The International Philosophy Olympiad was founded through an initiative by Ivan Kolev from Sofia University in Bulgaria.[1] The idea was to help replace the Marxist–Leninist subjects taught in schools throughout Eastern Europe between 1947 and 1990. The first Olympiad was held in 1993 in Smolyan, Bulgaria, with three participating countries: Bulgaria, Romania (led by Elena Florina Otet), and Turkey (led by Nuran Direk). The second edition of the Olympiad, in 1994 in Petrich, Bulgaria, two additional countries joined: Poland (led by Władysław Krajewski) and Germany (led by Gerd Gerhardt).[2] Together with Hungary (led by Katalin Havas) these countries founded the IPO.[3] The IPO received welcome by UNESCO.[4] Since 2001 the International Philosophy Olympiads have been organized under the auspices of International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP) and with the recognition and support of UNESCO.
In 2009 the number of participating countries rose from under 30 to about 40. The IPO 2020 originally scheduled to be held in Lisbon had to be cancelled because of measures against the COVID-19 pandemic. An electronic IPO (e-IPO) is organized by Slovenia.[5]
Regulations
Objectives
According to the regulations, the objectives of the IPO are the following:
to promote philosophical education at the secondary school level and increase the interest of high school pupils in philosophy;
to encourage the development of national, regional, and local contests in philosophy among pre-university students worldwide;
to promote philosophical reflection on science, art, and social life;
to cultivate the capacity for ethical reflection on the problems of the modern world; and,
by encouraging intellectual exchanges and securing opportunities for personal contacts between young people from different countries, to promote the culture of peace.[3]
Administration
The IPO is run by the following bodies: the International Committee, consisting of the delegation leaders having already organized an IPO, the Steering Board, consisting of members from the FISP, UNESCO and the International Committee, the National Organizing Committee, and the International Jury, consisting of all delegation leaders and teachers.[3]
Competition
Students competing in the Olympiad are given four hours to write a philosophical essay on one of four topics given. The topics are provided in the four official languages of the IPO – English, Spanish, French, and German – and the student must choose to write in a language other than his/her own; that is, a native French speaker would not be allowed to write in French.
There are five criteria of evaluation.
Relevance to the topic
Philosophical understanding of the topic
Coherence
Power of argumentation
Originality
Evaluation proceeds in three stages:
International Jury composed of teachers from different delegations form groups of about 4–5 to read certain number of the essays. Each member of a group reads the same 5-6 essays, then compares notes with other members of the same group and gives his mark/score on a scale of 10. Those above average score of 7.0 from being thus read make it to the next level. No teacher is allowed to read the essay of a student from his/her own country.
About four members of the International Jury then individually reads those essays which are according to the criteria below:
Those getting average 7.0 or above in previous stage
Those having a difference in marking by two jury members of more than 3.0 point
Those finally making a new average of 7.0 or above are recommended by the international jury to the steering board with five members from the FISP and the international committee. Each person in this board reads each essay individually. The steering board then decides the medals and honorable mentions to be given. They need not accept the ranking of essays as given by the international jury.[6]
National selection processes
According to the regulations, the selection of the candidates participating for a particular country are chosen through a selection process which should be organized or be under the auspices of a national philosophical organization member of the FISP.[3] The precise structure of the national competition varies from country to country.
Austria
Austria first took part in the IPO in 2005. Since then they have two stages. In the first stage, every bundesland (state) sends the best two or three participants of the Landeswettbewerb to the philosophical akademie. There the second stage takes place and in this Bundeswettbewerb the two best will be sent to the IPO. The first Austrian participant were part of the German delegation in 2004.
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic's philosophical competition for high school students was established by Tomáš Nejeschleba at the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Palacký University in Olomouc in 2011.[7] Since 2012, the competition, called Nebojme se myslet,[8] consists of two stages. In the first stage, students write an essay on one of four topics in Czech. The criteria are the same as in the IPO: relevance to the topic, philosophical understanding of the topic, coherence, power of argumentation, originality. The twenty best essays are qualified for the second stage in which students write a short essay in one of the four official IPO languages. The two best students qualify for the IPO. Since 2014, Jan Čížek from Palacký University has been the main organizer of the Czech philosophical competition. He is also the leader of the Czech delegation at the IPO.
Estonia
In Estonia, the selection process, which was initiated by philosopher Leo Luks, consists of two stages. In the first stage, students write an essay at home in their mother tongue. This means that Russian for the country's Russian minority is also accepted. The national jury (5 members) chooses the 10 best essays for the next stage. In the second round (4 days long), finalists first spend two days together where they participate in different lectures and workshops. After that, the final competition begins, which consists of four different parts:
4-hour essay in foreign language, as it is in IPO (maximum 50 points[9])
Test of informal logic (10 points)
Test of central philosophical notions and theories (10 points)
Oral 1 to 1 debate on philosophical issue (10 points)
The two best students represent the country at the IPO.
The best two or three essays of a class (written in German) are sent to the jury (until December, 6th); the good essays will be honoured by a certificate.
The best 26 essay-writers are invited to Münster for four days in February, where they write again an essay (in English or French) and hear and discuss two philosophy lectures.
The two best essay-writers in Münster represent the country at the IPO in May.
Hungary
The IPO selection procedure in Hungary is closely related to and based on the National Students Competition in philosophy, which is embedded in a wide range of National high-school competitions organized under the auspices of the Ministry of Education. All the competitions (mathematics, etc.) are organized in 3 levels, over January - April. The competitions in philosophy involve 11th and mainly 12th grade students, altogether approx. 300 students nationwide.
The first, school-level round is based on testing knowledge in history of philosophy (thus emphasizing the relevance of the curricula and maturity criteria).
Students with sufficient score are eligible to enter the 2nd round. The second round is about writing an essay, students are free to select one topic out of four. The best papers are selected by a jury of Academics, which consists of Faculty staff members invited by the ME, who will invite the students to the finals, i.e. an oral examination. Hungarian is the only official language all through the national competition levels.
The IPO Selection invites the best 30 students after the 2nd round. Under the supervision of the Hungarian Philosophical Society, a new Jury are being invited who will propose the 4 quotations, and they should evaluate all the papers. Students will take part at the IPO selection where all the IPO rules and regulations are respected: essay-writing, bi-lingual dictionary, timing, evaluation criteria, languages, etc. Usually approx. 15 students take part at the IPO selection and the authors of best 2 papers are proposed to participate at the IPO.
Students receive assistance from their teachers to participate at the competitions, however the Philosophical Youth Camps and the „Philosophical tea-house” movement (inspired by IPO colleagues in Turkey) may also help students to gain and deepen their interest in philosophy.
India
The Indian team does not participate anymore. [10]
The Olympiad was non-funded and thus a totally voluntary effort for both the teachers and students. The selection process, which was organized by Kedar Soni, was in two stages:
Abhinav Philosopher - objective and subjective tasks online to primarily gauge students logical and verbal reasoning. Held around beginning of December by Abhinav Vidyalay. (school which coordinates the process) Top 20% are selected to the next stage.
Indian Philosophy Olympiad - Essay round similar in format to the IPO competition. It is held online around January in a time-bound manner.
The two best from the stage 2 represent the country, provided they can fund themselves. Then the training program is held for a couple of weeks, to orient students to systematic philosophy and argumentation. It runs for about 12 hours a day and students need to be accommodated at the venue. Those clearing stage 1 are also invited in order to prepare them for next IPO.
After the program, until the IPO, students meet 2-3 times weekly for about 3–4 hours in an online lecture room (video + whiteboard) to discuss essay topics and their arguments.
According to Kedar Soni, the IPO's internal politicking has caused him to discontinue organising India's IPO selection.[11]
Norway
In 2005, the first year of Norway participating in the IPO, Thor Steinar Grødal just picked his two best philosophy students at Foss high school, in 2006 he and Olav Birkeland picked one each as Foss High School and Oslo Handelsgymnasium were the only ones in Oslo and possibly in the whole of Norway that offered a philosophy course for high school students. Since 2007 a new subject 'history&philosophy' (5 lessons per week in 2nd and 3rd grade) has been introduced to many high schools in Norway, and the selection process for IPO has been tied up to the Baltic Sea Philosophy Essay Competition. 100 Norwegian students from 14 schools participated in this competition in November 2011. In 2012 there was for the first time a 2nd round in Oslo March 23–24 for the 10 best Norwegian participants. These ten went to IPO Oslo 2012 on the extended quota of the host country.
Switzerland
The selection process was initiated in 2005 by Jonas Pfister, and 2006 was the first year Switzerland participated in the IPO. The selection process is organized by the association SwissPhilO, the president of which is Lara Gafner, a former IPO participant for Switzerland. From 2005 to 2012, the selection process consisted of two stages, a first round and a second round. Since 2013 the selection process consists of three stages. At the first stage, students write an essay at school or at home. Out of these, the authors of the best essays are invited to a second round, a semi-final, where they participate in workshops and write a second essay. Again, the authors of the best essays qualify for the next round, the national final, where the students again participate in workshops and write another essay. A jury of five members selects the two best who will represent the country at the IPO.[12]
United States
The United States participated in IPO competitions four times until 2003. In 2001, the IPO was hosted by the US in Philadelphia. From 2003 until 2011, however, the US did not participate. At the 2009 December conference meeting of the American Philosophical Association (APA), Eastern Division teacher Joseph A. Murphy met with APA executive director, David Schrader, and told him about the curriculum for a course 'A History of Western Philosophy' taught in Spanish for American high school students in their last two years before university. Over the next year, the course was approved by the Curriculum Committee at Dwight-Englewood School (D-E). David Schrader and William McBride had been discussing ways to reanimate the US philosophy community to re-enter the IPO competitions. Adding Spanish as an official IPO language was seen to be a possible key to doing this. Spanish was added to English, French and German on a trial basis before IPO Vienna 2011. In order to participate in IPO Vienna 2011, Murphy chose two of his best philosophy students who also studied Spanish at D-E. Together they formed the 2011 US Delegation with the blessing of APA. Since then, there has been a national competition for high school students called the American Philosophy Olympiad, in which high school students from around the nation submit philosophy essays in either Spanish, French, or German in response to a given prompt. The two top essays are chosen, and those two students represent the United States at the IPO.
Overview of competitions
Each year, the IPO is held in a different city around the world. The table below gives an overview of each competition since the inaugural competition in 1993.[13][14]
Santiago Auat ARG
Stefano Burzo ITA
Margherita Busti ITA
Anna Drozdowicz POL
Florin-Radu Gogianu ROU
Carmen Kautto FIN
Conrad Krausche CHE
Maximilian Huber AUT
Sara Musi ITA
Shapira Shiri ISR
Andras Schuller HUN
Joseph Steinlechner AUT
Daniel Thoms DEU
Peter Ujma HUN
Christian Danielov Vatchkov BGR
Matthias Hoernes AUT
Milena Alexandrova Alexandrova BGR
Filip Taterka POL
Clara Kropivsek SVN
Corina Cristine Lefter ROU
Heidi Meriste EST
Luca Vegetti ITA
Bernát Iváncsics HUN
Christoph Schachenhofer AUT
Nanako Kurioka Japan
Vallari Sawant IND
Adrian Cristian Ardelean ROU
Toth Olivér István HUN
Maria Ciurchea ROU
Antoine Vuille CHE
Yuval David Hananel ISR
Illia Gorbachev RUS
Lukas Paltanavicius LTU
Dalius Petrulionis LTU
Sebastian Köthe DEU
Ignas Rubikas LTU
Anita Ignatova BGR
Anna Smertina EST
Alessio Rocca ITA
Paul Kuuse EST
Tae Heun Kim ROK
Tapani Pulkkinen FIN
Platias Nikolaos GRC
Henning Rognlien NOR
Irina Horodinca ROU
Murel Leuenberger CHE
Chitra Adkar IND
Nikolina Budan CRO
Firat Akova TUR
Karoliina Juulia Pulkkinen FIN[17]
Tibor Backhausz HUN
Franziska Bahl AUT
Miguel de la Riva DEU
Cristina Costina Diamant ROU
Vanessa Gstrein AUT
Milana Kostic SRB
Jwa Seong Lee ROK
Luka Mikec CRO
Dominykas Milašius LTU
Patrick Mokre AUT
Junho Oh CAN
Thierry Schütz CHE
Barbara Šoda CRO
Marie Vestergaard-Thomsen DNK [18]
Esteban van Volcem BEL
Martin Kamenov Iliev BGR
Anton Thorell Steinø DNK
David Therkildsen DNK
Magnus Baunsgaard Kris DNK
Ida Mosegaard DNK
Märt Belkin EST
Neal Graham DEU
Jonathan Krude DEU
Maria Oikonomoy-Makrygianni GRC
Lauris Zvirbulis LVA
Misa Skalskis LTU
Dominika Pankow POL
José Forte PRT
Vraciu Cosmin Petru ROU
Denis Horvat SVN
Léonore Stangherlin CHE
Patrick Côté CHE
Estaban van Volcem BEL
Patric Coté CHE
Dominika Pankow POL [20]
Chan Park ROK
Sophus Svarre Rosendahl DNK
Viviana de Santis ITA
Yuki Kanai JPN
Martin Molan SVN
Marta-Liisa Talvet EST
Rūta Karbauskaitė LTU
Vraciu Cosmin PetruROU [21]
Antonina Jamrozik POL
Ana Paula Bellamy OrozcoGTM
Augustė Saladytė LTU
Konstantin Krasimirov Tumanov BGR
Lara Gafner CHE
Helen Maria RaadnikCHE
Liisi Voll EST
Petar Soldo HRV
Niklas Uhmeier DEU
Fredrik Johnsson CHE
Zsolt Hegyesi HUN
Kyu Bo Shim ROK
Ragna Heyne DEU
Viachaslau Verashchahin BLR
Nadal Abril Lucia Molina ARG
Alžběta Vítková CZE
Audun Rugstad NOR
Deyan Kirilov Madzharski BGR [22]
Anna Morandini AUT
Tathagat Bhatia IND
Sonja Stiebahl DEU
Alexandre Eira POR
Uladzislau Voinich BLR
Ábrahám Horváth HUN
Jan Brändle CHE
Matija Pušnik SVN
Roberta Del Pezzo ITA
Andreea Ioana Aelenei ROU
Matthias Verlinden BEL
Emil Kotzev BGR
Lilja Valtonen FIN
Aistė Grušnytė LTU
Helo Liis Soodla EST
Tomoki Ishikawa JPN
Daan Van Cauwenberge BEL
Ruben Algoet BEL
Pavel Belkevich BLR
Polina Perova RUS
Frederico Cardoso PRT
Roberta Dell Pezzo ITA [23]
Tathagat Bhatia IND
Edoardo Calvello ITA
Reinis Cirpons LVA
Franciszek Cudek POL
Simon Derudder BEL
Danilo Djukanovic MNE
Laura Evers NLD
Martina Fridl SVN
Amanda Häkkinen FIN
Leonie Hong DEU
Matthias Verlinden BEL
Boris Janevski MKD
Lóránt Kiss HUN
Carolien Krekt NLD
Isaias Moser CHE
Baoyi Ni CHN
Antonio Piltcher BRA
Arkadiy Saakyan RUS
Vasilen Vasilev BGR
Ajuna Soerjadi NLD [24]
Monique Murer BRA
Stefan Capmare ROU
Tzu Kit Chan MYS
Iulia Natalia Mitrache ROU
Gaeun KIM ROK
Martin Topić SRB
Meggy Michaud FRA
Tobias Heidenreich DEU
Terachet Rojrachsombat THA
Zhengyu Ging CHN
Maria Sara Fraser SRB
Paulina Kaczyńska POL
Javier Sanz González ESP
Paul Johannes Kalda EST
Thomas Valerio ITA
Valerija Baždar MNE [25]
Berkant Isaev BGR
Đorđije Petrović MNE
Elina Saarikoski FIN
Emanuel Krajnc SVN
Hana Ćatić BIH
Jean-Baptiste Bonneville LUX
Kristina Røstad Rosenvold NOR
Krištof Ocvirk SVN
Marcel Čarman SVN
Marton Vida HUN
Máté Héthelyi HUN
Matevž Rezman Tasič SVN
Paramott Bunnjaweht THA
Sara Novović MNE
Toma Gheorghe Tavares de Melo BRA
Younghoon Seo KOR
Yuto Koba JPN [27]
Ajna Ćuhara BIH
Aleksandra Savova BGR
Alon Loewenstein ISR
Aslak Hellevik NOR
Aurelie Fraichard ISR
Dimitrios Kouvaras GRC
Eirini Livieratou GRC
En Hao Lim SGP
Frederik Albl CZE
Giovanni Maria D’Antonio ITA
Kantanat Pridaphatrakun THA
Karl Abiline EST
Lena Wöß AUT
Muhammad Amir Rafiq M. Rafee MYS
Nitya Rajan CHE
Pongsapak Waiwitlikhit THA
Rick Wierenga NLD
Salomé Pierre FRA
Sara Tadic MNE
Tibet Şahin TUR
Usraat Fahmidah BGD
Yeonwoo Sung KOR
Yuhua Gao CHE [28]
Ana Ribeiro POR
Ana Wakabayashi BRA
Andrei-Nicolae Radu ROM
Andrija Iljukic SER
Carl Scandelius UK
Daniels Danilov LAT
Ellen Roper EST
Efraim Dahlén HUN
Giovanni D'Antonio ITA
Ivaylo Iliev Hristov BUL
Joost Ouweneel NLD
Josef Skolks CZE
Junichiro Ikeda JAP
Manyasiri Chotbun THA
Maria Barroso POR
María Díaz Ussía SPA
Maria-D Gheorghe ROM
Maša Kilibarda MNE
Md Emil Hafiznizam MYS
Mojca Ravnik SLO
Nahye Lee SKO
Noah Rosenbaum SWI
Nuno Espírito Santo POR
Oleksandra Khovrak UKR
Paul Kaspar Nurk EST
Pedro Silva POR
Pir Servan Tutsi TUR
Rita Brauna LAT
Sebastián A-Vargas CRI
Shiraz Medjahed FRA
Viktoria Knoll AUT [29]
^The 28th IPO was originally scheduled to be held from May 21 to 24, 2020.[16]
References
^Moufida Goucha, Philosophie. Une école de la liberté, Paris: UNESCO, 2007, p. 89.
^Ivan Kolev (2016), International Philosophy Olympiad. In: Peters M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore, p. 1159.
Jonas Pfister, "Les Olympiades de philosophie dans l'enseignement" (2009), Diotime. Revue internationale de didactique de la philosophie, 41 (07/2009). Online
Juha Savolainen, Pekka Elo, Satu Honkala, Rebecca Cingi (Hrsg.) (2010), IPO Helsinki Finland 2009, Publications of The Finnish National Commission for UNESCO no 85, 2010.
Moris Polanco (2015), Cómo escribir un ensayo de filosofía: Con especial referencia a la Olimpiada Internacional de Filosofía. Create Space. Independent Publishing Platform.
Ivan Kolev (2016), International Philosophy Olympiad. In: Peters M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore, 1158–1164.
Frank Murphy (2017), "International Philosophy Olympiad: A Writing Challenge for Young Philosophers. With an Appendix: How To Write a Philosophy Essay. A Guide for IPO Contestants", Journal of Didactics of Philosophy, Vol. 1, 2017, 49–66.