7, Apr 15, 2008–Sep 24, 2008
|
|
Template talk
|
|
Categories
|
|
|
Curious about David P. Goldman, I took a look at his article and noticed the "LaRouche movement" box at the bottom. He's a former member of that group, but left (or was just kicked out), and it seemed unfair to imply, as this template seemed to do, that he's some kind of a current member. That also seems to be a BLP problem. So I looked at the articles for others listed in that "People" section and found a total of four that seem to be no longer part of the LaRouche movement and put them all in the separate section. Listing them in a simple "People" section would be a bit like putting Whittaker Chambers, James Burnham and The God that Failed writers in a "Communist movement" template and placing that at the bottom of each article. It's just misleading. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 04:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
One other thing: I called the new section "People separated from the movement", which isn't very graceful wording. Perhaps "Former members" might be a better title, but I thought some readers might confuse that with deceased members. If someone wants to change it to "Former members" or something else, please feel free. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-14T04:17:00.000Z","author":"JohnWBarber","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JohnWBarber-2010-04-14T04:17:00.000Z-Split_off_section_for_those_separated_from_the_movement","replies":["c-Know_your_cuts_of_meat-2010-04-15T00:25:00.000Z-JohnWBarber-2010-04-14T04:17:00.000Z"]}}-->
- You also have Roy Frankhouser and Jeremiah Duggan who were never members of the group, but got on the template by virtue of being "linked" to it in the press. Actually, Gunnarson fits that description also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Know your cuts of meat (talk • contribs) 00:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-15T00:25:00.000Z","author":"Know your cuts of meat","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Know_your_cuts_of_meat-2010-04-15T00:25:00.000Z-JohnWBarber-2010-04-14T04:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I noticed that J. Gordon Edwards (entomologist and mountaineer) is included on this template. I am not an expert on him or the LaRouche movement, but as best I can tell, his only connection to the movement seems to be publishing a single article in 21st Century Science and Technology. Is this enough to warrant inclusion on this template? Yilloslime TC 00:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-04T00:50:00.000Z","author":"Yilloslime","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yilloslime-2017-03-04T00:50:00.000Z-J_Gordon_Edwards","replies":["c-Yilloslime-2017-03-05T01:33:00.000Z-Yilloslime-2017-03-04T00:50:00.000Z"]}}-->
- OK, it's only been like 24 hrs, but with no comments so far, I'm going to assume that no one cares, and I'm removing Edwards. Yilloslime TC 01:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-05T01:33:00.000Z","author":"Yilloslime","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yilloslime-2017-03-05T01:33:00.000Z-Yilloslime-2017-03-04T00:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Animalparty-2019-03-18T06:03:00.000Z-Yilloslime-2017-03-05T01:33:00.000Z"]}}-->
- Comment: I don't think Edwards was central to the LaRouche movement, and don't necessarily think he should be on this template (shoe-horning people into vague/subjective "related persons" is always problematic IMHO, see discussion regarding "Alt-right") but for the record his connection is deeper than a single article: he published a couple notable pieces "The Lies of Rachel Carson", and "Mosquitoes, DDT, and Human Health" in 21st Century Science and Technology and appears to have been an occasional op-ed contributor and book reviewer for the magazine (e.g. [1] [2]), which also published an obituary of Edwards. So, it's probably fair to say he was loosely in the same circles of environmental skepticism/libertarian-conservative scientists, and is often cited by conservative writers, but arguably not a central figure in the movement. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-18T06:03:00.000Z","author":"Animalparty","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Animalparty-2019-03-18T06:03:00.000Z-Yilloslime-2017-03-05T01:33:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"--Animalparty!"}}-->
|
|