Using the Northwest Passage shortened the distance between Vancouver and Pori by 1,000 nautical miles compared to the traditional route via the Panama Canal. Fuel savings were approximately US $80,000.[7][9]Nordic Orion was also able to load 15,000 tons more cargo than it could if it had sailed through the Panama Canal, due to the canal's depth limits.[2]
The journey has been described as an opening of a new era on the commercial use of the Arctic.[10][11]
It has also caused criticism from environmental organisations such as the Bellona Foundation.[12]
^
Wendy Stueck (25 September 2013). "Ship crosses Northwest Passage, sails into history". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 10 December 2015. The ship – a 225-metre, ice-strengthened carrier loaded with B.C. coal bound for Finland – became the first bulk carrier to make the voyage, which has lured explorers for more than a century and has long been eyed as a commercial route.
^
Wendy Stueck (19 September 2013). "Danish firm seeks to be first to bring bulk carrier through Northwest Passage". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 10 December 2015. Nordic Bulk Carriers' vessel Nordic Odin (77,000 dwt, built 2015) has become the first panamax bulker to carry iron ore from Baffin Island, Canada to Europe through Arctic sea ice.
^"Historic Sea Route Opens Through Canadian Arctic Waters". Maritime Executive. 25 September 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2015. The North West Passage across the Arctic is shorter than the traditional route through the Panama Canal and thereby has the potential to generate important saving in both time, fuel and CO2 emissions.