1913 Australian referendum (Trusts)
Unsuccessful Australian referendum
1913 Australian Trusts referendum|
|
|
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
%
|
Yes
|
967,331
|
49.78%
|
No
|
975,943
|
50.22%
|
Valid votes
|
1,943,274
|
95.69%
|
Invalid or blank votes
|
87,496
|
4.31%
|
Total votes
|
2,030,770
|
100.00%
|
Registered voters/turnout
|
2,760,216
|
73.57%
| |
The Constitution Alteration (Trusts) Bill 1912,[1] was an unsuccessful referendum held in 1913 that sought to alter the Australian Constitution to give the Commonwealth legislative power in respect to trusts.
Question
Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled 'Constitution Alteration (Trusts) 1912'?
The proposal was to alter the text of section 51 of the Constitution to read as follows:[2]
51. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have Legislative power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:
- (xl.) Trusts, combinations, and monopolies in relation to the production, manufacture, or supply of goods, or the supply of services.
Results
The referendum was not approved by a majority of voters, and a majority of the voters was achieved in only three states.[3][4]
Result [3][4]
State
|
Electoral roll
|
Ballots issued
|
For
|
Against
|
Informal
|
Vote
|
%
|
Vote
|
%
|
New South Wales
|
1,036,187
|
717,855
|
319,150
|
47.12
|
358,155
|
52.88
|
39,294
|
Victoria
|
830,391
|
626,861
|
301,729
|
49.71
|
305,268
|
50.29
|
19,536
|
Queensland
|
363,082
|
280,525
|
147,871
|
54.78
|
122,088
|
45.22
|
10,345
|
South Australia
|
244,026
|
195,463
|
96,400
|
51.67
|
90,185
|
48.33
|
8,661
|
Western Australia
|
179,784
|
132,149
|
67,342
|
53.59
|
58,312
|
46.41
|
6,162
|
Tasmania
|
106,746
|
80,398
|
314,839
|
45.38
|
41,935
|
54.62
|
3,498
|
Total for Commonwealth
|
2,760,216
|
2,033,251
|
967,331
|
49.78
|
975,943
|
50.22
|
87,496
|
Results
|
Obtained majority in three states and an overall minority of 8,612 votes. Not carried
|
Discussion
The 1911 referendum asked a single question that dealt with the acquisition of monopolies. This resolution separated laws in relation to monopolies and the acquisition of monopolies into different questions. Like its forebear, neither resolution was carried. On each of the many occasions a similar question was asked at a referendum the public decided not to vest power in the Commonwealth over these matters.[4]
See also
References
Further reading
|
|