Template talk:Frequency list

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?"],"text":"Why does Template:Frequency list put Academic Word List under Add-ons?","linkableTitle":"Why does Template:Frequency list put Academic Word List under Add-ons?"}-->

Why does Template:Frequency list put Academic Word List under Add-ons?

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?"]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?","timestamp":"2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?"],"text":"Why does Template:Frequency list put Academic Word List under Add-ons?","linkableTitle":"Why does Template:Frequency list put Academic Word List under Add-ons?"}-->

Shouldn't this just be listed under English? It's not an add-on for every language. Plus, "frequency list" does not necessarily mean "absolute frequency."

If it needs to be in a separate section, "Add-ons" is short but otherwise a horrible header for a word list based on frequency in certain areas. "Auxiliary English List" or "Category-specific English List" might be better, but I still think removing the header and placing the link under English would be best.

Sorry all I can do is point this out, but my real-life limitations are getting in the way of doing this myself and I might not make it back here. Thanks in advance if you can work on this! — Geekdiva (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z","author":"Geekdiva","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Geekdiva-2016-01-17T20:58:00.000Z-Why_does_Template:Frequency_list_put_Academic_Word_List_under_Add-ons?","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\"-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\""],"text":"\"Tests\" are not \"Lists\"","linkableTitle":"\"Tests\" are not \"Lists\""}-->

"Tests" are not "Lists"

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\"-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\""]}}-->
__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\"","timestamp":"2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\"-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\""],"text":"\"Tests\" are not \"Lists\"","linkableTitle":"\"Tests\" are not \"Lists\""}-->

A "Test" is not a "List"!
Currently the template has Chinese and Japanese tests, although these seem to have directly associated with them some sorts of word lists. I will revise the wording to reflect a focus on the lists, not the tests.
For the Korean test (TOPIK) there is no evidence of it being directly associated with any list, so I have removed that reference. —DIV (120.17.21.104 (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z","author":"120.17.21.104","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-120.17.21.104-2017-10-08T10:45:00.000Z-\"Tests\"_are_not_\"Lists\"","replies":[]}}-->