1916 United States presidential election in Oklahoma
1916 United States presidential election in Oklahoma
County Results
Wilson
30-40%
40-50%
50-60%
60-70%
70-80%
Hughes
30-40%
40-50%
The 1916 United States presidential election in Oklahoma took place on November 7 , 1916 , as part of the 1916 United States presidential election .
In its early years, Oklahoma was a “Solid South ” Democratic state whose founding fathers like "Alfalfa Bill" Murray and Charles N. Haskell had disfranchised most of its black population via literacy tests and grandfather clauses,[ 1] the latter of which would be declared unconstitutional in Guinn v. United States .[ 2] Partly owing to the absence of the poll taxes found in other Southern states due to the strength of populism amongst the state’s white settlers,[ 3] the state became a stronghold of the Socialist Party in the 1910s, especially in the southeast and the northwestern Plains.
Oklahoma voters overwhelmingly voted for Democratic incumbent Wilson, over the Republican nominee, Associate Justice Charles Evans Hughes .[ 4]
Despite a strong showing from the Socialist candidate Allan L. Benson , the state was won handily by President Wilson . He garnered 50.65 percent of the vote, compared to Justice Hughes who won 33.25 percent of the vote. Wilson carried the state by a margin of 17.4 percent. Oklahoma proved to be the best showing for Benson of any state in this election, where he gained 15.43 percent the vote.[ 5]
This election continued the Democratic trend in the state. Oklahoma would only vote Republican in the elections of 1920 and 1928 until the trend flipped after the 1952 presidential election .
Results
Results by county
County
Thomas Woodrow Wilson Democratic
Charles Evans Hughes Republican
Allan Louis Benson Socialist
James Franklin Hanly Prohibition
No Candidate Progressive "Bull Moose"
Margin
Total votes cast[ 7]
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
Adair
1,190
49.15%
1,010
41.72%
212
8.76%
7
0.29%
2
0.08%
180
7.43%
2,421
Alfalfa
1,390
41.94%
1,378
41.58%
471
14.21%
68
2.05%
7
0.21%
12
0.36%
3,314
Atoka
1,479
50.31%
925
31.46%
524
17.82%
9
0.31%
3
0.10%
554
18.84%
2,940
Beaver
1,382
49.82%
913
32.91%
433
15.61%
43
1.55%
3
0.11%
469
16.91%
2,774
Beckham
1,850
56.49%
527
16.09%
889
27.15%
7
0.21%
2
0.06%
961[ a]
29.34%
3,275
Blaine
1,214
37.15%
1,339
40.97%
678
20.75%
36
1.10%
1
0.03%
-125
-3.82%
3,268
Bryan
2,974
59.40%
1,267
25.30%
757
15.12%
8
0.16%
1
0.02%
1,707
34.09%
5,007
Caddo
2,735
44.25%
2,272
36.76%
1,112
17.99%
56
0.91%
6
0.10%
463
7.49%
6,181
Canadian
2,200
51.66%
1,590
37.33%
422
9.91%
43
1.01%
4
0.09%
610
14.32%
4,259
Carter
2,949
60.09%
1,013
20.64%
935
19.05%
6
0.12%
5
0.10%
1,936
39.45%
4,908
Cherokee
1,594
48.97%
1,379
42.37%
273
8.39%
8
0.25%
1
0.03%
215
6.61%
3,255
Choctaw
1,945
55.11%
957
27.12%
614
17.40%
11
0.31%
2
0.06%
988
28.00%
3,529
Cimarron
387
50.19%
238
30.87%
138
17.90%
8
1.04%
0
0.00%
149
19.33%
771
Cleveland
1,753
54.19%
885
27.36%
579
17.90%
18
0.56%
0
0.00%
868
26.83%
3,235
Coal
1,418
50.11%
824
29.12%
566
20.00%
18
0.64%
4
0.14%
594
20.99%
2,830
Comanche
2,130
51.13%
1,221
29.31%
790
18.96%
20
0.48%
5
0.12%
909
21.82%
4,166
Cotton
1,500
58.71%
685
26.81%
366
14.32%
4
0.16%
0
0.00%
815
31.90%
2,555
Craig
1,901
50.77%
1,647
43.99%
189
5.05%
6
0.16%
1
0.03%
254
6.78%
3,744
Creek
3,496
45.77%
2,820
36.92%
1,281
16.77%
32
0.42%
10
0.13%
676
8.85%
7,639
Custer
1,771
45.22%
1,507
38.48%
595
15.19%
40
1.02%
3
0.08%
264
6.74%
3,916
Delaware
1,227
53.42%
837
36.44%
221
9.62%
7
0.30%
5
0.22%
390
16.98%
2,297
Dewey
992
36.59%
796
29.36%
891
32.87%
26
0.96%
6
0.22%
101[ a]
3.73%
2,711
Ellis
960
37.46%
983
38.35%
590
23.02%
28
1.09%
2
0.08%
-23
-0.90%
2,563
Garfield
2,347
39.81%
2,854
48.41%
632
10.72%
56
0.95%
6
0.10%
-507
-8.60%
5,895
Garvin
2,697
59.62%
804
17.77%
1,001
22.13%
19
0.42%
3
0.07%
1,696[ a]
37.49%
4,524
Grady
3,243
60.55%
1,272
23.75%
819
15.29%
18
0.34%
4
0.07%
1,971
36.80%
5,356
Grant
1,700
47.42%
1,517
42.32%
294
8.20%
72
2.01%
2
0.06%
183
5.10%
3,585
Greer
1,675
66.28%
369
14.60%
480
18.99%
3
0.12%
0
0.00%
1,195[ a]
47.29%
2,527
Harmon
1,091
73.03%
147
9.84%
255
17.07%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
836[ a]
55.96%
1,494
Harper
798
42.29%
662
35.08%
408
21.62%
15
0.79%
4
0.21%
136
7.21%
1,887
Haskell
1,486
50.44%
976
33.13%
477
16.19%
5
0.17%
2
0.07%
510
17.31%
2,946
Hughes
2,187
52.00%
1,219
28.98%
791
18.81%
2
0.05%
7
0.17%
968
23.01%
4,206
Jackson
2,096
65.44%
409
12.77%
684
21.35%
13
0.41%
1
0.03%
1,412[ a]
44.08%
3,203
Jefferson
1,739
60.76%
493
17.23%
621
21.70%
8
0.28%
1
0.03%
1,118[ a]
39.06%
2,862
Johnston
1,727
54.63%
756
23.92%
671
21.23%
5
0.16%
2
0.06%
971
30.72%
3,161
Kay
2,340
44.00%
2,482
46.67%
373
7.01%
115
2.16%
8
0.15%
-142
-2.67%
5,318
Kingfisher
1,364
38.60%
1,728
48.90%
417
11.80%
24
0.68%
1
0.03%
-364
-10.30%
3,534
Kiowa
2,279
51.49%
1,017
22.98%
1,101
24.88%
24
0.54%
5
0.11%
1,178[ a]
26.62%
4,426
Latimer
950
48.49%
663
33.84%
335
17.10%
10
0.51%
1
0.05%
287
14.65%
1,959
Le Flore
2,576
49.77%
1,944
37.56%
643
12.42%
9
0.17%
4
0.08%
632
12.21%
5,176
Lincoln
2,258
39.43%
2,387
41.69%
1,047
18.29%
31
0.54%
3
0.05%
-129
-2.25%
5,726
Logan
1,701
37.00%
2,270
49.38%
552
12.01%
63
1.37%
11
0.24%
-569
-12.38%
4,597
Love
1,125
64.07%
266
15.15%
363
20.67%
2
0.11%
0
0.00%
762[ a]
43.39%
1,756
Major
762
31.99%
946
39.71%
636
26.70%
33
1.39%
5
0.21%
-184
-7.72%
2,382
Marshall
1,352
55.78%
449
18.52%
618
25.50%
5
0.21%
0
0.00%
734[ a]
30.28%
2,424
Mayes
1,574
51.93%
1,229
40.55%
226
7.46%
0
0.00%
2
0.07%
345
11.38%
3,031
McClain
1,541
56.74%
680
25.04%
492
18.11%
2
0.07%
1
0.04%
861
31.70%
2,716
McCurtain
1,763
54.89%
795
24.75%
643
20.02%
9
0.28%
2
0.06%
968
30.14%
3,212
McIntosh
1,743
54.43%
898
28.04%
552
17.24%
8
0.25%
1
0.03%
845
26.39%
3,202
Murray
1,305
61.59%
458
21.61%
350
16.52%
5
0.24%
1
0.05%
847
39.97%
2,119
Muskogee
4,004
58.23%
2,532
36.82%
324
4.71%
14
0.20%
2
0.03%
1,472
21.41%
6,876
Noble
1,346
47.68%
1,243
44.03%
214
7.58%
17
0.60%
3
0.11%
103
3.65%
2,823
Nowata
1,355
47.36%
1,322
46.21%
178
6.22%
6
0.21%
0
0.00%
33
1.15%
2,861
Okfuskee
1,337
52.80%
670
26.46%
516
20.38%
8
0.32%
1
0.04%
667
26.34%
2,532
Oklahoma
7,971
54.73%
5,291
36.33%
1,215
8.34%
77
0.53%
10
0.07%
2,680
18.40%
14,564
Okmulgee
2,406
47.75%
1,860
36.91%
754
14.96%
15
0.30%
4
0.08%
546
10.84%
5,039
Osage
2,052
51.22%
1,524
38.04%
420
10.48%
7
0.17%
3
0.07%
528
13.18%
4,006
Ottawa
1,875
50.07%
1,642
43.85%
215
5.74%
13
0.35%
0
0.00%
233
6.22%
3,745
Pawnee
1,491
43.19%
1,396
40.44%
528
15.30%
33
0.96%
4
0.12%
95
2.75%
3,452
Payne
2,140
44.50%
1,767
36.74%
833
17.32%
60
1.25%
9
0.19%
373
7.76%
4,809
Pittsburg
3,441
55.42%
1,879
30.26%
866
13.95%
22
0.35%
1
0.02%
1,562
25.16%
6,209
Pontotoc
2,418
56.39%
913
21.29%
936
21.83%
16
0.37%
5
0.12%
1,482[ a]
34.56%
4,288
Pottawatomie
3,276
50.61%
2,042
31.55%
1,119
17.29%
29
0.45%
7
0.11%
1,234
19.06%
6,473
Pushmataha
1,059
49.10%
645
29.90%
449
20.82%
4
0.19%
0
0.00%
414
19.19%
2,157
Roger Mills
1,148
50.77%
538
23.79%
565
24.99%
7
0.31%
3
0.13%
583[ a]
25.79%
2,261
Rogers
1,900
48.96%
1,435
36.98%
531
13.68%
15
0.39%
0
0.00%
465
11.98%
3,881
Seminole
1,444
44.42%
872
26.82%
921
28.33%
11
0.34%
3
0.09%
523[ a]
16.09%
3,251
Sequoyah
1,632
48.89%
1,179
35.32%
515
15.43%
8
0.24%
4
0.12%
453
13.57%
3,338
Stephens
2,343
57.88%
607
15.00%
1,077
26.61%
17
0.42%
4
0.10%
1,266[ a]
31.27%
4,048
Texas
1,349
54.64%
807
32.69%
295
11.95%
17
0.69%
1
0.04%
542
21.95%
2,469
Tillman
2,250
69.08%
625
19.19%
367
11.27%
13
0.40%
2
0.06%
1,625
49.89%
3,257
Tulsa
4,497
48.67%
3,857
41.74%
849
9.19%
27
0.29%
10
0.11%
640
6.93%
9,240
Wagoner
1,040
49.71%
749
35.80%
299
14.29%
3
0.14%
1
0.05%
291
13.91%
2,092
Washington
1,839
46.85%
1,727
44.00%
317
8.08%
41
1.04%
1
0.03%
112
2.85%
3,925
Washita
2,107
55.68%
958
25.32%
703
18.58%
14
0.37%
2
0.05%
1,149
30.36%
3,784
Woods
1,417
42.93%
1,358
41.14%
473
14.33%
51
1.54%
2
0.06%
59
1.79%
3,301
Woodward
1,130
38.65%
1,092
37.35%
665[ b]
22.74%
35
1.20%
2
0.07%
38
1.30%
2,924
Totals
148,113[ c]
50.65%
97,233
33.25%
45,190[ d]
15.45%
1,646
0.56%
234
0.08%
50,880
17.40%
292,416
See also
Notes
^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n In this county where Hughes ran third behind Wilson and Benson, margin given is Wilson vote minus Benson vote and percentage margin Wilson percentage minus Benson percentage.
^ In this county, all other Benson electors totalled either 600 or 601 votes.
^ Totals actually sum to 148,123 votes.
^ Totals actually sum to 45,151.
References
^ Ewing, Cortez Arthur Milton; An Introduction to the Government of Oklahoma (1939), p. 72. Published by Americanism Committee, American Legion, Department of Oklahoma
^ Fairclough, Adam; Better Day Coming: Blacks and Equality, 1890-2000 , p. 82 ISBN 0142001295
^ Finkelman, Paul; African-Americans and the right to vote (Garland Publishing, 1992), pp. 418, 438
^ "Election of 1916: Now just two parties, but same results as 1912" .
^ "1916 Presidential General Election Results – Oklahoma" . Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections .
^ "OK US President" .
^ Oklahoma State Archives microfilm