Template talk:Baltimore (virus classification)

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate"],"text":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate","linkableTitle":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate"}-->

Name "Baltimore classification" no longer appropriate

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate","timestamp":"2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate"],"text":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate","linkableTitle":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate"}-->

This template seems to have been expanded beyond just the Baltimore classification (which as I understand it was just the I, II, III, IV, V, etc.) It now includes groupings above and below that level. A new title for the template is probably in order. Thoughts? Suggestions? Zodon (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","author":"Zodon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?"],"text":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?","linkableTitle":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?"}-->

Collapsing - by DNA/RNA/etc. or by Baltimore class?

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?","timestamp":"2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?"],"text":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?","linkableTitle":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?"}-->

The template was fairly large, so I added collapsing.

First I tried it with making the groups DNA, RNA and retroviruses collapsible. e.g. [1]
Then tried collapsing by Baltimore class (I, II, etc.) [2]

They work out about the same screen size. Any thoughts about preferred version? Zodon (talk) 05:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","author":"Zodon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Out_of_date-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date"],"text":"Out of date","linkableTitle":"Out of date"}-->

Out of date

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Out_of_date-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date","timestamp":"2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Out_of_date-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date"],"text":"Out of date","linkableTitle":"Out of date"}-->

This template may be well out of date by now. Editing here to remember to update it later. Bervin61 (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Seems to be out of date again: Pithovirus not mentioned as member of NCLDV (of course fam. Pithoviridae is a proposal only). Paramyxoviridae are now of order ...--Ernsts (talk) 05:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","author":"Bervin61","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Indexing_for_Search_Engines-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines"],"text":"Indexing for Search Engines","linkableTitle":"Indexing for Search Engines"}-->

Indexing for Search Engines

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Indexing_for_Search_Engines-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines","timestamp":"2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Indexing_for_Search_Engines-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines"],"text":"Indexing for Search Engines","linkableTitle":"Indexing for Search Engines"}-->

Is it possible to make this template not to be indexed by Web search engines?

If I use a Web Search Engine (e. g. Startpage) 'every looking for any item mentioned in the template, then any article is presented as a hit that has the template included. Because of this there is a lot of useless hits that avoids finding any hits with real information. I zhink there should be a way as articles in one's user area are not indexed.

Kind regards! --Ernsts (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","author":"Ernsts","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines","replies":[]}}-->