This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Pennsylvania This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania

I don't think that Devil's Half Acre belongs in the "unincorporated communities" section of the template. It seems to me like it's just a place of interest. Any objections? --RunnerupNJ 13:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-30T13:20:00.000Z","author":"Runnerupnj","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Runnerupnj-2008-10-30T13:20:00.000Z-Devil's_Half_Acre","replies":["c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T14:00:00.000Z-Runnerupnj-2008-10-30T13:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

I agree - it is not a place anyone lives now, so it is not a community. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-30T14:00:00.000Z","author":"Ruhrfisch","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T14:00:00.000Z-Runnerupnj-2008-10-30T13:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-Nyttend-2008-10-30T18:23:00.000Z-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T14:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

Although it's not so common in Pennsylvania, counties nationwide have ghost towns in their county template. Why remove this one? Nyttend (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-30T18:23:00.000Z","author":"Nyttend","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Nyttend-2008-10-30T18:23:00.000Z-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T14:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T19:53:00.000Z-Nyttend-2008-10-30T18:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

I did not realize this was a common practice in other states - since that is the case I strike my previous comment and am OK with including this, thanks Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-30T19:53:00.000Z","author":"Ruhrfisch","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T19:53:00.000Z-Nyttend-2008-10-30T18:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Nyttend-2008-10-31T00:56:00.000Z-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T19:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

On the other hand, many places include the ghost towns separately: see {{Sanpete County, Utah}} and several other Utah counties for examples. I prefer to keep it simple (i.e. anything that's unincorporated and not a CDP goes in the "unincorporated communities", whether or not it's currently inhabited), but there's plenty of precedent for listing ghost towns separately from populated unincorporated areas. Nyttend (talk) 00:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-31T00:56:00.000Z","author":"Nyttend","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Nyttend-2008-10-31T00:56:00.000Z-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-30T19:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-31T02:11:00.000Z-Nyttend-2008-10-31T00:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

I would also be OK with this. There are many lumber ghost towns in northern Pennsylvania. Masten has an article but is not in the county nav box, for example. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-31T02:11:00.000Z","author":"Ruhrfisch","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-31T02:11:00.000Z-Nyttend-2008-10-31T00:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-Nyttend-2008-10-31T02:23:00.000Z-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-31T02:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm not inclined to leave such situations that way; therefore, I've added a county template to Masten and I've added Masten to the county template. I've put it under Ghost Town for the simple reason that there are no non-CDP unincorporated communities in the county. Nyttend (talk) 02:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-31T02:23:00.000Z","author":"Nyttend","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Nyttend-2008-10-31T02:23:00.000Z-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-31T02:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-31T02:36:00.000Z-Nyttend-2008-10-31T02:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for taking care of that, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-31T02:36:00.000Z","author":"Ruhrfisch","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Ruhrfisch-2008-10-31T02:36:00.000Z-Nyttend-2008-10-31T02:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->