This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Logic This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Associated task forces: /  Logic Skepticism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Psychology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology

"Bias" is a very broad topic indeed. I suggest on way to organise it:

• Of judgment
• Of decision
• Group (e.g. risky shift)
• Political (e.g. of voting systems)
• Scientific (e.g. file drawer effect)
• Statistical

MartinPoulter (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-05-28T12:35:00.000Z","author":"MartinPoulter","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MartinPoulter-2009-05-28T12:35:00.000Z-Proposed_structure","replies":[]}}-->

I just added this template to the article End-of-the-day betting effect, which is a cognitive bias. This leaves me unsure of whether I should include that bias in this template. Is there a standard of importance for what is included, or are we striving to add all biases that have their own article? If I don't hear back from anyone in a couple days, I'll probably just add it. Floating drinion (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-04-23T17:58:00.000Z","author":"Floating drinion","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Floating_drinion-2016-04-23T17:58:00.000Z-What_qualifies_for_inclusion_in_this_template?","replies":[]}}-->