Francis Buchanan-Hamilton obtained the Map of Koshanpri from the slave in Ava.[3]: 246 Hamilton didn't research the proper name of "Koshanpri" or the literal meaning "Nine Provinces of Shan", but he pointed out that the Shan territory had been divided into 18 lordships, the slave even alleged that this number had been increased to 22.[3]: 248–249 After that, many scholars have given conflicting lists of "nine Shan states" strove to explain the name.[2]: 189
Some of the scholars don't agree with the literal meaning of "nine Shan states". James George Scott believe "Koshanpye" was transformed from "Kawsampi", it is because Mong Mao and Hsenwi use the name "Kawsampi" as their Buddhistical name, the Burman official didn't admit that a Shan kingdom had any right to a classical name.[2]: 189 But the Shan scholar Sao Saimong opposes this opinion, he states that Koshanpyi is never mistaken for Kawsampi, Burman central court respected Shan states use their own classical name, Koshanpyi is referred to Chinese Shan states.[1]: 42
^ abcJames George Scott (1900). Gazetteer of Upper Burma and the Shan States. Rangoon: Government Printing, Burma.
^ abFrancis Hamilton (1824). "Account of a Map of Koshanpri". Edinburgh Philosophical Journal. X: 246–250.
^Henry Burney (1837). "Some account of the Wars between Burmah and China". The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. VI (1): 121–149.
^ abHenry Yule (1858). A Narrative of the Mission, sent by the Governor-General of India to the Court of Ava in 1855, with Notices of the Country, Government and People. London: Smith, Elder and Co.
^S. F. Hannay (1847). Sketch of the Singphos, Or the Kakhyens of Burmah: The Position of this Tribe as Regards Baumo, and the Inland Trade of the Valley of the Irrawaddy with Yuman and Their Connection with the North-Eastern Frontier of Assam. Calcutta: W. Ridsdale, Military Orphan Press.
^G. E. Harvey (1925). History of Burma: From the Earliest Times to 10 March 1824. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.