PROFILPELAJAR.COM

71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance
71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance
	Poster
German	71 Fragmente einer Chronologie des Zufalls
Directed by	Michael Haneke
Written by	Michael Haneke
Produced by	Veit Heiduschka
Starring	Gabriel Cosmin Urdes; Lukas Miko; Otto Grünmandl; Anne Bennent; Udo Samel
Cinematography	Christian Berger
Edited by	Marie Homolkova
Release date	May 14, 2004; (Cannes)
Running time	96 minutes
Countries	Austria; Germany
Languages	German; Romanian

71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance (German: 71 Fragmente einer Chronologie des Zufalls) is a 1994 drama film written and directed by Michael Haneke.^[1] It has a fragmented storyline as the title suggests, and chronicles several seemingly unrelated stories in parallel, but these separate narrative lines intersect in an incident at the end of the film. The film is set in Vienna from October to December 1993. Haneke refers to 71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance as the last part of his "glaciation trilogy", the other parts of which are his preceding two films The Seventh Continent and Benny's Video.

Plot

The film opens with intertitles which introduce the mass killing in detail. It then chronicles in flashbacks the previous few months of several people in Vienna. A young Romanian boy sneaks across the border at night, wading through a swamp and hiding in the back of a truck. In Vienna he lives on the streets as a beggar. A security worker makes pickups at a bank. At home he argues with his wife and says prayers at great length. A young man steals weapons from a military armory. A college student plays games with his friends in which they bet against each other. He bets his watch against a stolen pistol. A retired man sits at home watching TV, talking at great length to his daughter who is too busy to spend time with him. A married couple tries to adopt a young girl.

The Romanian boy is picked up by authorities and his story receives news coverage. He is taken in by the couple who wanted to adopt the girl. While out doing errands, the wife leaves him in the car while she goes inside the bank. At the same time, the retired man goes to the bank under the guise of picking up his pension, but he's really there to see his daughter who works there.

The college student stops for gas. Short on cash, he goes across the street to use the ATM, but it is out of order. Stressed out and in a rush, he goes inside the crowded bank and attempts to cut to the front of the line, but he is assaulted by another customer. He leaves the bank and walks back to his car where he retrieves his gun. He returns to the bank, where he begins firing indiscriminately at the people inside. He then walks back to his car and shoots himself.

Characters

The drama consists of varied characters in each storyline: a Romanian boy who immigrated illegally into Austria and lives on the streets of Vienna; a religious bank security worker; a lonely old man staring at a TV screen; a childless couple considering adoption; a frustrated student and so on.

Film division

The film is divided into a number of variable-length "fragments" separated by black pauses and apparently unrelated to each other. The film is characterized by several fragments that take the form of video newscasts unrelated to the main storylines. News footage of real events is shown through video monitors. Newscasts report on the Bosnian War, the Somali Civil War, the South Lebanon conflict, the Kurdish–Turkish conflict, and molestation allegations against Michael Jackson.

Reception

Adam Bingham of Senses of Cinema wrote, "Formally and conceptually, the film is one of the most challenging narrative works of the 1990s."^[2]

Manohla Dargis of The New York Times called it "an icy-cool study of violence both mediated and horribly real", concluding that "For Mr. Haneke, the point seems less that evil is commonplace than that we don’t engage with it as thinking, actively moral beings. We slurp our soup while Sarajevo burns on the boob tube."^[3]

On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 71 out of 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".^[4]