1900 pogroms of Qing dynasty subjects in Blagoveshchensk, Russian Empire
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Chinese. (May 2019) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Chinese Wikipedia article at [[:zh:庚子俄难]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated|zh|庚子俄难}} to the talk page.
This article is missing information about specific background, aftermath and reviews. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page.(May 2019)
The 1900 Amur anti-Chinese pogroms (Chinese: 庚子俄難) were a series of ethnic killings (pogroms) and reprisals undertaken by the Russian Empire against subjects of the Qing dynasty of various ethnicities, including Manchu, Daur, and Han peoples. They took place in Blagoveshchensk and in the Sixty-Four Villages East of the River in the Amur region, during the same time as the Boxer Rebellion in China. The events ultimately resulted in thousands of deaths, the loss of residency for Chinese subjects living in the Sixty-Four Villages East of the River, and increased Russian control over the region. The Russian justification for the pogroms were attacks made on Russian infrastructure outside Blagoveshchensk by Chinese Boxers, which was then responded by Russian force. The pogroms themselves occurred in 17–21 July [O.S. 4–8 July] 1900.
Name
The name for the killings and reprisals that occurred in Amur is not standardized, and has been referred to by different names over time. The most common Chinese name for the pogroms is the Gengzi Russian disaster (traditional Chinese: 庚子俄難; simplified Chinese: 庚子俄难; pinyin: Gēngzǐ é nán), but the two most major events in Blagoveshchensk and the Sixty-Four Villages East of the River are referred to as the Blagoveshchensk massacre (traditional Chinese: 海蘭泡慘案; simplified Chinese: 海兰泡惨案; pinyin: Hǎilánpào cǎn'àn) and the Sixty-Four Villages East of the River massacre (traditional Chinese: 江東六十四屯慘案; simplified Chinese: 江东六十四屯惨案; pinyin: Jiāngdōng liùshísì tún cǎn'àn) respectively.[2]
The Russian name of the pogroms in Blagoveshchensk is referred to as the Chinese pogrom in Blagoveshchensk (Russian: китайский погром в Благовещенске), while the killings and reprisals that took place in the Sixty-Four Villages East of the River are referred to as the Battle on the Amur (Russian: бои на Амуре).[3]
Background
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2019)
This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (May 2019)
Sixty-Four Villages East of the River
Lieutenant-General Konstantin Gribskiy ordered the expulsion of all Qing subjects who remained north of the river.[4] This included the residents of the villages, and Chinese traders and workers who lived in Blagoveshchensk proper, where they numbered anywhere between one-sixth and one-half of the local population of 30,000.[4][5] They were taken by the local police and driven into the river to be drowned. Those who could swim were shot by the Russian forces.[6] There were 1,266 households, including 900 Daurs and 4,500 Manchus in the area until the massacre.[7] Many Manchu villages were burned by Cossacks in the massacre according to Victor Zatsepine.[8]
Legacy
Andrew Higgins of The New York Times wrote that Chinese and Russian officials tended to not bring up the incidents during periods of good China–Russia relations or Sino-Soviet relations, while the incident was brought up after the Sino-Soviet split with people still alive who had been in the pogroms being interviewed by Chinese officials. Higgins stated that in 2020 Chinese and Russian officials purposefully avoided dealing with the incident.[8]
^Sun, Rongtu; Xu, Xilian (1974). 瑷珲县志 [Annals of Aihui County] (in Chinese). Taipei: Cheng Wen Publishing Co., Ltd. pp. 209–210.
^Gao, Yongsheng; Li, Lingbao (March 2004). "庚子俄难"时限的再界定与思考 [Redefinition and Reflection on the Dates of the "Gengzi Russian Disaster"]. History of Heilongjiang (in Chinese): 35–36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-020X.2004.03.015. ISSN1004-020X.
^Piskunov, Sergey (12 December 2001). Rumyantsev, Vyacheslav (ed.). "Боксерское" восстание в Китае в 1898 - 1901 ["Boxer" Uprising in China in 1898–1901]. hrono.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 8 March 2003. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
^Yan, Jiaqi (28 February 2005). 中俄邊界問題的十個事實──回應俄羅斯駐中國大使館公使銜參贊岡察洛夫等人文章 [Ten facts about the Sino-Russian border problem: In reply to the essays by Russian Minister-Counselor to China Sergey Goncharov and other people]. Twenty-First Century (in Chinese) (35) (Online ed.). Archived from the original on 14 April 2005. Retrieved 24 February 2009.
^Military Scientific Committee of the General Staff (1886). Сборникъ географическихъ, топографическихъ и статистическихъ матеріаловъ по Азіи [Collection of Geographic, Topographic and Statistical Materials on Asia] (in Russian). Vol. XXXI. Saint Petersburg: Military Printing House (in the General Staff Building). p. 185.
Yang, Chuang; Gao, Fei; Feng (2006). 海兰泡和江东六十四屯惨案 [The Tragic Case of Blagoveshchensk/Hailanpao and the Sixty-Four Villages East of the River]. 百年中俄关系 [A Century of China–Russia Relations] (in Chinese). Beijing: World Affairs Press. ISBN7-5012-2876-0.