Michael N. Barnett

For other people named Michael Barnett, see Michael Barnett (disambiguation).
Michael N. Barnett
Born
Michael Nathan Barnett

(1960-11-10) November 10, 1960 (age 64)
NationalityAmerican
Occupations

Michael Nathan Barnett (born November 10, 1960) is a professor of international relations at George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs.[1] Known for his Constructivist approach, his scholarship and research has been in the areas of international organizations, international relations theory, and Middle Eastern politics.[2]

In 2010, Barnett was named University Professor of International Affairs and Political Science at George Washington University.[3] He is considered among the most influential IR scholars.[4][5] His study "Power in International Politics" (co-authored with Raymond Duvall) is among the most assigned work in international relations graduate training at American universities.[6]

Career

He received his B.A. from the University of Illinois and his Ph.D. at the University of Minnesota. As he worked towards his undergraduate degree at the University of Illinois he worked as a storm chaser in Illinois and the greater Midwest area.

He has taught at the University of Minnesota, the University of Wisconsin, Macalester College, Wellesley College, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Additionally, he was a visiting scholar at the New School for Social Research and the Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University, and he was a visiting professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. Most recently, Barnett held the Harold Stassen Chair of International Affairs in the Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs and Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota.

His most recent books are "Paternalism beyond Borders," Cambridge University Press, 2016; Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism, Cornell University Press, 2011; Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread, with Thomas G. Weiss, Routledge, 2011; and Sacred Aid: Faith and Humanitarianism, with Janice Stein (eds.) Oxford University Press, 2012. With Emanuel Adler, he reintroduced the concept of security community to international relations.

In Rules for the World (co-authored with Martha Finnemore), Barnett argue that international organizations derive power and autonomy from their rational-legal authority and control of information.[7] International organizations are therefore purposive social agents that can act inconsistently with the intentions of the founders of the organizations (which are often states). In contrast to some realist and liberal theories of international relations, Barnett and Finnemore show that international organizations are not just a reflection of state interests and that they do not necessarily act efficiently. International organizations can develop bureaucratic cultures that result in adverse outcomes (what they call "pathologies"). They list five mechanisms that breed organizational pathologies:[8][9]

  1. Irrationality of rationalization: when an organization sticks to existing rules and procedures regardless of circumstances rather than act in ways most appropriate for the circumstances
  2. Universalism: the application of universal rules and categories may not reflect specific contexts
  3. Normalization of deviance: deviations from existing rules can become normalized and lead to aberrational behaviors
  4. Organizational insulation: when organizations do not get feedback from the environment about their performance and are unable to update their behavior
  5. Cultural contestation: different cultures within an organization may lead to clashes that produce adverse outcomes

He is known for his study "Power in International Politics" (co-authored with Raymond Duvall), which is among the most assigned work in international relations graduate training at American universities.[6] The study presents four forms of power:[10][11]

  1. Compulsory Power: direct control by one actor over another actor
  2. Institutional Power: control exercised by actors indirectly over other actors through diffuse relations of interaction
  3. Structural Power: the constitution of subjects' capacities in direct structural relation to one another
  4. Productive Power: the socially diffuse production of subjectivity (through discursive practices) in systems of meaning and signification

Barnett consistently ranks as one of the top-20 scholars "who has done the most interesting work in international relations in recent years" according to the yearly TRIP surveys.[4][5]

Selected articles

  • Barnett, Michael; Kim, Hunjoon; O'Donnell, Madalene; Sitea, Laura (January–March 2007). "Peacebuilding: What Is in a Name?". Global Governance. 13 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1163/19426720-01301004. JSTOR 27800641. S2CID 143099117.
  • Barnett, Michael; Duvall, Raymond (Winter 2005). "Power in International Politics". International Organization. 59 (1): 39–75. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050010. JSTOR 3877878.
  • Barnett, Michael N.; Finnemore, Martha (Autumn 1999). "The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations". International Organization. 53 (4): 699–732. doi:10.1162/002081899551048.

References

  1. ^ Barnett, Michael L. (2018). Gheciu, Alexandra; Wohlforth, William C (eds.). "Constructivism". The Oxford Handbook of International Security. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198777854.001.0001. ISBN 9780198777854.
  2. ^ "Michael Barnett". home.gwu.edu. Retrieved 2021-05-01.
  3. ^ Mandel, Seth (June 2016). "Jewsplaining". Commentary. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  4. ^ a b Maliniak, Daniel; Oakes, Amy; Peterson, Susan; Tierney, Michael J. (February 2007). "The View from the Ivory Tower: TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in the United States and Canada" (PDF). www.wm.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  5. ^ a b "Department's International Relations Program Acclaimed | Department of Political Science | The George Washington University". politicalscience.columbian.gwu.edu. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  6. ^ a b Colgan, Jeff D. (2016-09-01). "Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training". International Studies Quarterly. 60 (3): 486–498. doi:10.1093/isq/sqv017. ISSN 0020-8833.
  7. ^ Blyth, Mark; Helgadottir, Oddny; Kring, William (2016-03-17). Fioretos, Orfeo; Falleti, Tulia G; Sheingate, Adam (eds.). "Ideas and Historical Institutionalism". The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.001.0001. ISBN 9780199662814. Retrieved 2021-02-28.
  8. ^ Barnett, Michael; Finnemore, Martha (2012). Rules for the World. Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/9780801465161. ISBN 978-0-8014-6516-1.
  9. ^ Ege, Jörn (2020-11-23). "What International Bureaucrats (Really) Want: Administrative Preferences in International Organization Research". Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations. 26 (4): 577–600. doi:10.1163/19426720-02604003. hdl:11475/26277. ISSN 1942-6720.
  10. ^ Barnett, Michael; Duvall, Raymond (2005). "Power in International Politics". International Organization. 59 (1): 39–75. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050010. ISSN 0020-8183. JSTOR 3877878. S2CID 3613655.
  11. ^ Payne, Rodger A.; Samhat, Nayef H. (2012-11-26). "International Organizations and Power". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.454. ISBN 9780190846626. Retrieved 2021-05-01.