The township of Faraday was first settled in 1857, when iron ore deposits were discovered.[2]
Prior to the 1922 discovery of uranium, mica, feldspar, and other minerals were mined on a small scale in the area.[3] Inspired by finds of gold in nearby Eldorado (now Madoc) in 1886–7 and onwards, many people moved to the area hoping to find gold.[4]
The Barker Quarries operated south of Marble Lake sporadically from 1908 into the late 1930s, providing marble for government buildings in Ottawa and Casa Loma and the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto.[5][6][7]
After the Second World War and the invention of atomic energy, global demand for uranium increased, and the Canadian government permitted uranium prospecting.[4]
Arthur H. Shore, an independent prospector, first found uranium at his lot in Faraday township in 1948 or 1949. He founded Faraday Uranium Mines Limited in 1949 but injured himself shortly afterwards.[4] The mine was active from 1957 to 1964 and then reopened as the Madawaksa Mine from 1975 to 1982.[7]
The mines attracted workers to the area, and housing for mine executives was built in Faraday and for workers in nearby Bancroft. The closure of the mines after the global supply of uranium diminished created significant hardship for the area.[4]
The township of Faraday comprises a number of villages and hamlets, including Bow Lake, Faraday, Monck Road, and Paudash.
Demographics
In the 2021 Census of Population conducted by Statistics Canada, Faraday had a population of 1,612 living in 755 of its 1,290 total private dwellings, a change of 15.1% from its 2016 population of 1,401. With a land area of 217.44 km2 (83.95 sq mi), it had a population density of 7.4/km2 (19.2/sq mi) in 2021.[1]
^A.H. Lang, J. W. Griffith, H. R Steacy (1962). Canadian Deposits of Uranium and Thorium(PDF). Yukon University: Geological Survey of Canada - Department of Mines and Technical Surveys. p. 175.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ abcdeReynolds, Nila (1979). Bancroft. A Bonanza of Memories. The Bancroft Centennial Committee. pp. 184–193, 223.