In September 2018, Hamkins moved to the University of Oxford to become Professor of Logic in the Faculty of Philosophy and Sir Peter Strawson Fellow in Philosophy in University College, Oxford.[3] In January 2022 he moved to the University of Notre Dame[4] as the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Logic.
Research contributions
Hamkins research work is cited,[5] and he gives talks,[6] including events for the general public.[7][8][9][10] Hamkins was interviewed on his research by Richard Marshall in 2013 for 3:AM Magazine, as part of an ongoing interview series for that magazine of prominent philosophers and public intellectuals,[11] and he is occasionally interviewed by the popular science media about issues in the philosophy of mathematics.[12][13]
Set theory
In set theory, Hamkins has investigated the indestructibility phenomenon of large cardinals, proving that small forcing necessarily ruins the indestructibility of supercompact and other large cardinals[14] and introducing the lottery preparation as a general method of forcing indestructibility.[15] Hamkins introduced the modal logic of forcing and proved with Benedikt Löwe that if ZFC is consistent, then the ZFC-provably valid principles of forcing are exactly those in the modal theory known as S4.2.[16] Hamkins, Linetsky and Reitz proved that every countable model of Gödel-Bernays set theory has a class forcing extension to a pointwise definable model, in which every set and class is definable without parameters.[17] Hamkins and Reitz introduced the ground axiom, which asserts that the set-theoretic universe is not a forcing extension of any inner model by set forcing. Hamkins proved that any two countable models of set theory are comparable by embeddability, and in particular that every countable model of set theory embeds into its own constructible universe.[18]
Philosophy of set theory
In his philosophical work, Hamkins has defended a multiverse perspective of mathematical truth,[19][20] arguing that diverse concepts of set give rise to different set-theoretic universes with different theories of mathematical truth. He argues that the Continuum Hypothesis question, for example, "is settled on the multiverse view by our extensive knowledge about how it behaves in the multiverse, and as a result it can no longer be settled in the manner formerly hoped for." (Hamkins 2012) Elliott Mendelson writes of Hamkins's work on the set-theoretic multiverse that, "the resulting study is an array of new fantastic, and sometimes bewildering, concepts and results that already have yielded a flowering of what amounts to a new branch of set theory. This ground-breaking paper gives us a glimpse of the amazingly fecund developments spearheaded by the author and...others..."[21]
Potentialism
Hamkins has investigated a model-theoretic account of the philosophy of potentialism. In joint work with Øystein Linnebo, he introduced several varieties of set-theoretic potentialism.[22] He gave a similar analysis for potentialist concepts in arithmetic, treating the models of PA under a variety of natural extension concepts, using especially the universal algorithm of W. Hugh Woodin. In further joint work, Hamkins and Woodin provided a set-theoretic generalization of that result. Hamkins mounted a general account of modal model theory in joint work with his Oxford DPhil student Wojciech Aleksander Wołoszyn.[23]
In other computability work, Hamkins and Miasnikov proved that the classical halting problem for Turing machines, although undecidable, is nevertheless decidable on a set of asymptotic probability one, one of several results in generic-case complexity showing that a difficult or unsolvable problem can be easy on average.[25]
Group theory
In group theory, Hamkins proved that every group has a terminating transfinite automorphism tower.[26] With Simon Thomas, he proved that the height of the automorphism tower of a group can be modified by forcing.
Infinite games
Hamkins has investigated several infinitary games, including infinite chess, infinite draughts, infinite Hex, and others. On the topic of infinite chess, Hamkins, Brumleve and Schlicht proved that the mate-in-n problem of infinite chess is decidable.[27] Hamkins and Evans investigated transfinite game values in infinite chess, proving that every countable ordinal arises as the game value of a position in infinite three-dimensional chess.[28] Hamkins and Davide Leonessi proved that every countable ordinal arises as a game value in infinite draughts.[29] They also proved that infinite Hex is a draw.[30]
Juggling theory
As an undergraduate at Caltech in the 1980s, Hamkins made contributions to the mathematical theory of juggling, working with Bruce Tiemann to develop what became known as the siteswap juggling notation.
MathOverflow
Hamkins is the top-rated[31] user by reputation score on MathOverflow.[32][33][34]Gil Kalai describes him as "one of those distinguished mathematicians whose arrays of MO answers in their areas of interest draw coherent deep pictures for these areas that you probably cannot find anywhere else."[35]
^The Span of Infinity, Helix Center roundtable, October 25, 2014. (Hamkins was a panelist.)
^J. D. Hamkins, plenary General Public Lecture, Higher infinity and the Foundations of Mathematics, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division, June, 2014.
^Hamkins, Joel David (2013). "David Linetsky and Jonas Reitz, Pointwise definable models of set theory". The Journal of Symbolic Logic. 78 (1): 139–156. arXiv:1105.4597. doi:10.2178/jsl.7801090. S2CID43689192.
^Hamkins, Joel David; Linnebo, Øystein (2022). "THE MODAL LOGIC OF SET-THEORETIC POTENTIALISM AND THE POTENTIALIST MAXIMALITY PRINCIPLES". The Review of Symbolic Logic. 15 (1): 1–35. arXiv:1708.01644. doi:10.1017/S1755020318000242.
^Hamkins, Joel David; Wołoszyn, Wojciech Aleksander (2022). "Modal model theory". Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 65 (1): 1–37. arXiv:2009.09394. doi:10.1215/00294527-2024-0001.
^Hamkins, Joel David; Miasnikov, Alexei (2006). "The Halting Problem Is Decidable on a Set of Asymptotic Probability One". Notre Dame J. Formal Logic. 47 (4): 515–524. arXiv:math/0504351. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1168352664. S2CID15005164.
^Brumleve, Dan; Hamkins, Joel David; Schlicht, Philipp (2012). "The mate-in-n problem of infinite chess is decidable". In Cooper, S. Barry; Dawar, Anuj; Löwe, Benedikt (eds.). How the World Computes – Turing Centenary Conference and 8th Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2012, Cambridge, United Kingdom, June 18–23, 2012. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 7318. Springer. pp. 78–88. arXiv:1201.5597. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30870-3_9.
^C. D. A. Evans and J. D. Hamkins, "Transfinite game values in infinite chess," Integers, volume 14, Paper Number G2, 36, 2014.
^ Joel David Hamkins and Davide Leonessi. "Transfinite game values in infinite draughts," Integers, volume 22, Paper Number G5, 2022. http://math.colgate.edu/~integers/wg5/wg5.pdf. arXiv:2111.02053
^Joel David Hamkins and Davide Leonessi. "Infinite Hex is a draw," Integers, volume 23, paper G6, http://math.colgate.edu/~integers/xg6/xg6.pdf, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10075843, arXiv:2201.06475.