This article has problems which may render some text or images unreadable or difficult to read in dark mode. Desktop readers can switch to light mode temporarily using the eyeglasses icon at the top of the page. You can help fix these problems; see the official how-to.
While a deal of bridge is always played following a unique set of rules, its scoring may vary depending on the type of event the deal is played on. There are two main categories of scoring: rubber and duplicate. Rubber scoring, and its popular variant Chicago, are mostly used in social play. Duplicate scoring is focused on tournament competition and has many variations that compare and rank the relative performance of partnerships and teams playing the same deals as their competitors.
Bridge scoring consists of six to eight elements, depending on the variant.
The method of accumulation of contract points toward a "game" varies, too. However, a "game" is always triggered when 100 contract points are reached, a "partial game" or "part-score" refers to 10 to 90 contract points, and once either side reaches a game, both sides' part-scores, while still valid to be counted as part of the final score of the entire match, are reset to 0 for the purpose of the next game or rubber bonus.
This is the list of the scoring elements:
If the contract is made, the score for each such deal consists of:
Contract points, assigned to each odd trick bid and made
Overtrick points, assigned for each trick taken over the contracted number of odd tricks
A slam bonus for a small slam or grand slam contract bid and made
A bonus, colloquially known as 'for insult', is received at the end of any deal in which a doubled or redoubled contract is bid and made
If the contract is defeated, the defenders receive:
A rubber bonus is received at the end of a completed rubber by the side that is first to win two games. A rubber bonus is also awarded for some game and part-game scores at the end of an unfinished rubber
An honor bonus is received by any player at the end of any deal in which the player held particular honor cards. (As there is no skill in scoring for honors, players often agree to play without the honor bonuses.)
In four-deal bridge (Chicago) only:
A partial-game bonus is received at the end of the last deal for any partial game contract bid and made in the last deal
A game bonus is received at the end of each deal for any game-finishing contract bid and made
An honor bonus is received by any player at the end of any deal in which the player held particular honor cards. (As there is no skill in scoring for honors, players often agree to play without the honor bonuses.)
In duplicate bridge only:
A partial-game bonus is received at the end of each deal for any partial game contract bid and made
A game bonus is received at the end of each deal for any game contract bid and made
Contract points
Contract points are awarded for each odd trick bid and made. Their values depend on the suit (or notrump) and whether the contract is doubled or redoubled; they are not affected by vulnerability. Tricks won beyond that necessary to fulfill the contract are referred to as overtricks and their scoring points are accounted for separately because their values are dependent upon declarer's vulnerability.
When declarer makes overtricks, their score value depends upon the contract denomination, declarer's vulnerability and whether or not the contract is undoubled, doubled or redoubled. In an undoubled contract each overtrick earns the same as in contract points (30 for notrump and major suit contracts, 20 for minor suit contracts); values increase significantly when the contract has been doubled or redoubled, especially when vulnerable.
Contract
Overtrick Points Per Trick
Vulnerable
Not Vulnerable
Undoubled in: - Notrump - Major suit - Minor suit
30 30 20
30 30 20
Any doubled
200
100
Any redoubled
400
200
Slam bonus
Bonuses are awarded for all slam contracts bid and made:
a small slam, or successful contract to win 12 of 13 tricks, earns a bonus of 500 points if not vulnerable and 750 points if vulnerable;
a grand slam, or successful contract to win all 13 tricks, earns a bonus of 1000 points if not vulnerable and 1500 points if vulnerable.
Doubled or redoubled bonus
When a doubled or redoubled contract is made, a bonus is awarded to the declaring side. It is colloquially referred to as a bonus for "insult", meaning that the opponents have insulted the pair by suggesting that the declarer will not make the contract.
50 points are awarded for a doubled contract made, and
100 points are awarded for a redoubled contract made.
In scoring notation, a doubled contract is indicated by an 'X" after the contract (e.g. a contract of four hearts doubled is indicated by 4♥ X); a redoubled contract is indicated by "XX" (e.g. 4♥ XX).
Penalty points
When a contract is defeated, penalty points are awarded to the defending side. The value of the penalty depends on the number of undertricks, whether the declaring side is vulnerable or not vulnerable and whether the contract was undoubled, doubled or redoubled.
Number of Undertricks
Points Per Undertrick
Not Vulnerable
Vulnerable
Undoubled
Doubled
Redoubled
Undoubled
Doubled
Redoubled
1st undertrick
50
100
200
100
200
400
2nd and 3rd, each
200
400
300
600
4th and each subsequent
300
600
300
600
Without a double or redouble, every undertrick has a fixed cost of 100 or 50 points. The scores for (re)doubled undertricks are such that after the first vulnerable undertrick, n vulnerable undertricks cost the same as n+1 undertricks when not vulnerable; for example, four undertricks when doubled and not vulnerable cost 800 points (100+200+200+300), the same as three undertricks when doubled and vulnerable (200+300+300).
Rubber bonus
In rubber bridge only, a bonus is awarded at the conclusion of the rubber as follows:
for a completed rubber, the side which wins the rubber, i.e. is first to win two games, receives a rubber bonus:
if the opponents have won no games, i.e. they are not vulnerable, the rubber bonus is 700 points; colloquially known as a 'fast rubber'
if the opponents have won one game, i.e. they are vulnerable, the rubber bonus is 500 points; colloquially known as a 'slow rubber'
for unfinished rubbers:
if but one side has won a game, it scores 300 points, and
if but one side has a part-score, it scores 100 points.
Honor bonus or honors
In rubber bridge only, a bonus is awarded for any one hand holding four or five of the honors, i.e. an ace, king, queen, jack or ten.
100 points are awarded for any one hand holding any four of the five trump suit honors, and
150 points are awarded for any one hand holding all five trump suit honors, or all four aces in a notrump contract.
Honors may be declared and scored at any time after the auction but for strategic reasons it is best to do so at the conclusion of play so as not to give the opponents information about the lay of the cards. Honors may be held by any of the four players, including dummy.
Game or part-game bonus
In duplicate bridge only, game and partial-game bonuses are awarded at the conclusion of each deal as follows:
any partial contract, i.e. one scoring less than 100 contract points, scores a bonus of 50 points, and
any game contract, i.e. one scoring 100 or more points, scores a game bonus of 300 if not vulnerable and 500 if vulnerable.
Game or part-game bonus (Chicago)
In four-deal bridge (Chicago) only, contract points accumulate toward a game like in rubber bridge, but game bonuses are awarded like in duplicate bridge. A separate part-score bonus is available in the fourth deal only, without accumulation.
a partial contract bid and made in the last deal, which is not game-finishing, scores a bonus of 100 points, and
any game contract, i.e. one scoring 100 or more points (possibly in combination of a previously accumulated part-score), scores a game bonus of 300 if not vulnerable and 500 if vulnerable when completed.
Rubber bridge
For additional scoring information for the rubber bridge variant Chicago, see Chicago scoring
The score sheet
Rubber scoring is tallied on a score sheet divided into four parts where each partnership accumulates points either above the line or below the line.
The objective is to win by scoring the most total points in the rubber; the rubber is completed when one side has twice accumulated 100 or more contract points below the line.
Only contract points are recorded below the line; all other points are recorded above the line. Any of the four players may be the recorder, his side being represented in the "We" column and the opponents in the "They" column. In the ensuing examples, South is the recorder (the 'We' on the score sheet).
An example rubber
The following table summarizes the results of a rubber consisting of six deals.
The following panels illustrate the progression of the scoring on the score sheet.
Deal 1
Deal 2
Deal 3
Deal 4
Deal 5
Deal 6
Rubber Bonus
Total
Deal 1: South bids 2NT making 3. Only the contract points (70) are scored below the line; the overtrick points (30) are scored above the line.
Deal 2: West bids and makes 4♥. This scores 120 contract points below the line; since there are no overtricks, no points are scored above the line. The accumulation of 100 or more points below the line constitutes the end of the first game and is signified by the drawing of a horizontal line. Since no part-game or game bonus is awarded in rubber bridge, East-West do not receive an additional game bonus and North-South do not receive any part-game bonus. Furthermore, the part score of 70 by North-South is no longer available for accumulation towards a game by them; the 70 points are said to be "cut off" as signified by the drawing of the horizontal line. Having won a game, East-West are vulnerable for all subsequent deals of the rubber meaning that they are now eligible for a larger rubber bonus if they win a second game before their opponents win one and they are susceptible to increased penalties if they are defeated in a contract.
Deal 3: West bids 5♣ and goes down 2, vulnerable, undoubled. This scores 200 penalty points for North-South above the line.
Deal 4: South bids 4♠ doubled, not vulnerable and makes 5. North-South score 240 contract tricks below the line, 100 overtrick points above the line and 50 points for 'insult' above the line. Accumulating 100 or more points below the line constitutes the end of the second game, signified by the drawing of a horizontal line. Having won a game, North-South are now also vulnerable for all subsequent deals of the rubber.
Deal 5: North bids 3♣ and makes 4 scoring 60 contract points below the line and 20 overtrick points above the line.
Deal 6: East bids and makes 6♦ - a small slam holding all five top honors. This scores a game of 120 contract points and earns a slam bonus of 750 points above the line (East-West being vulnerable). 150 honor points are scored above the line for holding all five honors. Having again accumulated 100 or more points below the line, East-West win a second game; a horizontal line is drawn to end the rubber.
Rubber Bonus: At the conclusion of the rubber, a rubber bonus is awarded. In this case, East-West have won a slow rubber and receive a 500-point rubber bonus above the line.
Total: The scores for each side are totalled and East-West (the 'They' on the score sheet) win the rubber.
Duplicate bridge
Scoring in duplicate bridge is done in two stages:
Each deal is scored as in rubber bridge but with some variations in methodology.
The result of each deal by each partnership is compared to all other results for the same deal by all other partnerships.
Scoring deals
In duplicate scoring, the score for each deal is independent from all others and is a single number resulting from the addition of points awarded in accordance with either of two cases:
when the contract is successful, the declaring side receives a positive score which is the sum of the following elements, if applicable: (i) contract points, (ii) overtrick points, (iii) a part-game or game bonus, (iv) a bonus for making any doubled or redoubled contract, i.e. for 'insult', and (v) a slam or grand slam bonus; the defending side receives a negative score of the same absolute value.
when the contract is defeated, the defending side receives a positive score based upon the number of tricks defeated, declarer's vulnerability, and whether undoubled, doubled or redoubled; the declaring side receives a negative score of the same absolute value.
Example results for a sixteen board match
In duplicate bridge, the dealer and the status of vulnerability for each side is predetermined by the board, there being sixteen possible combinations.
Board
Dealer
Vulnerability
Declarer
Contract
Made
Down
Contract Points
Overtrick Points
Slam Bonus
(Re)doubled Bonus
Penalty Points
Game Points
Total N-S
Total E-W
1
N
None
E
1♥
3
30
2×30=60
50
−140
140
2
E
N-S
N
4♠X
2
(1×200)+(1×300)=500
−500
500
3
S
E-W
N
2♦
4
2×20=40
2×20=40
50
130
−130
4
W
Both
W
1NT
3
40
2×30=60
50
−150
150
5
N
N-S
S
3NT
1
100
−100
100
6
E
E-W
S
3♥
4
3×30=90
30
50
170
−170
7
S
Both
W
3♣
3
3×20=60
50
−110
110
8
W
None
E
7♥
7
7×30=210
1000
300
−1510
1510
9
N
E-W
N
4♠X
4
2×(4×30)=240
50
300
590
−590
10
E
Both
E
2NT
2
40+30=70
50
−120
120
11
S
None
N
6♣
6
6×20=120
500
300
920
−920
12
W
N-S
E
2♦
3
2×20=40
20
50
−110
110
13
N
Both
W
4♥XX
4
2×2×(4×30)=480
100
500
−1080
1080
14
E
None
S
5♠
1
50
−50
50
15
S
N-S
E
4♥
5
4×30=120
30
300
−450
450
16
W
E-W
N
3NT
3
40+(2×30)=100
300
400
−400
Comparing deals
Matchpoint scoring
One common form of pairs scoring is by matchpoints. On each board, a partnership scores two matchpoints for each other partnership that scored fewer points with the same cards, and one point for each other partnership that scored the same number of points. Thus, every board is weighted equally, with the best result earning 100 percent of the matchpoints available, and the worst earning no matchpoints; the opponents receive the complement score, e.g. an 80% score for a N–S pair implies a 20% score for their E–W opponents. Colloquially, a maximum matchpoints score on a board is known as a "top", and a zero score is a "bottom". The terms "high board" and "low board" are also used.
Note 1: Using American Contract Bridge League (ACBL) methods, scoring is one point for each pair beaten, and one-half point for each pair tied.
Note 2: The rule of two matchpoints for each pair beaten is easy to apply in practice: if the board is played n times, the top result achieves 2n−2 matchpoints, the next 2n−4, down to zero. When there are several identical results, they receive the average. However, complications occur if not every board is played the same number of times, or when an "adjusted" (director-awarded) score occurs. These cases can result in non-integer matchpoint scores – see Neuberg formula.
These matchpoints are added across all the hands that a pair plays to determine the winner. Scores are usually given as percentages of a theoretical maximum: 100% would mean that the partnership achieved the best score on every single hand. In practice, a result of 60% or 65% is likely to win the tournament or come close. In a Mitchell movement (see above) the overall scores are usually compared separately for North–South pairs and for East–West pairs, so that there is one winner in each group (unless arrow-switching has been applied - see above).
In board-a-match team game, the matchpoints are calculated using a similar principle. Since there are only two teams involved, the only possible results are 1 (won), ½ (tied), and 0 (lost) points per board.[1]
International Match Point scoring
In International Match Point (IMP) scoring,[a] the difference in total points scored (or "swing") is converted to IMPs using the standard IMP table below.[2][3] The purpose of the IMP table, which has sublinear dependency on differences, is to reduce results occurring from large swings.[4]
IMP table
Point difference
IMPs
Point difference
IMPs
Point difference
IMPs
from
to
from
to
from
to
0
10
0
370
420
9
1500
1740
17
20
40
1
430
490
10
1750
1990
18
50
80
2
500
590
11
2000
2240
19
90
120
3
600
740
12
2250
2490
20
130
160
4
750
890
13
2500
2990
21
170
210
5
900
1090
14
3000
3490
22
220
260
6
1100
1290
15
3500
3990
23
270
310
7
1300
1490
16
4000 or more
24
320
360
8
The score that is being compared against can be obtained in the following ways:
In team events, it is the score from the teammates' table
In pair events, it can be:
The datum score, most often calculated as the average score on board, excluding a number of top and bottom results. Sometimes, the median score is used instead.
In "cross-IMP" or "Calcutta" scoring, every score on board is compared against every other score (sometimes excluding top and bottom results) and IMPs summed up (and possibly averaged, to reduce "inflation").
Example of averaged cross-IMP scoring:
Pair Making 4♠ for +620
Scores of the four other North/South pairs
−100
−100
−300
+650
Point difference
720
720
920
−30
IMPs gained
12
12
14
−1
Total IMPs gained
37
Number of competitors
4
Average cross-IMP score
9.25
Five North/South pairs play a board when vulnerable against non-vulnerable opponents. One pair makes a 4♠ contract, scoring +620, while the other North/South pairs score −100, −100, −300, and +650, respectively.
To determine the average cross-IMP score for the pair making 4♠, the table at right is created, entering the contract points scored by each pair.
Each of the other North/South's scores are subtracted from the +620 score and the result entered in the point-differential cells. For each point differential, the IMP look-up table is used to determine the IMPs gained. For example, the differential of 720 equates to 12 IMPs, because it falls in the range of 600 to 740 in the IMP table. Adding the IMPs gained gives a total of 37. To determine the average IMPs gained, divide the total by the number of competitors (37 divided by 4) to arrive at 9.25 as the averaged cross-IMP score.
Victory Point scoring
In some events (for example, Swiss Teams), a further normalization to reduce the effect of large swings is applied to the International Match Point scores.
A specific number of Victory Points, either 20 or 30, are divided between the two teams in accordance with the following scales:
20-point scale
IMP Score
0
1-2
3-4
5-7
8-10
11-13
14-16
17-19
20-23
24-27
28+
VPs
10-10
11-9
12-8
13-7
14-6
15-5
16-4
17-3
18-2
19-1
20-0
Example: A team winning by 12 IMPs would receive 15 VPs and their opponents 5.
30-point scale
IMP Score
0
1
2
3
4
5-6
7-8
9-10
11-13
14-16
17-19
20-23
24-27
28+
VPs
15-15
18-12
19-11
20-10
21-9
22-8
23-7
24-6
25-5
26-4
27-3
28-2
29-1
30-0
Example: A team winning by 12 IMPs would receive 25 VPs and their opponents 5.
History of contract bridge scoring
Scoring of tricks in notrump contracts
In the 1932 Laws of Contract Bridge, notrump tricks bid and made, and undoubled notrump tricks made but not bid, score 30, 40, 30, 40, 30, 40, 30.[5]: law 30
In 1935 this became 40, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30.[6]: law 39
Redoubled undertricks have always scored twice as much as the same doubled undertricks.
After 1987
A change to the scoring of the fourth and subsequent non-vulnerable undertricks, from 200 each to 300 each, was made in 1987 after a hand in the finals of the 1981 Bermuda Bowl. Munir Attaullah and Jan-e-Alam Fazli, playing for Pakistan, reached a vulnerable 7♥ contract, which would have scored them 2210. But their non-vulnerable opponent Jeff Meckstroth, playing for USA, calculated that down 11 would cost only 2100 points and thinking he might do better than that,[8] sacrificed in 7♠ on a weak hand with five spades to the jack; this was doubled and went down nine for a score of -1700. The 510 point differential resulted in an 11 IMP swing in his team's favor.
The 1987 change in scoring increased the penalty for down nine when doubled and not vulnerable from -1700 to -2300.[9]
Condition
After 1987 for duplicate bridge[10]: law 77 and after 1993 for rubber bridge
Not vulnerable, not doubled
50 each
Not vulnerable, doubled
100, 200, 200, 300, 300, 300etc.
Vulnerable, not doubled
100 each
Vulnerable, doubled
200, 300, 300, 300, 300, 300 etc.
Also, the "insult bonus" in rubber bridge for making a redoubled contract used to be only 50. This was changed to 100, so that playing 5 of a minor, redoubled, making an overtrick, is always worth more than an undoubled small slam.
8-level bids
It has always been the intention of every official set of Laws of Contract Bridge to forbid contracts for more than thirteen tricks. Some versions have stated this more clearly than others, but this intention of the Laws has never changed.
International Match Points
International Match Point scoring was first introduced at the 1938 European Championships in Oslo.[11] Its purpose is to moderate the disproportionate effect that a very large score differential (or "swing') on just one or two boards could have on the outcome of a contest involving dozens of boards.[11] The difference in total points scored by each team is converted to International Match Points (IMPs) using a standard table[2][12] which has sublinear dependencies on differences to reduce the effect of such large swings.[4]
Originally named European Match Points (EMPs),[b] the scale provided for a maximum gain of 12 points as shown in the table below. A revised table was adopted for the 1948 European Championships in Copenhagen with a maximum of 15 points. North American players were first introduced to this scoring method at the 1951 Bermuda Bowl match in Naples, Italy.[4][11]
Jennifer RingleyLahirJennifer Kaye Ringley10 Agustus 1976 (umur 47)Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, A.S.Tahun aktif1996–2003Dikenal atasJenniCamLifecastingSitus webhttp://replay.web.archive.org/*/http://www.jennicam.org/ Jennifer Kaye Ringley (lahir 10 Agustus 1976[1]) adalah selebriti internet dan mantan lifecaster. Dia dikenal karena menciptakan situs web populer JenniCam.[2] Sebelumnya, Webcam langsung direkam dari kamera yang ditujukan ke jendela atau di pot kopi. In...
Pour les articles homonymes, voir Suzhou (homonymie). Suzhou 苏州市 Administration Pays Chine Province ou région autonome Jiangsu Statut administratif Ville-préfecture Secrétaire du PCC Zhou Naixiang (en) (depuis janvier 2016) Code postal Ville : 215000[1] Code aéroport SZV Indicatif +86 (0)0512[1] Immatriculation 苏E Démographie 12 748 262 hab. (2018) Densité 7 728 hab./km2 Population de l'agglomération 4 330 000 hab. Géographie Coord...
Association football club in England Football clubHythe & DibdenFull nameHythe & Dibden Football ClubFounded1902GroundClayfields, HytheManagerTerry CoxLeagueWessex League Premier Division2022–23Wessex League Premier Division, 12th of 20 Home colours Away colours Hythe & Dibden Football Club is a football club based in Hythe, near Southampton in Hampshire. They are currently members of the Wessex League Premier Division and play at Clayfields. History The club was established in ...
Canadian professional wrestler Ivan KoloffKoloff, c. 1982Birth nameOreal Donald Perras[1]Born(1942-08-25)August 25, 1942[2][1]Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDiedFebruary 18, 2017(2017-02-18) (aged 74)Winterville, North Carolina, U.S.[1]Cause of deathLiver cancerProfessional wrestling careerRing name(s)Ivan Koloff[2][1]Jim Parris[3]Orwell ParisRed McNulty[2]Billed height5 ft 9 in (175 cm)[4][5]Bi...
Brazilian footballer (1930–2020) Cabeção Personal informationFull name Luís MoraisDate of birth (1930-08-23)23 August 1930Place of birth São Paulo, BrazilDate of death 6 January 2020(2020-01-06) (aged 89)Position(s) GoalkeeperSenior career*Years Team Apps (Gls)1949–1954 Corinthians 1954–1955 Bangu 1955–1957 Portuguesa 1957–1960 Corinthians International career1954 Brazil *Club domestic league appearances and goals Luís Morais (23 August 1930 – 6 January 2020), also known...
Genus of birds Ground jays Turkestan ground jay Scientific classification Domain: Eukaryota Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Aves Order: Passeriformes Family: Corvidae Genus: PodocesFischer von Waldheim, 1821 Type species Podoces panderi[1]Fischer von Waldheim, 1821 Species Podoces hendersoni Podoces biddulphi Podoces pleskei Podoces panderi The ground jays or ground choughs belong to a distinct group of the passerine order of birds in the genus Podoces of the crow family Cor...
Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento economia non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti. Commento: se capisco bene, le fonti parlano della teoria classica a cui questa economia cognitiva si contrapporrebbe Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. L'economia cognitiva è una nuova branca dell'economia, che si è sviluppata in ambito accademi...
German botanist (1848-1931) Urb. redirects here. For other uses, see Urb. Ignatz UrbanIgnatz Urban in 1881BornJanuary 7, 1848Warburg, Kingdom of PrussiaDiedJanuary 7, 1931 (aged 83)Berlin, Weimar RepublicAlma materUniversity of Bonn, University of BerlinScientific careerAuthor abbrev. (botany)Urb. Ignatz Urban (7 January 1848 – 7 January 1931) was a German botanist. He is known for his contributions to the flora of the Caribbean and Brazil, and for his work as curator of the Berli...
هذه المقالة بحاجة لصندوق معلومات. فضلًا ساعد في تحسين هذه المقالة بإضافة صندوق معلومات مخصص إليها. هذه مقالة غير مراجعة. ينبغي أن يزال هذا القالب بعد أن يراجعها محرر؛ إذا لزم الأمر فيجب أن توسم المقالة بقوالب الصيانة المناسبة. يمكن أيضاً تقديم طلب لمراجعة المقالة في الصفحة ...
يفتقر محتوى هذه المقالة إلى الاستشهاد بمصادر. فضلاً، ساهم في تطوير هذه المقالة من خلال إضافة مصادر موثوق بها. أي معلومات غير موثقة يمكن التشكيك بها وإزالتها. (يناير 2022) اختبار نسبة تحميل كاليفورنيا (بالإنجليزية: California bearing ratio) واختصاراً CBR هو تجربة مخبرية لقياس الضغط اللاز�...
هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (أغسطس 2020) الدببة بيرنستينمعلومات عامةالمؤلف Stan and Jan Berenstain (en) — Mike Berenstain (en) البلد الولايات المتحدة تاريخ الإصدار 1962[1] تعديل - تعديل مصدري - تعديل ويكي بيانات الد...
UFC mixed martial arts event in 2008 UFC 84: Ill WillThe poster for UFC 84: Ill WillInformationPromotionUltimate Fighting ChampionshipDateMay 24, 2008VenueMGM Grand Garden ArenaCityParadise, NevadaAttendance14,773 (13,448 paid)[1]Total gate$3,732,000[1]Buyrate475,000Event chronology UFC 83: Serra vs St-Pierre 2 UFC 84: Ill Will UFC 85: Bedlam UFC 84: Ill Will was a mixed martial arts event held by the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) on May 24, 2008, at the MGM Grand Garde...
5th European Aquatics ChampionshipsHost cityLondonCountryUnited KingdomEvents16Opening6 August 1938 (1938-08-06)Closing13 August 1938 (1938-08-13)← Madenburg 1934Monte Carlo 1947 → Empire Pool Wembley on the first day of the 1938 European Aquatics Championships. London, 6 August 1938. The 1938 LEN European Aquatics Championships were held 6–13 August 1938 in London, United Kingdom. Medal table * Host nation (G...
Israeli research satellite BGUSATBGUSAT satellite mission patchMission typeEarth observationTechnologyOperatorISA/Ben-Gurion University of the NegevCOSPAR ID2017-008BD SATCAT no.41999Websitewwwee.ee.bgu.ac.il/~bgusat/menu_bar.htmMission duration6 years and 9 days Spacecraft propertiesManufacturerIAI Ben-Gurion University of the NegevLaunch mass5 kilograms (11 lb) [1]Dimensions30 x 10 x 10 cm (3U cubesat) Start of missionLaunch date15 February 2017, 03:58 UTC[2]R...
1925 film Dr. Pyckle and Mr. PrydeLobby cardDirected byScott PembrokeJoe RockWritten byTay GarnettProduced byJoe RockStarringStan LaurelCinematographyEdgar LyonsProductioncompanyStandard Photoplay CompanyDistributed bySelznick Distributing Corp.Release date July 30, 1925 (1925-07-30) Running time21 minutesCountryUnited StatesLanguageSilent (English intertitles) Dr. Pyckle and Mr. Pryde (or Dr. Pyckle and Mr. Pride) is a 1925 American silent, black-and-white comedy horror film, ...
Sekretariat Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik IndonesiaGambaran umumDasar hukumPeraturan Presiden Nomor 59 Tahun 2015Susunan organisasiSekretarisPribudiarta Nur Sitepu[1]Kantor pusatJalan Medan Merdeka Barat No. 15, Jakarta 10110Situs webwww.kemenpppa.go.id Sekretariat Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia merupakan unsur pembantu pimpinan pada Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik I...
King of Bavaria from 1913 to 1918 Ludwig III redirects here. For the Grand Duke of Hesse, see Louis III, Grand Duke of Hesse. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Ludwig III of Bavaria – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) Ludwig...
Christian monk, theologian, scholar and saint (c. 580 - 662) SaintMaximus the ConfessorIcon of St. MaximusConfessor and TheologianBornc. 580Hisfiyya, Syria Prima, Byzantine Empire[1]orConstantinople, Byzantine EmpireDied(662-08-13)13 August 662TsageriVenerated inCatholic ChurchEastern Orthodox ChurchAnglican CommunionLutheranismCanonizedPre-CongregationFeast13 August (Western Christianity) 21 January (Byzantine Christianity)Theology careerNotable workMystagogyTheological w...