James was born in Swansea, and was raised in various places around the world with her family.[7] Her parents had married young, and they did not have more children until she was 8. Her sister, 8 years younger, lives in Swansea and her brother, 13 years younger, is the musician Richard D. James (known as Aphex Twin).[8][9][10] At the age of sixteen she joined the Labour Party and was the first of her family to study at university.[11][12]
Her career started working as a policy lawyer with the London Borough of Camden. She then moved back to Swansea to raise her three children and start work for West Glamorgan County Council as the Assistant County Secretary (Legal Services).
James later worked for the City and County of Swansea Council, where her final post was Assistant Chief Executive (Governance). She left of her own accord at the signing of a contract by the Liberal Democrats which she 'thought' to have wasted "millions of pounds". She went on to join the law practice Clarkslegal LLP, specialising in environmental and constitutional law.[11][13]
Julie James sat on several committees, including the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee, Enterprise and Business Committee and Environment and Sustainability Committee. She has chaired the procurement and common fisheries task and finish groups.[14]
On 5 May 2016, James was re-elected as the Assembly Member for Swansea West by a higher majority than her previous term[4] and was tipped at the time to be a likely candidate for a cabinet position.[17]
Julie James set out the Welsh government’s plans for legislative reform to ensure people’s time without a home is “rare, brief and unrepeated” in 2017.[23]
The plan has been described as 'world leading'.[24] The Welsh Government introduced a White Paper outlining significant reforms to its homelessnesslegislation, with the goal of making homelessness a rare, brief, and non-recurring event. Wales pioneered the creation of a statutory prevention duty, mandating local authorities to help individuals at risk of losing their homes. The new proposals suggest abolishing the ‘priority need’ and ‘intentional homelessness’ tests, extending the period for being ‘threatened with homelessness’ to six months, and imposing new responsibilities on agencies such as the NHS and social services to address homelessness risks. These changes are based on recommendations from an Expert Review Panel organized by Crisis. Despite the need for substantial initial investment, these reforms are anticipated to yield long-term savings. While most recommendations from the Panel have been adopted, some, like the obligations for private landlords and schools, are still under review. A Bill is expected within the current Senedd term, with Wales and Scotland continuing to share insights as both pursue advancements in homelessness prevention.[25]
Craig Yr Hesg Quarry Appeal Controversy
Julie James approved an appeal by Hanson Quarries (now Heidelberg Cement UK) to overturn the decision by Rhondda-Cynon-Taf to deny an extension to Craig yr Hesg Quarry(CHQ) - which was due to cease operations in December 2022.[26]
The appeal was approved due to the recommendations of an inspector who noted the significant national importance of the CHQ aggregate, recognized as one of the highest quality sources of skid-resistant surface aggregate in the UK. The Inspector highlighted the national need for this mineral, which he said weighed heavily in favour of the appeal. Compliance with local and national planning requirements was also a crucial factor. The Rhondda Cynon Taff Local Development Plan and Planning Policy Wales mandated a minimum 10-year landbank of rock aggregate reserves & the Regional Technical Statements for North and South Wales further required a minimum allocation of 9.295 million tonnes of new crushed rock reserves, also supporting the appeal according to the inspector.[27]
Despite considerable local opposition, the Inspector determined that the application must be evaluated based on its planning merits. The Inspector acknowledged some limited harm to local amenity due to operational noise and air quality impacts during construction, but proposed conditions were deemed sufficient to mitigate these impacts to acceptable levels. Additionally, according to the report the development would not cause significant harm to the landscape character, appearance, road safety, or from blasting and vibration.
The report also stated that the development would also enhance biodiversity, improve access to the countryside, and provide Public Rights of Way, adding further justification for allowing the appeal, according to an FOI request made of the Welsh Government.[27] This is likely due to the appeal including the implementation of a comprehensive restoration scheme for the site to "establish amenity grassland, woodland and nature conservation uses".[26]
Local protests began at the site when contractors, acting on behalf of Heidelberg Cement UK began removing trees and erecting fences.[28]
_(cropped).jpg)