Jungle Beat is not a Donkey Kong Country game in any way shape or form as it uses no characters, locations, enemies nothing not a single refrence to these games so I removed it from the Donkey Kong Country section and moved it into other because it didn't belong anywhere else. 58.165.215.242 08:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-10-31T08:08:00.000Z","author":"58.165.215.242","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-58.165.215.242-2007-10-31T08:08:00.000Z-Donkey_Kong_Country_Game","replies":[]}}-->
WP:FU lists the criteria used to determine if the use of a copyrighted work constitutes "fair use" (17 U.S.C. § 107)--
I don't believe there's a case to be made here that use of the logo in this context isn't consistent with fair use. -Locke Cole 05:43, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-10-25T05:43:00.000Z","author":"Locke Cole","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Locke_Cole-2005-10-25T05:43:00.000Z-Fair_Use","replies":["c-Carnildo-2005-10-25T05:53:00.000Z-Locke_Cole-2005-10-25T05:43:00.000Z"]}}-->
Any definition of "Donkey Kong game" that doesn't include the two games actually named "Donkey Kong" is not workable.
Think about this template not as a definition of "this game features Donkey Kong," but as a tool to navigate related games. Someone reading about the original Donkey Kong is very likely to be interested in the two sequels to that game, both DK Jr. and the 1994 Game Boy sequel. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 09:09, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-10-25T09:09:00.000Z","author":"A Man In Black","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A_Man_In_Black-2005-10-25T09:09:00.000Z-Definition_of_a_\"Donkey_Kong\"_game","replies":["c-A_Link_to_the_Past-2005-10-25T12:18:00.000Z-A_Man_In_Black-2005-10-25T09:09:00.000Z"]}}-->
I'd enjoy starting, AMIB. You are arguing that DK, DK Jr., DK3, DK '94 are all Donkey Kong games, but that is only on the basis that they use the Donkey Kong name. In Donkey Kong, '94 and 3, his role in the game is no more different from Bowser's, and DK '94 is a remake of DK. In THAT fact, the exposure argument just doesn't work - DK '94 lessened his exposure in the game greatly, and it essentially became the ideal version of DK. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-11-04T07:13:00.000Z","author":"A Link to the Past","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A_Link_to_the_Past-2005-11-04T07:13:00.000Z-Definition_of_a_\"Donkey_Kong\"_game","replies":["c-Impossible-2008-01-26T23:12:00.000Z-A_Link_to_the_Past-2005-11-04T07:13:00.000Z"]}}-->
There is currently a discussion re: italics in titles at Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style (titles)#Italic_in_templates. Anyone with an interest in this should participate in the discussion there. Thanks! —Locke Cole (talk) (e-mail) 06:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2005-11-26T06:41:00.000Z","author":"Locke Cole","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Locke_Cole-2005-11-26T06:41:00.000Z-Italics_in_titles_discussion","replies":[]}}-->
Wow, seriously consider changing the color scheme of this template. I can see that you're trying to go for the DK-themed color but the contrast between the blue and the brown makes the template's title absolutely impossible to see. Kindly consider a lighter or more discernable color, thanks. Axem Titanium 21:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-27T21:31:00.000Z","author":"Axem Titanium","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Axem_Titanium-2006-09-27T21:31:00.000Z-Color_contrast","replies":["c-A_Man_In_Black-2006-09-27T21:40:00.000Z-Axem_Titanium-2006-09-27T21:31:00.000Z"]}}-->
Technically, it should be refered to as the Rare Series and not the main one, since Rare isn't making DK games any more (Except Didy Kong Racing, But that's a different series) but Nintendo is.-GEM036 (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-02-07T21:56:00.000Z","author":"GEM036","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GEM036-2008-02-07T21:56:00.000Z-Rare_Games","replies":["c-A_Link_to_the_Past-2008-07-29T01:18:00.000Z-GEM036-2008-02-07T21:56:00.000Z"]}}-->
In the spirit of not starting an editing war, I would like to discuss if there is a better way to organize the games than using the console/handheld categories. It seems increasingly illogical to organize them by console/handheld, which was at one point perhaps a sort of useful distinction, but now seems a little arbitrary, even in retrospect. A look at many other series suggests there's not really a guideline on organizing them this way or not, some series do and some don't. It's also worth noting that this has been attempted before, and this template actually had this format for 6 months before being reverted back, so I don't think I'm the first person to propose this nor will I probably be the last. ArmosNights (talk) 21:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220715210200","author":"ArmosNights","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ArmosNights-20220715210200-Console\/handheld_distinction","replies":["c-TheJoebro64-20220716073300-ArmosNights-20220715210200","c-TehRYNOL-20230611162500-ArmosNights-20220715210200"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.12.136.183