A space admitting an exhaustion by compact sets is called exhaustible by compact sets.[2]
As an example, for the space , the sequence of closed balls forms an exhaustion of the space by compact sets.
There is a weaker condition that drops the requirement that is in the interior of , meaning the space is σ-compact (i.e., a countableunion of compact subsets.)
Construction
If there is an exhaustion by compact sets, the space is necessarily locally compact (if Hausdorff). The converse is also often true. For example, for a locally compact Hausdorff space that is a countable union of compact subsets, we can construct an exhaustion as follows. We write as a union of compact sets . Then inductively choose open sets with compact closures, where . Then is a required exhaustion.
For a locally compact Hausdorff space that is second-countable, a similar argument can be used to construct an exhaustion.
Application
For a Hausdorff space , an exhaustion by compact sets can be used to show the space is paracompact.[3] Indeed, suppose we have an increasing sequence of open subsets such that and each is compact and is contained in . Let be an open cover of . We also let . Then, for each , is an open cover of the compact set and thus admits a finite subcover . Then is a locally finite refinement of
Remark: The proof in fact shows that each open cover admits a countable refinement consisting of open sets with compact closures and each of whose members intersects only finitely many others.[3]
The following type of converse also holds. A paracompact locally compact Hausdorff space with countably many connected components is a countable union of compact sets[4] and thus admits an exhaustion by compact subsets.
Relation to other properties
The following are equivalent for a topological space :[5]
(where weakly locally compact means locally compact in the weak sense that each point has a compact neighborhood).
The hemicompact property is intermediate between exhaustible by compact sets and σ-compact. Every space exhaustible by compact sets is hemicompact[6] and every hemicompact space is σ-compact, but the reverse implications do not hold. For example, the Arens-Fort space and the Appert space are hemicompact, but not exhaustible by compact sets (because not weakly locally compact),[7] and the set of rational numbers with the usual topology is σ-compact, but not hemicompact.[8]
^Wall, Proposition A.2.8. (ii) NB: the proof in the reference looks problematic. It can be fixed by constructing an open cover whose member intersects only finitely many others. (Then we use the fact that a locally finite connected graph is countable.)
Harder, Günter (2011). Lectures on algebraic geometry. 1: Sheaves, cohomology of sheaves, and applications to Riemann surfaces (2nd ed.). ISBN3834818445.