The second continuum hypothesis, also called Luzin's hypothesis or Luzin's second continuum hypothesis, is the hypothesis that . It is the negation of a weakened form, , of the Continuum Hypothesis (CH). It was discussed by Nikolai Luzin in 1935, although he did not claim to be the first to postulate it.[note 1][2][3]: 157, 171 [4]: §3 [1]: 130–131 The statement may also be called Luzin's hypothesis.[2]
The second continuum hypothesis is independent of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC): its truth is consistent with ZFC since it is true in Cohen's model of ZFC with the negation of the Continuum Hypothesis;[5][6]: 109–110 its falsity is also consistent since it is contradicted by the Continuum Hypothesis, which follows from V=L. It is implied by Martin's Axiom together with the negation of the CH.[2]
Notes
^He didn't know who was the first: "Nous ne chercherons pas à donner le nom de l'auteur qui a conçu le premier la sériuse possibilité d'une telle hypothèse du continu..." [1]: 130
^"Introductory note to 1947 and 1964", Gregory H. Moore, pp. 154-175, in Kurt Gödel: Collected Works: Volume II: Publications 1938-1974,
Kurt Gödel, eds. S. Feferman, John W. Dawson, Jr., Stephen C. Kleene, G. Moore, R. Solovay, and Jean van Heijenoort, eds., New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, ISBN0-19-503972-6.
^"History of the Continuum in the 20th Century", Juris Steprāns, pp. 73-144, in Handbook of the History of Logic: Volume 6: Sets and Extensions in the Twentieth Century, eds. Dov M. Gabbay, Akihiro Kanamori, John Woods, Amsterdam, etc.: Elsevier, 2012, ISBN978-0-444-51621-3.