Template talk:Joss Whedon

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Script_doctor\"-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z-\"Script_doctor\""],"text":"\"Script doctor\"","linkableTitle":"\"Script doctor\""}-->

"Script doctor"

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Script_doctor\"-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z-\"Script_doctor\""]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Script_doctor\"-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z-\"Script_doctor\""],"text":"\"Script doctor\"","linkableTitle":"\"Script doctor\""}-->

Is it really wise for this template to include films where Whedon only acted as a script doctor? The Writers Guild of America has decided that Whedon's contributions were insufficient for him to receive credit for Speed, Waterworld, Twister, etc – if we don't respect this, where do we draw the line? I think the current inclusion of uncredited minor revisions takes away from the focus of the navbox – Whedon's creative output. —Flax5 23:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z","author":"Flax5","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Flax5-2013-11-04T23:21:00.000Z-\"Script_doctor\"","replies":[]}}-->