Scientific consensus

Scientific consensus is the generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time.[1][2]

Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward.

Popular or political debate on subjects that are controversial within the public sphere but not necessarily controversial within the scientific community may invoke scientific consensus: note such topics as evolution,[13][14] climate change,[15] the safety of genetically modified organisms,[16] or the lack of a link between MMR vaccinations and autism.[10]

Change of consensus over time

See also: Sociology of the history of science

There are many philosophical and historical theories as to how scientific consensus changes over time. Because the history of scientific change is extremely complicated, and because there is a tendency to project "winners" and "losers" onto the past in relation to the current scientific consensus, it is very difficult to come up with accurate and rigorous models for scientific change.[17] This is made exceedingly difficult also in part because each of the various branches of science functions in somewhat different ways with different forms of evidence and experimental approaches.[18][19]

Most models of scientific change rely on new data produced by scientific experiment. Karl Popper proposed that since no amount of experiments could ever prove a scientific theory, but a single experiment could disprove one, science should be based on falsification.[20] Whilst this forms a logical theory for science, it is in a sense "timeless" and does not necessarily reflect a view on how science should progress over time.

Among the most influential challengers of this approach was Thomas Kuhn, who argued instead that experimental data always provide some data which cannot fit completely into a theory, and that falsification alone did not result in scientific change or an undermining of scientific consensus. He proposed that scientific consensus worked in the form of "paradigms", which were interconnected theories and underlying assumptions about the nature of the theory itself which connected various researchers in a given field. Kuhn argued that only after the accumulation of many "significant" anomalies would scientific consensus enter a period of "crisis". At this point, new theories would be sought out, and eventually one paradigm would triumph over the old one – a series of paradigm shifts rather than a linear progression towards truth. Kuhn's model also emphasized more clearly the social and personal aspects of theory change, demonstrating through historical examples that scientific consensus was never truly a matter of pure logic or pure facts.[21] However, these periods of 'normal' and 'crisis' science are not mutually exclusive. Research shows that these are different modes of practice, more than different historical periods.[10]

Perception and public opinion

The public substantially underestimates the degree of scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.[22] Studies from 2019 to 2021[23][24][25] found scientific consensus to range from 98.7 to 100%.

Perception of whether a scientific consensus exists on a given issue, and how strong that conception is, has been described as a "gateway belief" upon which other beliefs and then action are based.[26]

Politicization of science

Main article: Politicization of science

In public policy debates, the assertion that there exists a consensus of scientists in a particular field is often used as an argument for the validity of a theory. Similarly arguments for a lack of scientific consensus are often used to support doubt about the theory. [citation needed]

For example, the scientific consensus on the causes of global warming is that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused primarily by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.[27][28][29] The historian of science Naomi Oreskes published an article in Science reporting that a survey of the abstracts of 928 science articles published between 1993 and 2003 showed none which disagreed explicitly with the notion of anthropogenic global warming.[27] In an editorial published in The Washington Post, Oreskes stated that those who opposed these scientific findings are amplifying the normal range of scientific uncertainty about any facts into an appearance that there is a great scientific disagreement, or a lack of scientific consensus.[30] Oreskes's findings were replicated by other methods that require no interpretation.[10]

The theory of evolution through natural selection is also supported by an overwhelming scientific consensus; it is one of the most reliable and empirically tested theories in science.[31][32] Opponents of evolution claim that there is significant dissent on evolution within the scientific community.[33] The wedge strategy, a plan to promote intelligent design, depended greatly on seeding and building on public perceptions of absence of consensus on evolution.[34]

The inherent uncertainty in science, where theories are never proven but can only be disproven (see falsifiability), poses a problem for politicians, policymakers, lawyers, and business professionals. Where scientific or philosophical questions can often languish in uncertainty for decades within their disciplinary settings, policymakers are faced with the problems of making sound decisions based on the currently available data, even if it is likely not a final form of the "truth". The tricky part is discerning what is close enough to "final truth". For example, social action against smoking probably came too long after science was 'pretty consensual'.[10]

Certain domains, such as the approval of certain technologies for public consumption, can have vast and far-reaching political, economic, and human effects should things run awry with the predictions of scientists. However, insofar as there is an expectation that policy in a given field reflect knowable and pertinent data and well-accepted models of the relationships between observable phenomena, there is little good alternative for policy makers than to rely on so much of what may fairly be called 'the scientific consensus' in guiding policy design and implementation, at least in circumstances where the need for policy intervention is compelling. While science cannot supply 'absolute truth' (or even its complement 'absolute error') its utility is bound up with the capacity to guide policy in the direction of increased public good and away from public harm. Seen in this way, the demand that policy rely only on what is proven to be "scientific truth" would be a prescription for policy paralysis and amount in practice to advocacy of acceptance of all of the quantified and unquantified costs and risks associated with policy inaction.[10]

No part of policy formation on the basis of the ostensible scientific consensus precludes persistent review either of the relevant scientific consensus or the tangible results of policy. Indeed, the same reasons that drove reliance upon the consensus drives the continued evaluation of this reliance over time – and adjusting policy as needed.[citation needed]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Ordway, Denise-Marie (2021-11-23). "Covering scientific consensus: What to avoid and how to get it right". The Journalist's Resource. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
  2. ^ "Scientific Consensus". Green Facts. Retrieved October 24, 2016.
  3. ^ Laudan, Larry (1984). Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. London, England, UK: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05267-6.
  4. ^ Ford, Michael (2008). "Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning" (PDF). Science Education. 92 (3): 409. Bibcode:2008SciEd..92..404F. doi:10.1002/sce.20263. Construction of scientific knowledge is first of all public, a collaborative effort among a community of peers working in a particular area. 'Collaborative' may seem a misnomer because individual scientists compete with each other in their debates about new knowledge claims. Yet this sense of collaboration is important: it checks individual scientists from being given authority for new knowledge claims prematurely.
  5. ^ Webster, Gregory D. (2009). "The person-situation interaction is increasingly outpacing the person-situation debate in the scientific literature: A 30-year analysis of publication trends, 1978-2007". Journal of Research in Personality. 43 (2): 278–279. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.030.
  6. ^ Horstmann, K. T., & Ziegler, M. (2016). Situational Perception: Its Theoretical Foundation, Assessment, and Links to Personality. In U. Kumar (Ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Personality Assessment (1st ed., pp. 31–43). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. ("In Personality Assessment, Walter Mischel focused on the instability of personality and claimed that it is nearly impossible to predict behavior with personality (Mischel, 1968, 2009). This led to the person-situation debate, a controversy in psychology that sought to answer the question whether behavior depended more on the subject's personality or the situation (or both) and has received considerable research attention (Webster, 2009).")
  7. ^ Przepiorka, D.; Weisdorf, D.; Martin, P.; Klingemann, H. G.; Beatty, P.; Hows, J.; Thomas, E. D. (June 1995). "1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading". Bone Marrow Transplantation. 15 (6): 825–828. ISSN 0268-3369. PMID 7581076.
  8. ^ Jennette, J. C.; Falk, R. J.; Bacon, P. A.; Basu, N.; Cid, M. C.; Ferrario, F.; Flores-Suarez, L. F.; Gross, W. L.; Guillevin, L.; Hagen, E. C.; Hoffman, G. S.; Jayne, D. R.; Kallenberg, C. G.; Lamprecht, P.; Langford, C. A.; Luqmani, R. A.; Mahr, A. D.; Matteson, E. L.; Merkel, P. A.; Ozen, S.; Pusey, C. D.; Rasmussen, N.; Rees, A. J.; Scott, D. G.; Specks, U.; Stone, J. H.; Takahashi, K.; Watts, R. A. (2013). "2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides". Arthritis and Rheumatism. 65 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1002/art.37715. ISSN 0004-3591. PMID 23045170.
  9. ^ Antzelevitch, Charles; Brugada, Pedro; Borggrefe, Martin; Brugada, Josep; Brugada, Ramon; Corrado, Domenico; Gussak, Ihor; LeMarec, Herve; Nademanee, Koonlawee; Perez Riera, Andres Ricardo; Shimizu, Wataru; Schulze-Bahr, Eric; Tan, Hanno; Wilde, Arthur (8 February 2005). "Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Association". Circulation. 111 (5): 659–670. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000152479.54298.51. ISSN 1524-4539. PMID 15655131.
  10. ^ a b c d e f Shwed Uri; Peter Bearman (December 2010). "The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation". American Sociological Review. 75 (6): 817–40. doi:10.1177/0003122410388488. PMC 3163460. PMID 21886269.
  11. ^ Anderegg, William R. L.; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010-06-07). "Expert credibility in climate change". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (27): 12107–12109. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872.
  12. ^ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Verheggen, Bart; Maibach, Ed W.; Carlton, J. Stuart; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Skuce, Andrew G.; Green, Sarah A.; Nuccitelli, Dana (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. hdl:1983/34949783-dac1-4ce7-ad95-5dc0798930a6. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 470384.
  13. ^ "Statement on the Teaching of Evolution" (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2006-02-16. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
  14. ^ "NSTA Position Statement: The Teaching of Evolution". National Science Teacher Association. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
  15. ^ "Joint Science Academies' Statement" nationalacademies.org
  16. ^ Nicolia, Allesandro; Manzo, Alberto; Veronesi, Fabio; Rosellini, Daniele (2013). "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research". Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 34 (1): 77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595. PMID 24041244. S2CID 9836802.
  17. ^ Pickering, Andrew (1995). The Mangle of Practice. IL: Chicago University Press. ISBN 978-0-226-66802-4.
  18. ^ "Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I". 1992. doi:10.17226/1864. ISBN 978-0-309-04731-9. PMID 25121265. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  19. ^ Kerr, John R.; Wilson, Marc Stewart (2018-07-06). "Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety". PLOS ONE. 13 (7): e0200295. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1300295K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200295. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6034897. PMID 29979762.
  20. ^ Popper, Karl Raimund (1934). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2002 ed.). New York: Routledge Classics. ISBN 978-0-415-27844-7. Originally published in German as Logik der Forschung: zur Erkenntnistheorie der modenen Naturwissenschaft. Schriften zur Wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung. Vienna: Springer. 1935. OCLC 220936200.
  21. ^ Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996 ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ISBN 978-0-226-45808-3.
  22. ^ "Public perceptions on climate change" (PDF). PERITIA Trust EU - The Policy Institute of King's College London. June 2022. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2022.
  23. ^ Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806.
  24. ^ Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z.; Perry, Simon (19 October 2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (11): 114005. Bibcode:2021ERL....16k4005L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. S2CID 239032360.
  25. ^ Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (10): 104030. Bibcode:2021ERL....16j4030M. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774. S2CID 239047650.
  26. ^ "Scientists are from Mars, Laypeople are from Venus: An Evidence-Based Rationale for Communicating the Consensus on Climate". Reports of the National Center for Science Education. 34 (6). November–December 2014. Archived from the original on 2017-02-07. Retrieved 2018-04-12.
  27. ^ a b Oreskes, Naomi (December 2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Science. 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594.
  28. ^ Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 2010. doi:10.17226/12782. ISBN 978-0-309-14588-6.
  29. ^ "Understanding and Responding to Climate Change" (PDF). United States National Academy of Sciences. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 April 2013. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  30. ^ Oreskes, Naomi (December 26, 2004). "Undeniable Global Warming". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 26 December 2004.
  31. ^ National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine (2008). "Science, Evolution, and Creationism". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (1). National Academy Press: 3–4. doi:10.17226/11876. ISBN 978-0-309-10586-6. PMC 2224205. PMID 18178613.
  32. ^ "That this controversy is one largely manufactured by the proponents of creationism and intelligent design may not matter, and as long as the controversy is taught in classes on current affairs, politics, or religion, and not in science classes, neither scientists nor citizens should be concerned." Intelligent Judging – Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom George J. Annas, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 354:2277–81 May 25, 2006
  33. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay. "Evolution as Fact and Theory". Stephen Jay Gould Archive. Archived from the original on 17 March 2019. Retrieved 1 January 2019. in Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1994: 253–62.
  34. ^ "The Wedge Document"[usurped] Discovery Institute, www.antievolution.org 1999.

Read other articles:

Haji Bektash Veli Complex

Cultural Monument in Nevşehir province, Turkey Haji Bektash Veli complexHacı Bektaş Veli külliyesiShown within TurkeyLocationHacıbektaş, Nevşehir Province, TurkeyCoordinates38°56′N 34°33′E / 38.933°N 34.550°E / 38.933; 34.550TypeReligious complexHistoryPeriodsSeljuks of Anatolia Part of a series on Bektashi OrderBektashi Order Historical figures Haji Bektash Veli Nesimi Balım Sultan Gül Baba Bektashi Dedebabate Sali Njazi Ali Riza Dede Kamber Ali Xhafe...

 

 

ذو العين المذيلة

هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (مايو 2021) اضغط هنا للاطلاع على كيفية قراءة التصنيف ذو العين المذيلة   المرتبة التصنيفية جنس  التصنيف العلمي  فوق النطاق  حيويات مملكة عليا  خيطانيات مملكة&#...

 

 

Definisi genosida

Korban genosidaSebelum istilah genosida diciptakan, terdapat banyak istilah dalam bahasa yang berbeda-beda untuk mendeskripsikan genosida. Misalnya dalam bahasa Jerman (Völkermord, berarti pembunuhan suatu kelompok orang) dan bahasa Polandia (ludobójstwo, berarti pembunuhan suatu bangsa).[1] Istilah genosida digunakan pertama kali oleh pengacara Polandia bernama Raphäel Lemkin pada tahun 1944 dalam bukunya yang berjudul Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. Istilah ini berasal dari prefiks...

العلاقات النمساوية الكوستاريكية

العلاقات النمساوية الكوستاريكية النمسا كوستاريكا   النمسا   كوستاريكا تعديل مصدري - تعديل   العلاقات النمساوية الكوستاريكية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين النمسا وكوستاريكا.[1][2][3][4][5] مقارنة بين البلدين هذه مقارنة عامة ومرجعية للدول�...

 

 

Félix Tshisekedi

Félix TshisekediTshisekedi pada tahun 2019 Presiden Republik Demokratik KongoPetahanaMulai menjabat 18 Januari 2019Perdana MenteriBruno Tshibala Sylvestre Ilunga Jean-Michel Sama Lukonde PendahuluJoseph KabilaPenggantiPetahanaKetua Persatuan Demokrasi dan Kemajuan SosialPetahanaMulai menjabat 31 Maret 2018 PendahuluÉtienne TshisekediPenggantiPetahana Informasi pribadiLahirFélix Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo13 Juni 1963 (umur 60)Léopoldville, Congo-Léopoldville (sekarang Kinsh...

 

 

Синелобый амазон

Синелобый амазон Научная классификация Домен:ЭукариотыЦарство:ЖивотныеПодцарство:ЭуметазоиБез ранга:Двусторонне-симметричныеБез ранга:ВторичноротыеТип:ХордовыеПодтип:ПозвоночныеИнфратип:ЧелюстноротыеНадкласс:ЧетвероногиеКлада:АмниотыКлада:ЗавропсидыКласс:Пт�...

Jaspal Bhatti

Jaspal BhattiLahirJaspal Singh Bhatti(1955-03-03)3 Maret 1955Amritsar, Punjab, IndiaMeninggal25 Oktober 2012(2012-10-25) (umur 57)Jalandhar, Punjab, IndiaAlmamaterPunjab Engineering CollegePekerjaan Pemeran Pengarah Produser Televisi Tahun aktif1985–2012Karya terkenal Ulta Pulta Flop Show Full Tension Suami/istriSavita Bhatti ​(m. 1985)​PenghormatanPadma Bhushan (2013)[1] Jaspal Singh Bhatti (3 Maret 1955 – 25 Oktober 2012) ada...

 

 

Western Desert cultural bloc

Aboriginal Australian cultural region in Central Australia Map of Indigenous Australian cultural regions; the Western Desert cultural bloc is marked Desert The Western Desert cultural bloc (also capitalised, abbreviated to WDCB, or just Western Desert) is a cultural region in central Australia covering about 600,000 square kilometres (230,000 sq mi), used to describe a group of linguistically and culturally similar Aboriginal Australian nations. Languages The term Western Desert cul...

 

 

1952 en musique classique

Chronologies Données clés 1949 1950 1951  1952  1953 1954 1955Décennies :1920 1930 1940  1950  1960 1970 1980Siècles :XVIIIe XIXe  XXe  XXIe XXIIeMillénaires :-Ier Ier  IIe  IIIe Chronologies géographiques Afrique Afrique du Sud, Algérie, Angola, Bénin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroun, Cap-Vert, République centrafricaine, Comores, République du Congo, République démocratique du Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Égyp...

54e cérémonie des Grammy Awards

54e cérémonie des Grammy Awards Grammy Award Organisée par la National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences Détails Date 12 février 2012 Lieu Staples Center, Los Angeles (Californie) États-Unis Présentateur LL Cool J. Diffusé sur CBS Site web http://www.grammy.com Chronologie 53e cérémonie des Grammy Awards 55e cérémonie des Grammy Awards modifier  La 54e cérémonie des Grammy Awards s'est déroulée le 12 février 2012 au Staples Center à Los Angeles...

 

 

Jair Pereira (Brazilian footballer)

Brazilian football manager and former player This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous.Find sources: Jair Pereira Brazilian footballer – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2012) ...

 

 

华盛顿州

  关于与「华盛顿州」標題相近或相同的条目页，請見「华盛顿」。   此條目介紹的是美國西北部太平洋沿岸的州。关于与之同名的美国首都所在地，请见「華盛頓哥伦比亚特区」。 此條目需要擴充。 (2007年9月26日)请協助改善这篇條目，更進一步的信息可能會在討論頁或扩充请求中找到。请在擴充條目後將此模板移除。 华盛顿州 美國联邦州State of Washington...

Marko Raguž

Austrian footballer Marko Raguž Raguz with Austria U21 in 2019Personal informationDate of birth (1998-06-10) 10 June 1998 (age 25)Place of birth Grieskirchen, AustriaHeight 1.92 m (6 ft 4 in)Position(s) ForwardTeam informationCurrent team Austria WienNumber 29Youth career2005–2012 UFC Eferding2012–2016 AKA LinzSenior career*Years Team Apps (Gls)2016–2022 LASK Juniors 50 (24)2017–2022 LASK 67 (12)2022– Austria Wien 0 (0)International career‡2015–2016 Austria ...

 

 

Quarry Bay Park

Urban park in Quarry Bay, Hong Kong Quarry Bay Park鰂魚涌公園LocationQuarry Bay, Hong KongOpened17 June 1994; 29 years ago (1994-06-17)Operated byLeisure and Cultural Services DepartmentOpenYear roundPublic transit accessTai Koo stationQuarry Bay stationHong Kong Tramways Arbor in Phase One of Quarry Bay Park. On the left is the Taikoo Shing private residential development, and the Island Eastern Corridor is on the right. A playground inside the park Quarry Bay Par...

 

 

European route E12

Road in trans-European E-road network E12Route informationLength910 km (570 mi)Major junctionsNorth-West endMo i Rana, NorwaySouth-East endHelsinki, Finland LocationCountries Norway Sweden Finland Highway system International E-road network A Class B Class The E12 in Parola, Finland The E12 in Norway European route E12 is a road that is part of the International E-road network. It begins in Mo i Rana, Norway, transverses Sweden and ends in Helsinki, Fin...

Solar power in Hawaii

Overview of solar power in the U.S. state of Hawaii MicroCSP collectors on the Big Island of Hawaii The energy sector in Hawaii has rapidly adopted solar power due to the high costs of electricity, and good solar resources, and has one of the highest per capita rates of solar power in the United States.[1] Hawaii's imported energy costs, mostly for imported petroleum and coal, are three to four times higher[2] than the mainland, so Hawaii has motivation to become one of the hi...

 

 

Доллар Фиджи

Доллар Фиджи[a] англ. Fiji Dollar[b] фр. Dollar des Fidji[b] 5 долларов1 цент Коды и символы Коды ISO 4217 FJD (242) Символы $ • FJ$ Территория обращения Страна-эмитент  Фиджи Производные и параллельные единицы Дробные Цент (1⁄100) Монеты и банкноты в обращении Монеты 5, 10, 20, 50 ...

 

 

John Henry Lorimer

Scottish painter (1856–1936) The Flight of the Swallows by John Henry Lorimer, 1906 The Ordination of Elders in a Scottish Kirk, 1891. National Gallery of Scotland. The Lorimer family grave, Newburn, Fife John Henry Lorimer (12 August 1856 – 4 November 1936) was a Scottish painter who worked on portraits and genre scenes of everyday life. Life Lorimer was born in Edinburgh, the son of James Lorimer, who was Regius Professor of Public Law at Edinburgh University from 1862 to 1890.[1 ...

Kosta Rika pada Olimpiade Musim Panas 2020

Kosta Rika padaOlimpiade Musim Panas 2020Kode IOCCRCKONKomite Olimpiade Kosta RikaSitus webwww.concrc.org (dalam bahasa Spanyol)Penampilan pada Olimpiade Musim Panas 2020 di TokyoPeserta14 dalam 7 cabang olahragaPembawa bendera (pembukaan)Andrea VargasIan Sancho ChinchilaPembawa bendera (penutupan)Noelia VargasMedali 0 0 0 Total 0 Penampilan pada Olimpiade Musim Panas (ringkasan)19361948–1960196419681972197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020 Kosta Rika ber...

 

 

Pentium

artikel ini perlu dirapikan agar memenuhi standar Wikipedia. Tidak ada alasan yang diberikan. Silakan kembangkan artikel ini semampu Anda. Merapikan artikel dapat dilakukan dengan wikifikasi atau membagi artikel ke paragraf-paragraf. Jika sudah dirapikan, silakan hapus templat ini. (Pelajari cara dan kapan saatnya untuk menghapus pesan templat ini) Nama Prosesor Intel Pentium Pembuat Intel Corporation Diperkenalkan 19 Oktober 1992; Dirilis tanggal 22 Maret 1993 Nama kode prosesor P5, 80586, a...