After the war, Strong joined the law firm of his brother John C. Strong in Buffalo, New York.[3] In 1879, he went into partnership with Henry W. Brendel and continued until 1891 when the firm was mutually dissolved.[7] According to historian Laurence M. Hauptman, "Strong was a prominent lawyer and civic-minded resident of Buffalo."[3] Strong omits any discussion of his law practice in his autobiography, jumping from his return to Buffalo on June 30, 1866—to "resume[] the duties of civic life"—to the fall of 1892 when he "went abroad and lectured through England on the North American Indian," on the same page.[8]
As Strong concluded in his 1893 book,
The Red-men are fast passing away. The beautiful land of their nativity will soon known them no more. It is beyond our power to undo the wrongs inflicted upon them by our ancestors; but we can, and ought to be just—even generous—towards the few who are still with us. Let us hasten to remove from our national escutcheon its one foul blot—the stigma of inhumanity and injustice towards the proud but hapless Indian.[9]
Strong represented the Cayuga people residing in Canada in a claim against New York state for a proportion of treaty annuities, which had not been paid since the 1809.[10] With interest, the Cayuga's claim was valued at $400,000 to $500,000. The state Board of Claims rejected the claim, and Strong's petition for mandamus relief in the courts—which reached the New York Court of Appeals in 1885—was rejected on the grounds that the Canadian Cayugas were not a party to the treaty.[1]
Strong represented the Seneca Nation of Indians in an ejectment suit against Harrison Christy, one of the successors in title to the Phelps and Gorham Purchase, challenging the conveyance in violation of the Nonintercourse Act. The New York Court of Appeals rejected the claim, holding that the federal government had implicitly ratified the conveyances, that the states rather than the federal government had the power to extinguish aboriginal title, that the New York statute of limitations barred the action, and that the Nonintercourse Act did not apply to lands within the territory of a state. The U.S. Supreme Court cited the statute of limitations holding as an adequate and independent state ground and dismissed the writ of error.
Personal life
Strong married Emily K. Strong, and they had three children: Jean D. Strong, Edward Clark Strong, and Stuart Efner Strong.[11]
Strong moved to Los Gatos, California, in January 1896.[12] Strong's 1910 autobiography was published in Los Gatos.
^ abThat Portion of the Cayuga Indians Residing in Can. v. State, 1 N.E. 770 (N.Y. 1885); People ex rel. That Portion of the Cayuga Nation of Indians Residing in Can. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of the Land-Office, 1 N.E. 764 (N.Y. 1885).
^Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy, 162 U.S. 283 (1896).
^ abcdefgLaurence M. Hauptman, Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy: A Background Story, 46 Buffalo L. Rev. 947, 950–51 (1998).
^For contemporary news coverage of the case, see The Canadian Cayugas: Their Claims on the Treasury of New-York State, N.Y. Times, Feb. 6, 1888, at 2; The Cayuga Indians' Claim, N.Y. Times, Apr. 21, 1885, at 1; The Canadian Indians' Annuity, N.Y. Times, Mar. 12, 1885, at 5; The Cayuga Indian Annuities, N.Y. Times, Mar. 9, 1885, at 1; The Cayuga Indians' Claim, N.Y. Times, Aug. 6, 1884, at 5; A Washington Medal, N.Y. Times, May 11, 1884, at 3; The Cayuga Indians' Claim, N.Y. Times, May 5, 1884, at 1; The State Board of Claims: Large Amount of Business Disposed of at Its Buffalo Session, N.Y. Times, Dec. 9, 1883, at 2; A Claim by Canadian Indians: The Cayuga Indians Sue for Payment of an Annuity, N.Y. Times, Dec. 7, 1883, at 5.