This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Machairodus" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Machairodus Temporal range: Late Miocene PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Skeleton on display at the National Natural History Museum of China
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Carnivora
Suborder:	Feliformia
Family:	Felidae
Subfamily:	†Machairodontinae
Tribe:	†Homotherini
Genus:	†Machairodus Kaup, 1833
Type species
†Machairodus aphanistus Kaup, 1832
Other Species
M. alberdiae Ginsburg et al., 1981 M. laskerevi Sotnikova, 1992[1] M. robinsoni Kurtén, 1975 M. horribilis Schlosser, 1903 M. lahayishupup Orcut, 2021

Machairodus (from Greek: μαχαίρα machaíra, 'knife' and Greek: ὀδούς odoús 'tooth')^[2] is a genus of large machairodont or ''saber-toothed cat'' that lived in Africa, Eurasia and North America during the late Miocene. It is the animal from which the subfamily Machairodontinae gets its name. Some species of the genus reached sizes comparable to a tiger, making them apex predators of the ecosystems they inhabited. It is currently usually placed as one of the most primtive members of the tribe Homotherini.

Machairodus was first named in 1832, by German Naturalist Johann Jakob Kaup. Though its remains had been known since 1824, it was believed by Georges Cuvier that the fossils had come from a species of bear, which he called Ursus cultridens (known today as Megantereon) based on composite sample of teeth from different countries, species and geologic ages, leading to what would become a long series of complications. Kaup however, recognized the teeth as those of felids and promptly reclassified the existing specimens as Machairodus, including M. cultridens in it. The name quickly gained acceptance and by the end of the 19th century, many species of felid or related feliform (such as nimravids) were lumped into the genus Machairodus, including but not limited to Sansanosmilus, Megantereon, Paramachairodus, Amphimachairodus, Nimravides, and Homotherium among others. This would eventually turn Machairodus into something of a wastebasket taxon, which would be rectified with the discoveries of more complete skeletons of other machairodonts.^[3]

• Machairodus irtyschensis and Machairodus ischimicus were described in 1936.^[4]
• Machairodus robinsoni was described in 1976.^[5] It was at one point referred to the genus Miomachairodus.^[6]
• Machairodus laskarevi was described in 1978.^[7]
• Machairodus alberdiae was first described in 1981,^[8] and extensively compared and retained as valid in 2019.^[9]
• Machairodus kurteni was described in 1991.^[10] It was later referred to the genus Amphimachairodus.

The fossil species assigned to the genus Machairodus were divided by Turner into two grades of evolutionary development, with M. aphanistus and the North American "Nimravides" catacopis representing the more primitive grade and M. coloradensis and M. giganteus representing the more derived grade.^[11] The characteristics of the more advanced grade include a relative elongation of the forearm and a shortening of the lumbar region of the spine to resemble that in living pantherine cats.^[11] Subsequently, the more derived forms were assigned a new genus, Amphimachairodus, which includes M. coloradensis, M. kurteni, M. kabir and M. giganteus.^[1] In addition, M. catacopsis was reclassified as N. catacopsis.^[12]

Modern scholarship generally classifies Machairodus as one of the most primitive members of the tribe Homotherini (with some authors retaining the name "Machairodontini" for the group^[13]).^[12] Machairodus is thought to be a paraphyletic evolutionary grade that is ancestral to Amphimachairodus (which is in turn ancestral to other homotheriines like Homotherium).^[14]

M. aphanistus from the Mediterranean late Miocene was tiger-like in size^[15] and skeletal proportions, with a mass of 100 kg (220 pounds) to 240 kg (530 pounds). It was similar to the related Nimravides of North America. The skeleton also indicates that this species would have possessed good jumping abilities.^[16]

M. alberdiae was contemporary with M. aphanistus in Cerro de los Batallones fossil deposits and was smaller and more primitive in anatomical features and would not have exceeded 100 kg (220 pounds).^[17]

M. horribilis of China is one of largest known species in the genus, weighing around 405 kg (893 pounds). This is comparable in size to the much later Smilodon populator.^[18] Its skull, measuring upwards of 16 inches (41 cm) in length, is one of the largest known skulls for any machairodont, with only a recently described S. populator skull rivaling it in size, with the latter cat outweighing M. horribilis at 960 lb (440 kg).^[19][20]

The species M. lahayishupup of North America was also quite large; fossil humerus bones measuring 18 in (46 cm) attributed to the species suggest that this cat was far larger than a modern lion, which has a 13 in (33 cm) humerus. It is estimated to have weighed between 241 and 348 kg, with a mean weight of 277 kg; one particularly large specimen was estimated to weigh 410 kg. Until its discovery, no true species representative of the genus Machairodus had been described from North America, as they had been reassigned to other genera, such as Nimravides and Amphimachairodus. Its presence in North America suggests that either there was a widespread population of this genus of cat throughout Africa, Eurasia and North America or simultaneous instances of independent evolution in machairodonts on multiple continents during the Miocene.^[21][22][23]

Overall, the skull of Machairodus was noticeably narrow compared with the skulls of extant pantherine cats, and the orbits were relatively small. The canines were long, thin and flattened from side to side but broad from front to back like the blade of a knife, as in Homotherium. The front and back edges of the canines were serrated when they first grew, but these serrations were worn down in the first few years of the animal's life. However, a skull of M. horribilis was shown to be similar to extant pantherines in some cranial characters, suggesting new evidence for the diversity of killing bites even in the largest saber-toothed carnivorans, offering an additional mechanism for the mosaic evolution leading to functional and morphological diversity in sabertooth cats.^[24]

Machairodus probably hunted as an ambush predator. Its legs were too short to sustain a long chase, so it most likely was a good jumper. Its teeth were rooted to its mouth and were as delicate as those in some related genera, unlike most saber-toothed cats and nimravids of the time, which often had extremely long canines which hung out of their mouths. The fangs of Machairodus, however, were able to more easily fit in its mouth comfortably while being long and effective for hunting.^[25] Studies of Machairodus indicate that the cat relied predominantly on its neck muscles to make the killing bite applied to its victims. The cervical vertebrae show clear adaptations to making vertical motions in the neck and skull. There are also clear adaptations for precise movements, strength, and flexibility in the neck that show compatibility with the canine-shearing bite technique that machairodontine cats are believed to have performed. These adaptations are believed to have also been partial compensation in this primitive machairodont against the high percentage of canine breakages seen in the genus.^[26]

Despite its great size, the largest example of Machairodus, M. horribilis was better equipped to hunt relatively smaller prey than Smilodon, as evidenced by its moderate jaw gape of 70 degrees, similar to the gape of a modern lion.^[19] While M. lahayishupup may have preferred prey that typically weigh 413-1,386.3 kg with the maximum prey size being 1.6 tonnes, although it may not have been a large prey specialist.^[27]

Machairodus aphanistus fossils recovered from Batallones reveal a high percentage of tooth breakages, indicating that unlike later machairodonts, due to a lack of protruding incisors Machairodus often used its sabers to subdue prey in a manner similar to modern cats; this was a more risky strategy that virtually ensured that damage to their saber teeth often occurred.^[28] M. aphanistus fossils from Batallones displaying palaeopathologies also include a calcaneus displaying evidence of either a tumour or osteomyelitis, a third metacarpal displaying signs of osteosclerosis, and a mandible with an abscess in the mandibular body.^[29]

M. aphanistus shows high degree of sexual dimorphism similar to lions and leopards, with males being larger than females, suggesting an increase form of competition between males.^[30] Despite this, the species may have formed coalitions consisting of two to three males and defend large areas, including smaller territories of females, as several individuals have been known to severe injuries that would've otherwise killed solitary felids. However, it’s unknown if this would also apply to other species within the genus.^[31]

Machairodus aphanistus seemed to prefer open woodland habitat, as evidenced by finds at Cerro de los Batallones, which is of Vallesian age. As a top predator at Batallones, it would have hunted large herbivores of the time. Such herbivores would have included horses like Hipparion, the hornless rhinoceros Aceratherium, the giraffes Decennatherium and Birgerbohlinia, the deer Euprox and Lucentia, the antelopes Paleoreas, Tragoportax, Miotragocerus and Dorcatherium, the “gomphotherid” elephantoid Tetralophodon, the porcupine Hystrix, and the suid Microstonyx. Machairodus would have competed for such prey with the Amphicyonid Magericyon, fellow machairodonts Promegantereon and Paramachairodus, bears such as Agriotherium and Indarctos, and the small hyaenid Protictitherium. While Agriotherium and Magericyon would likely have been strongly competitive with Machairodus for food, Promegantereon, Paramachairodus and Protictitherium likely were less potential rivals.^[32] Evidence also exists indicating that Machairodus may have been prone to niche partitioning with Magericyon, possibly living in slightly different habitats, with the machairodont preferring more heavily vegetated habitats while the bear-dog hunted in the more open areas. Dietary preferences may also have played a role in the coexistence between these two large predators at Batallones.^[33]

Machairodus horribilis lived in a multitude of paleoenvironments such as open woodland and open grassland. It shared its environment with forested mammals such as primates, chalicotheres, and the deer Eostyloceros. While in open grassland, it coexisted with Hipparion and giraffids, although the latter was rare.^[34] This species of Machairodus was probably a hunter of Hipparion.^[35] It would have also lived alongside the large pig Kubanochoerus.

M. lahayishupup is found is Hemphillian rocks from Chalk Hills Formation, Rattlesnake Formation, McKay Formation, and Ogallala Formation.^[36] It coexisted with other Miocene animals such as Teleoceras fossiger, Indarctos oregonensis, and Hemiauchenia vera. This species would've would have most likely preyed on the large animals that it lived alongside, which included rhinoceroses, and Hemiauchenia.^[37][38]

• Antón, Mauricio (2013). Sabertooth. Bloomington, Indiana: University of Indiana Press. ISBN 9780253010421.