PROFILPELAJAR.COM
Privacy Policy
My Blog
New Profil
Kampus
Prov. Aceh
Prov. Bali
Prov. Bangka Belitung
Prov. Banten
Prov. Bengkulu
Prov. D.I. Yogyakarta
Prov. D.K.I. Jakarta
Prov. Gorontalo
Prov. Jambi
Prov. Jawa Barat
Prov. Jawa Tengah
Prov. Jawa Timur
Prov. Kalimantan Barat
Prov. Kalimantan Selatan
Prov. Kalimantan Tengah
Prov. Kalimantan Timur
Prov. Kalimantan Utara
Prov. Kepulauan Riau
Prov. Lampung
Prov. Maluku
Prov. Maluku Utara
Prov. Nusa Tenggara Barat
Prov. Nusa Tenggara Timur
Prov. Papua
Prov. Papua Barat
Prov. Riau
Prov. Sulawesi Barat
Prov. Sulawesi Selatan
Prov. Sulawesi Tengah
Prov. Sulawesi Tenggara
Prov. Sulawesi Utara
Prov. Sumatera Barat
Prov. Sumatera Selatan
Prov. Sumatera Utara
Partner
Ensiklopedia Dunia
Artikel Digital
Literasi Digital
Jurnal Publikasi
Kumpulan Artikel
Profil Sekolah - Kampus
Dokumen 123
Comparison of multi-model databases
This article
does not
cite
any
sources
.
Please help
improve this article
by
adding citations to reliable sources
. Unsourced material may be challenged and
removed
.
Find sources:
"Comparison of multi-model databases"
–
news
·
newspapers
·
books
·
scholar
·
JSTOR
(
October 2022
)
(
Learn how and when to remove this message
)
Comparison of
multi-model databases
(
database management systems
).
Database
SQL
Document
Graph
Object
License
Transactions
ArangoDB
No
Yes
Yes
No
Business Source License 1.1
Full ACID, pessimistic locking, configurable durability
Azure Cosmos DB
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Proprietary
Full ACID within a partition, multiple consistency models
CrateDB
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Apache 2 License
Eventual consistency
,
Optimistic concurrency control
EnterpriseDB
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Proprietary
Full ACID
MarkLogic
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Proprietary
Full ACID
OrientDB
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Apache 2 License
Full ACID, even distributed
SAP HANA
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Proprietary
Full ACID
Virtuoso
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Proprietary
or
GNU GPL v2
Full ACID
See also
Comparison of structured storage software