PROFILPELAJAR.COM

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Multitronic-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z-Multitronic"],"text":"Multitronic","linkableTitle":"Multitronic"}-->

Multitronic

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Multitronic-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z-Multitronic"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z-Multitronic","timestamp":"2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Multitronic-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z-Multitronic"],"text":"Multitronic","linkableTitle":"Multitronic"}-->

I don't think Audi's multitronic is significant enough to be listed in the template for transmission types under CVTs, especially when multitronic is not otherwise mentioned in the CVT article. West.Devin 22:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z","author":"West.Devin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-West.Devin-2007-12-02T22:48:00.000Z-Multitronic","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Transmission_types-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z-Transmission_types"],"text":"Transmission types","linkableTitle":"Transmission types"}-->

Transmission types

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Transmission_types-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z-Transmission_types"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Biker_Biker-2009-10-28T15:08:00.000Z-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","timestamp":"2009-10-28T15:08:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__2__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Transmission_types-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z-Transmission_types"],"text":"Transmission types","linkableTitle":"Transmission types"}-->

This template is not about transmission types now, it has tradenames on it, which belongs to some of the main types. I think these should be removed because we cant add all tradenames to it see Category:Automotive technology tradenames. --Typ932 ^T·C 14:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","author":"Typ932","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z-Transmission_types","replies":["c-Biker_Biker-2009-10-28T15:08:00.000Z-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

I fully agree. Tradenames e.g. DSG should be linked/covered from the main article and should not be listed in the template. --Biker Biker (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-10-28T15:08:00.000Z","author":"Biker Biker","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Biker_Biker-2009-10-28T15:08:00.000Z-Typ932-2009-10-28T14:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Manual\/Automatic-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic","c-Davism0703-2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic"],"text":"Manual\/Automatic","linkableTitle":"Manual\/Automatic"}-->

Manual/Automatic

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Manual\/Automatic-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic","c-Davism0703-2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Davism0703-2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic","timestamp":"2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__2__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Manual\/Automatic-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic","c-Davism0703-2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic"],"text":"Manual\/Automatic","linkableTitle":"Manual\/Automatic"}-->

Sections should be divided not by use but by construction. Robotised manual transmission is an automated but manual transmission and is built like a manual with clutch and two shafts. Automatic gearbox has a torque converter and multi-clutches between gears. Dual-clutch gearbox is also an automated manual. It is like two manual gearboxes in one shell. Automation in them is by hydraulics. YBSOne (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z","author":"Ybsone","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ybsone-2019-06-06T21:08:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic","replies":[]}}-->

So, do you think there should be a new Automated (clutch) manual transmission section article? Davism0703 (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z","author":"Davism0703","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Davism0703-2020-02-25T22:44:00.000Z-Manual\/Automatic","replies":[]}}-->