This article is about the medical scale for delirium. For the Australian radio station, see ABC Far North.
The 4 'A's Test (4AT) is a bedside medical scale used to help determine if a person has positive signs for delirium.[1][2] The 4AT also includes cognitive test items, making it suitable also for use as a rapid test for cognitive impairment.[3]
The 4AT is designed to be used as a delirium detection tool in general clinical settings, inpatient hospital settings outside of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or in the community. The 4AT is intended to be used by healthcare practitioners without the need for special training, and it takes around two minutes to complete.[4] The test was first published online in 2011; the 4AT website provides downloads, and a guide to the test along with case examples.[4] The 4AT is also available as a standalone app on the Android and iOS platforms, and as an online calculator.
Some evidence shows that the 4AT can be implemented at scale in real-world clinical practice and that it shows positive score rates at comparable levels to the expected delirium prevalence rates.[25][26]
A 2022 two-center study in real-world clinical populations (total N=82,770) found that 4AT positive scores were aligned with expected delirium rates, and also were strongly linked with important outcomes including 30-day mortality, one-year mortality, hospital length of stay, and days at home in the year following hospital admission. Notably, the 4AT was completed as part of usual care by a large number of different staff (mostly doctors and nurses) who had not received special training in use of the 4AT. This study therefore showed that the 4AT is feasible in large-scale practice and that it provides real-time delirium ascertainment with positive scores being linked to important short and longer-term outcomes.[26]
Summary
Full 4AT scale
Parameters and scoring
Points
[1] Alertness
This includes patients who may be markedly drowsy (eg. difficult to rouse
and/or obviously sleepyduring assessment) or
agitated/hyperactive.
Observe the patient. If asleep, attempt to wake withspeech or a gentle touch
on the shoulder. Ask the patient to state their name and address to assist rating.
Normal (fully alert, but not agitated, throughout assessment)
Mild sleepiness for <10 seconds after waking, then normal
Clearly abnormal
0
0
4
[2] AMT4
Age, date of birth, place (name of the hospital or building), current year.
No mistakes
1 mistake
2 or more mistakes/untestable
0
1
2
[3] Attention
Ask the patient: "Please tell me the months of the year in backwards order,
starting at December."To assist initial understanding one prompt of "what is
the month before December?" is permitted.
Achieves 7 months or more correctly
Starts but scores <7 months / refuses to start
Untestable (cannot start because unwell, drowsy, inattentive)
0
1
2
[4] Acute change or fluctuating course
Evidence of significant change or fluctuation in alertness, cognition,other
The score range is 0–12, with scores of 4 or more suggesting possible delirium. Scores of 1-3 suggest possible cognitive impairment.
There are several indications of a positive score of 4 or more. Parameters [1] and [4] can each individually trigger a positive score. The rationale is that both altered arousal and acute change in mental functioning are highly specific indicators of delirium.[27][28][29][30]
Parameters [2] and [3] provide embedded cognitive testing. These parameters can also yield an overall positive score for the 4AT: if [2] scores as 2 or more mistakes or if the patient is untestable, and with [3] the patient is untestable, then the combined score is 4, suggesting possible delirium. The rationale for allowing untestability to trigger an outcome of possible delirium is that many people with delirium are too drowsy or inattentive to undergo cognitive testing or interview.[31][30] These scoring options additionally allow the 4AT to be completed in patients who are unable to provide verbal responses.
Psychometric properties
A review of data to December 2019 involving 17 studies reported a pooled sensitivity of 88% and a pooled specificity of 88% for delirium diagnosis.[6] Since then, several additional validation studies have been published.[32][33][34][35][36][37]
A large, high quality (STARD-compliant) diagnostic randomized controlled trial comparing the 4AT and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) found that the 4AT had higher sensitivity and similar specificity to the CAM.[38]
Recommended use
The 4AT is intended to be used to assess for delirium on initial presentation with the patient, in transitions of care, in periods of high risk such as post-operatively and when delirium is suspected.[39] Using the 4AT multiple times per day for monitoring for new onset delirium for prolonged periods (weeks or more) is not recommended because of the burden of repeated cognitive testing on patients and staff.[40] However, it can be used 1-2 times per day for specified periods, e.g. peri-operatively. Additionally the 4AT is commonly used to monitor for recovery from active delirium. The 4AT is thus considered an episodic delirium test rather than a monitoring test. Use of the 4AT multiple times per day may be associated with lower compliance and overall performance because of the burden on staff and patients caused by performing several face to face interviews and cognitive testing per day.[34][41]
The 4AT is one of several other delirium assessment tools in the literature.[48] Each varies in its intended use (research, severity grading, very brief screening, etc.), completion time, need for training, and psychometric characteristics.[49][50][51][52][2]
^Bearn, A; Lea, W; Kusznir, J (29 November 2018). "Improving the identification of patients with delirium using the 4AT assessment". Nursing Older People. 30 (7): 18–27. doi:10.7748/nop.2018.e1060. PMID30426731. S2CID53303149.
^Casey, P; Cross, W; Mart, MW; Baldwin, C; Riddell, K; Dārziņš, P (March 2019). "Hospital discharge data under-reports delirium occurrence: results from a point prevalence survey of delirium in a major Australian health service". Internal Medicine Journal. 49 (3): 338–344. doi:10.1111/imj.14066. PMID30091294. S2CID205209486.
^Bellelli, PG; Biotto, M; Morandi, A; Meagher, D; Cesari, M; Mazzola, P; Annoni, G; Zambon, A (December 2019). "The relationship among frailty, delirium and attentional tests to detect delirium: a cohort study". European Journal of Internal Medicine. 70: 33–38. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2019.09.008. PMID31761505. S2CID208277203.
^Inouye, S. K.; van Dyck, C. H.; Alessi, C. A.; Balkin, S.; Siegal, A. P.; Horwitz, R. I. (1990-12-15). "Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium". Annals of Internal Medicine. 113 (12): 941–948. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941. ISSN0003-4819. PMID2240918.
^Tieges, Zoë; McGrath, Aisling; Hall, Roanna J.; Maclullich, Alasdair M. J. (December 2013). "Abnormal level of arousal as a predictor of delirium and inattention: an exploratory study". The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 21 (12): 1244–1253. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2013.05.003. ISSN1545-7214. PMID24080383.
^Schuurmans, Marieke J.; Shortridge-Baggett, Lillie M.; Duursma, Sijmen A. (2003). "The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: a screening instrument for delirium". Research and Theory for Nursing Practice. 17 (1): 31–50. doi:10.1891/rtnp.17.1.31.53169. ISSN1541-6577. PMID12751884. S2CID219203272.
^Sands, M. B.; Dantoc, B. P.; Hartshorn, A.; Ryan, C. J.; Lujic, S. (September 2010). "Single Question in Delirium (SQiD): testing its efficacy against psychiatrist interview, the Confusion Assessment Method and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale". Palliative Medicine. 24 (6): 561–565. doi:10.1177/0269216310371556. ISSN1477-030X. PMID20837733. S2CID40306973.