An Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO, also known as a Concurrency Regulation) is an American legislative method to tie public infrastructure to growth for a region.[1]
APFOs take into account the availability of infrastructure. They can manage growth, but are considered separate from growth controls such as building moratoria.[2][3]
APFO regulations are typically applied to a jurisdiction which has legislative control of a given area. In America, this can be at a state, county, or city level. A conflict can occur when APFO regulations differ in scope between jurisdictions where there is shared funding and legislative authority (such as a city located inside a county that funds schools).[6] While APFOs are intended to mitigate infrastructure shortcomings for a particular area, the mitigation may apply to areas offsite of the development project.[7] APFO regulations usually apply to individual projects on a case-by-case basis.[8]
APFO regulations take into account some or all of a jurisdiction's infrastructure requirements, including:[9]
Traditional opponents of APFO legislation include industries affected by moratoria or fees, including realtors, developers, and some Smart Growth advocates.[10] Home costs for some locations that have enacted APFO have experienced increases in housing prices affecting affordable housing, in conjunction with positive effects of relief from school capacity shortcomings.[11]
^Sherry Greenfield (10 January 2008). "Gardner says moratorium will not hurt building industry". The Gazette.
^Lewis D. Hopkins. Urban Development: The Logic Of Making Plans. p. 138.
^American Planning Association; Frederick R. Steiner; Kent Butler. Planning and Urban Design Standards. p. 377.
^Sara Newman (1 January 2015). "Calvert County finds northern school populations inadequate Multiple schools closed to future district development". The Gazette.
^Kristine Williams. Driveway Regulation Practices. p. 58.