🚨🚨 Join our ongoing cleanup drive for 2024 – all are invited 🚨🚨
Did you know
Articles for deletion
Good article nominees
Good article reassessments
Articles for creation
Cleanup (229) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (509)
First of all, let me congratulate Cast on yet another great contribution to anarchism on wikipedia; there was a clear need for this template. It might be useful to discuss in which articles and in which manner this template ought to be used instead of Template:Anarchism sidebar. I can think of a few potential cases:
In any case, I think it's important we use the two templates consistently. Any thoughts? Skomorokh incite 09:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-21T09:39:00.000Z","author":"Skomorokh","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skomorokh-2008-01-21T09:39:00.000Z-Usage_guideline","replies":["c-Cast-2008-01-21T10:49:00.000Z-Skomorokh-2008-01-21T09:39:00.000Z"]}}-->
It's a big issue, central to syndicalism, communism and social anarchism generally. We should add it, probably under Theory / Practice. Any objections? Chaikney (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-03-05T21:47:00.000Z","author":"Chaikney","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chaikney-2009-03-05T21:47:00.000Z-Propose_adding_Class_struggle","replies":["c-Chaikney-2009-03-10T20:19:00.000Z-Chaikney-2009-03-05T21:47:00.000Z"]}}-->
Would it be a School of thought or a theory & practice? 98.246.62.216 (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-11-14T13:29:00.000Z","author":"98.246.62.216","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-98.246.62.216-2009-11-14T13:29:00.000Z-Adding_Polycentric_law?","replies":["c-Skomorokh-2009-11-14T15:13:00.000Z-98.246.62.216-2009-11-14T13:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
I made the navbar black because it is the color of anarchism. Anyway someone deleted it because it was "undiscussed", so lets discuss it...Mangokeylime (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-07T20:03:00.000Z","author":"Mangokeylime","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mangokeylime-2015-12-07T20:03:00.000Z-Make_the_navbar_black","replies":["c-Frietjes-2015-12-07T22:42:00.000Z-Mangokeylime-2015-12-07T20:03:00.000Z"]}}-->
I though about making bold the 3 original schools of though, wich would include mutualism, what you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogat (talk • contribs) 02:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-04-19T02:45:00.000Z","author":"Ogat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ogat-2018-04-19T02:45:00.000Z-Highighting_the_3_main_schools","replies":[]}}-->
|answered=
|ans=
Change group featuring notable anarchists, in order to include Étienne de La Boétie,
From: GrnBlck (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-21T12:28:00.000Z","author":"GrnBlck","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GrnBlck-2018-11-21T12:28:00.000Z-Semi-protected_edit_request_on_21_November_2018","replies":["c-FlightTime_Public-2018-11-21T12:31:00.000Z-GrnBlck-2018-11-21T12:28:00.000Z"]}}-->
{{edit semi-protected}}
Hi, @Гармонический Мир:, I noticed that you changed an edit that I´ve made on the "organization" section. I made the "Affinity group" as the leading concept for the diferent types of anarchist organization, puting it on the Section name. As far as I understand, the affinity group is the primary concept and motivation that leads anarchists to organize themselves, and THEM they decide HOW they will do this, i.e. wich "organization paradigm" they will follow. As can be seen in the section J of the Anarchist FAQ (and more especifiiicaly here on chapter 3.1 [1])
"To aid in this process of propaganda, agitation, political discussion and development, anarchists organise federations of affinity groups. These take three main forms, "synthesis" federations (see section J.3.2), "Platformist" federations (see section J.3.3while section J.3.4 has criticism of this tendency) and "class struggle" groups (see section J.3.5). All the various types of federation are based on groups of anarchists organising themselves in a libertarian fashion."
So, what you think of using the "Affinity group" as the section name, and them, inside it, we list the different types? Ogat 16:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
This navbox is extremely bloated right now. Navboxes are designed to facilitate navigation between related articles, but most of the articles in this template are only peripherally connected. Worth thinking about ways it can be pared down or split out into more focused/relevant navboxes. (Part of this navbox's problem is its establishment of some kind of canon of major figures/events, when those items should not be listed if they are not considered universally related to anarchism.) czar 23:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-02T23:20:00.000Z","author":"Czar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Czar-2019-02-02T23:20:00.000Z-Bloated","replies":["c-\u0413\u0430\u0440\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439_\u041c\u0438\u0440-2019-02-03T00:58:00.000Z-Czar-2019-02-02T23:20:00.000Z"]}}-->
Why this crypto thing has been included in the template when the article literally puts a ancap template, and has no mention to proper anarchism? JoaquimCebuano (talk) 05:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220730050500","author":"JoaquimCebuano","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JoaquimCebuano-20220730050500-Crypto-'anarchism'","replies":[]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.144.109.54